Started By
Message
re: DeAndre Baker "had" a 4 year $10.5 million dollar contract.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:14 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:14 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/22/20 at 7:53 am
0
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:15 pm to BearBait09
quote:
try reading what I said again. you're refuting a position I did not take.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:15 pm to cas4t
quote:
None of this is accurate. Not legally. Not layman’s. No one sees “armed robbery” and assumes it was a home evasion, or a bank robbery, etc. solely.
I am supremely confident if you pulled a random person off the street and asked them what "armed robbery" meant, their answer would be something along the lines of "it's when you steal from someone with a gun." They're not going to think fact specific bullshite like BearBrait has so arrogantly preached ITT while calling anyone who disagreed with him (everyone) that they're stupid, lack reading comprehension, etc.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:21 pm to lsufball19
quote:
am supremely confident if you pulled a random person off the street and asked them what "armed robbery" meant, their answer would be something along the lines of "it's when you steal from someone with a gun."
Of course this is would be their answer. His responses in another thread and this one are absurd. It’s not even a good troll if that’s the intent, because it’s just fricking dumb.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:22 pm to cas4t
quote:
consider creating a new account before posting again.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:24 pm to lsufball19
quote:
my definition of what?
quote:quote:
quote:
You obviously have no idea what gunpoint means.
brandishing a firearm, which is exactly what they allegedly did."
That is you defining "gunpoint" as "brandishing a firearm."
So clearly, you attempted to define something.
quote:
you realize that robbery while brandishing a firearm is armed robbery right?
yes? at no point did I say that it wasn't. nor did I refer to an armed robbery at all when I pointed out your definition of "gunpoint" as "brandishing a firearm" was not accurate.
quote:
Someone said I didn't know what "at gunpoint" meant
this was said ironically as the author pointed out, and only a failure to comprehend that irony could have inspired you to reply as if it was intended literally.
I don't know why I need to say this, you keep teling me I need to stop. Why on earth would you think I give ANY shits what you think I need to do? We are now 4 pages in on you and your gang of mouth breathing morons failing to understand what I actually said.
It wasn't my intent to turn this thread into an idiot test, but that's what its become. so you can move on or you can watch with me as each new moron proudly chimes in that their actions 100% fit the legal definition armed robbery.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:24 pm to BearBait09
quote:
BearBait09
holy shite man
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:27 pm to BearBait09
quote:
We are now 4 pages in on you and your gang of mouth breathing morons failing to understand what I actually said.
At some point you have to look around and realize if you’re the only one saying one thing, and everyone else is saying another, the majority are unlikely to be the “morons”.
It’s you, man. You’re the moron.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:28 pm to BearBait09
quote:
That is you defining "gunpoint" as "brandishing a firearm."
So clearly, you attempted to define something.
quote:
you realize that robbery while brandishing a firearm is armed robbery right?
yes? at no point did I say that it wasn't. nor did I refer to an armed robbery at all when I pointed out your definition of "gunpoint" as "brandishing a firearm" was not accurate.
quote:
Someone said I didn't know what "at gunpoint" meant
this was said ironically as the author pointed out, and only a failure to comprehend that irony could have inspired you to reply as if it was intended literally.
I don't know why I need to say this, you keep teling me I need to stop. Why on earth would you think I give ANY shits what you think I need to do? We are now 4 pages in on you and your gang of mouth breathing morons failing to understand what I actually said.
It wasn't my intent to turn this thread into an idiot test, but that's what its become. so you can move on or you can watch with me as each new moron proudly chimes in that their actions 100% fit the legal definition armed robbery.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:34 pm to cas4t
you would have a point if you all were actually offering up arguments that were in conflict with what I said.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:38 pm to BearBait09
quote:
you would have a point if you all were actually offering up arguments that were in conflict with what I said.
I’ve quoted you directly and said everything you typed was completely and utterly false. Idk what else you want from me. You seem to think society (layman) views armed robbery in some skewed manner, which they don’t. It’s actually very simple.
I guess feel free to elaborate, although it feels unneeded.
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:07 pm to cas4t
My own thread is now giving me a headache.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:10 pm to BearBait09
Robbery isn't just walking into a place with a gun.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:24 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Thug U representing.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 5:39 pm to Poker Dough
Going in a home with a gun is home invasion armed robbery.
Are y'all just ignoring the part of the story where a 3rd guy that was supposedly the getaway driver was waiting outside, then came inside with a mask on and baker told him to shoot the guy they were robbing.
Now I may be wrong,but this seems to be a planned robbery.
Are y'all just ignoring the part of the story where a 3rd guy that was supposedly the getaway driver was waiting outside, then came inside with a mask on and baker told him to shoot the guy they were robbing.
Now I may be wrong,but this seems to be a planned robbery.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 6:20 pm to Tigerpride18
Dunbar's Lawyers claim to have signed affidavits from 5 folks in attendance that claim his client didn't Rob anyone
The arrest warrant for Dunbar is still active though
Look for Baker's Lawyer to do the same thing, I'm guessing this foray into stupidity will cost each guy over $1million spread among the victims plus Lawyer Fees rendering these idiots broke even if they do get another Contract, this 1 stunt means these 2 idiots will have played in the NFL for free & will never get any endorsement money
Stupid
I wonder how their Moms feel seeing their idiot kids splashed all over TV for something so stupid
The arrest warrant for Dunbar is still active though
Look for Baker's Lawyer to do the same thing, I'm guessing this foray into stupidity will cost each guy over $1million spread among the victims plus Lawyer Fees rendering these idiots broke even if they do get another Contract, this 1 stunt means these 2 idiots will have played in the NFL for free & will never get any endorsement money
Stupid
I wonder how their Moms feel seeing their idiot kids splashed all over TV for something so stupid
Posted on 5/15/20 at 7:13 pm to PeeJayScammedGT
Dunbar is absolved of his involvement.
Baker, a thUGa representative, is still on the hook.
Dunbar should do better to associate with crooks.
Baker, a thUGa representative, is still on the hook.
Dunbar should do better to associate with crooks.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 9:17 pm to Tigerpride18
Both charged with 4 counts of armed robbery
Posted on 5/15/20 at 9:21 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
His “buddy” is already rolling on him.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 9:26 pm to CapstoneGrad06
First good decision he's made this week
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News