Started By
Message
Stat comparison 2018 to 2019
Posted on 10/21/19 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 10/21/19 at 1:47 pm
Let's see how bad we truly are:
Rush Offense
2018 - 224.4 yards/game
2019 - 159.2 yards/game
Pass Offense
2018 - 252.6 yards/game
2019 - 235.4 yards/game
Total Offense
2018 - 477.0 yards/game
2019 - 394.5 yards/game
Scoring Offense
2018 - 36.0 points/game
2019 - 29.5 points/game
Rush Defense
2018 - 95.2 yards/game
2019 - 130.7 yards/game
Pass Defense
2018 - 253.5 yards/game
2019 - 209.5 yards/game
Total Defense
2018 - 348.4 yards/game
2019 - 340.2 yards/game
Scoring Defense
2018 - 25.3 points/game
2019 - 22.5 points/game
Turnover Margin
2018 - (-0.54)/game
2019 - (-0.46)/game
Record
2018: 9-4
2019: 8-5
Worse in every offensive category, better in every defensive category except run defense and better in turnover margin
Rush Offense
2018 - 224.4 yards/game
2019 - 159.2 yards/game
Pass Offense
2018 - 252.6 yards/game
2019 - 235.4 yards/game
Total Offense
2018 - 477.0 yards/game
2019 - 394.5 yards/game
Scoring Offense
2018 - 36.0 points/game
2019 - 29.5 points/game
Rush Defense
2018 - 95.2 yards/game
2019 - 130.7 yards/game
Pass Defense
2018 - 253.5 yards/game
2019 - 209.5 yards/game
Total Defense
2018 - 348.4 yards/game
2019 - 340.2 yards/game
Scoring Defense
2018 - 25.3 points/game
2019 - 22.5 points/game
Turnover Margin
2018 - (-0.54)/game
2019 - (-0.46)/game
Record
2018: 9-4
2019: 8-5
Worse in every offensive category, better in every defensive category except run defense and better in turnover margin
This post was edited on 12/27/19 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:00 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
We are worse in every category except for pass defense and turnover margin.
Offensively much worse. The OL is by far and away the glaring issue with the 2019 team. Also clearly missing Trayveon and Sternberger. Although Spiller and Wydermyer showed some signs in the OM game of future promise.
The defense in my opinion is more or less the same as last year. A little less effective in the front 7 and a little more effective in the back end. Also forcing more turnovers (or at least it feels like it).
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:19 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
So similar to Sherman leaving sumlin his best players for his first season, maybe Sumlin left some of his best players to Jimbo in the first season?
As frustrating as it is, we all know that while Sumlin’s classes would grade out well on paper, there were usually holes in several positions and the star talent we did have was always heavily stacked to the skill positions, when we really need depth on both lines and in other spots.
This year is just going to have to be a painful growing year, it is still a team of mostly guys sumlin recruited and jimbo has only had one season with. Maybe we can see some improvement by the end of the year, and we better damn well see improvement next season where jimbo will have two full classes of his guys and multiple years of his coaching.
As frustrating as it is, we all know that while Sumlin’s classes would grade out well on paper, there were usually holes in several positions and the star talent we did have was always heavily stacked to the skill positions, when we really need depth on both lines and in other spots.
This year is just going to have to be a painful growing year, it is still a team of mostly guys sumlin recruited and jimbo has only had one season with. Maybe we can see some improvement by the end of the year, and we better damn well see improvement next season where jimbo will have two full classes of his guys and multiple years of his coaching.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 5:59 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
This is the information we expect from you
Posted on 10/21/19 at 6:01 pm to Texas Gentleman
Losing sternberger and Trevion was brutal
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:53 pm to Texas Gentleman
quote:
As frustrating as it is, we all know that while Sumlin’s classes would grade out well on paper, there were usually holes in several positions and the star talent we did have was always heavily stacked to the skill positions, when we really need depth on both lines and in other spots.
This post was edited on 10/21/19 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:13 pm to Old Sarge
I would add in the loss of Erik McCoy as well.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 5:22 pm to Slotback
quote:
I would add in the loss of Erik McCoy as well.
and Keaton Sutherland, and Connor Lanfear...
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:22 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Member when all we wished for was a better secondary?
That worked out well.
That worked out well.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 9:17 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Total Offense
2018 - 512.4 yards/game
2019 - 408.1 yards/game
Scoring Offense
2018 - 32.3 points/game
2019 - 30.9 points/game
Of course you’d view our increase in offensive efficiency as a negative.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 4:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Interesting but it feels like our D is much improved vs last year. This year our offense totally disappears for long stretches leaving our D out there.
Posted on 10/26/19 at 4:47 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Updated after 8 games.
Also:
2018: 5-3 (3-2)
2019: 5-3 (3-2)
Also:
2018: 5-3 (3-2)
2019: 5-3 (3-2)
Posted on 10/27/19 at 9:44 am to CGSC Lobotomy
That turnover margin makes a huge difference!
Posted on 10/27/19 at 9:59 am to RoscoeHarper
I haven’t looked at the #s but i would guess red zone eff and TD% in the red zone are both up as well.
Posted on 11/2/19 at 7:34 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Updated through 9 games.
Posted on 11/16/19 at 11:04 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Updated after 10 games.
Posted on 11/24/19 at 8:09 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Something tells me the scoring defense stats will skew heavily in 2019's favor after next week.
Posted on 12/28/19 at 8:11 am to CGSC Lobotomy
We are so screwed if Elko leaves.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News