Started By
Message
re: DeAndre Baker "had" a 4 year $10.5 million dollar contract.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:21 pm to BearBait09
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:21 pm to BearBait09
quote:
I never said it wasn't armed robbery. I'm saying armed robbery is insufficiently descriptive. there's more context to this story.
I think we can all agree that robbing people at a bbq for less than 100k worth of stuff is a mindbogglingly poor decision for someone to make who is due to earn several million dollars yearly, but to apply that point here requires us to assume there is no additional context that explains what happened. what if they were being cheated at the card game? what if one of their victims had just welched on a huge bet? shite is always more complicated than the headline.
Geez dude, just shut up.
1
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:24 pm to 3down10
quote:
Geez dude, just shut up.
I'm real sorry my presence is a burden to you, but I've learned to live with yours. I think if you dig deep you can find it within yourself to kiss my arse.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:26 pm to BearBait09
quote:
I'm real sorry my presence is a burden to you, but I've learned to live with yours. I think if you dig deep you can find it within yourself to kiss my arse.
Keep digging the hole deeper if you are that committed to it.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:29 pm to BearBait09
quote:
. let me spell it out for you. the point I am making is that while "armed robbery" is legally accurate, the verbiage as a descriptor for this event is imperfect because it is inspires an inaccurate imagining by the typical uninformed reader (tell me uninformed reader is not applicable to the rant, I dare you.)
The typical context described as an armed robbery is an incident of abrupt theft without provocation or familiarity between the criminal and the victim. such as a bank teller or gas station cashier being compelled to empty their register drawer.
This isnt that. That is the point I was making.
LOL. The old "I'll try to spin my way out by pretending to be intelligent" ploy. Failing miserably
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:33 pm to BearBait09
quote:
I'm saying armed robbery is insufficiently descriptive
While still being 100% legally accurate.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:45 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
You obviously have no idea what gunpoint means.
brandishing a firearm, which is exactly what they allegedly did.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 1:51 pm to lsufball19
quote:
brandishing a firearm, which is exactly what they allegedly did.
I was being sarcastic since that other guy was saying we don't know what armed robbery is.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:02 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:08 pm to lsufball19
yall just high fived each other over some truly breathtaking reading comprehension failures.
If you're a lawyer I weep for your clients.
If you're a lawyer I weep for your clients.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:46 pm to BearBait09
quote:
breathtaking reading comprehension failures.
Not agreeing with your premise that this event wouldn't fit a "layman's view" of armed robbery has nothing to do with reading comprehension my man. It's just that no one agrees with you. It's fine, you're entitled to your opinion, as misguided as it may be.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:50 pm to lsufball19
true, but refuting a statement I never made because you failed to realize the author was being sarcastic, and not actually quoting me, most definitely is a reading comprehension failure.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:54 pm to BearBait09
quote:
but refuting a statement I never made
I never said nor inferred, directly or indirectly, you made a statement you didn't. I simply responded to a comment directed at me by another poster. Believe it or not, people can have multiple conversations within the same thread.
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:55 pm to BearBait09
quote:
true, but refuting a statement I never made because you failed to realize the author was being sarcastic, and not actually quoting me, most definitely is a reading comprehension failure.
wow.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 2:59 pm to BearBait09
What the frick are you talking about?
Absolutely none of this is true.
Log off.
quote:
The typical context described as an armed robbery is an incident of abrupt theft without provocation or familiarity between the criminal and the victim. such as a bank teller or gas station cashier being compelled to empty their register drawer.
Absolutely none of this is true.
Log off.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:05 pm to lsufball19
sure man. comically your definition isnt even correct. brandishing a weapon is its own crime and is notably less serious than pointing a gun at someone. which is assault with a deadly weapon in many jurisdictions.
so what type of law do you practice?
so what type of law do you practice?
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:07 pm to BearBait09
quote:
so what type of law do you practice?
The one where it doesn’t require being unfamiliar with the person you are robbing to be considered armed robbery.
Please, cite your source.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:08 pm to cas4t
quote:
The one where it doesn’t require being unfamiliar with the person you are robbing to be considered armed robbery.
Please, cite your source.
try reading what I said again. you're refuting a position I did not take.
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:11 pm to BearBait09
quote:
comically your definition isnt even correct
my definition of what?
quote:
brandishing a weapon is its own crime and is notably less serious than pointing a gun at someone. which is assault with a deadly weapon in many jurisdictions.
you realize that robbery while brandishing a firearm is armed robbery right? Nevermind the fact that I never provided a legal definition of armed robbery at any point in this thread, so I'd love to know how I've incorrectly defined armed robbery.
But if you want to talk about reading comprehension. Someone said I didn't know what "at gunpoint" meant, which isn't even a legal term to begin with. I said what I thought it meant. And you took that as me defining armed robbery. Wow
quote:
which is assault with a deadly weapon in many jurisdictions.
it's both
quote:
so what type of law do you practice?
the type of law you don't practice, obviously
But if you must know, I worked in the DAs office for 3 years in law school, then did criminal defense work for 4-5 after law school until I grew to have a pretty high distaste for that area of law. As of now, I will only handle small and simple misdemeanor cases from direct referrals for friends (maybe 1-2 a year). Things like 1st offense DUIs, simple possession, FTA on a traffic ticket. The main focus of my practice is family law, so I do have to handle criminal issues that may come up with an existing client in a divorce or custody litigation. You really need to stop. With every post, you sound increasingly more ignorant, while doing so in the most arrogant and pretentious manner possible. It's quite amazing.
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:12 pm to PeeJayScammedGT
quote:
I'm much lower on the idiot scale than the guy that wrote, " us whites need to stop supporting these black thugs that play for our school"
Don't look now but you're defending lunacy and idiotic ideals
Stop buying Tix and the SEC Office is still going to send UGA's Athl Dept that $45 million check AND another fan will glady buy your season Tix and take your spot
Idiots like you and Cobb Dawg wait with baited breath to try and boot-strap your biases to any idiotic mistake an Athlete makes
Makes me think that you & Cobb Dawg got cucked during your College years and saw the girl of your dreams leaving a FB player's dorm room with her hair messed up and her clothes disheveled and now you have a love-hate relationship with big time College Sports & the Athletes that play them
Lol
Posted on 5/15/20 at 3:13 pm to BearBait09
quote:
The typical context described as an armed robbery is an incident of abrupt theft without provocation or familiarity between the criminal and the victim. such as a bank teller or gas station cashier being compelled to empty their register drawer.
This is what you said.
None of this is accurate. Not legally. Not layman’s. No one sees “armed robbery” and assumes it was a home evasion, or a bank robbery, etc. solely.
You made it up not long ago, in this thread, in hopes of winning an argument.
But you failed miserably and should consider creating a new account before posting again.
This post was edited on 5/15/20 at 3:14 pm
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News