Started By
Message
SEC Standings Since 1992 Expansion
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:52 pm
1. Florida- 73.2% (161-59-0)
2. Alabama- 70.2% (154-65-1)
3. Georgia- 63.8% (136-77-1)
4. LSU- 61.0% (130-83-1)
5. Auburn- 59.3% (126-86-2)
6. Tennessee- 58.0% (123-89-1)
7. Texas A&M- 52.1% (25-23-0)
8. Missouri- 46.0% (23-27-0)
9. S. Carolina- 43.3% (90-118-1)
10. Arkansas- 43.1% (90-119-2)
11. Ole Miss- 39.4% (82-126-0)
12. Miss. St.- 39.0% (81-127-1)
13. Kentucky- 27.4% (57-151-0)
14. Vanderbilt- 19.2% (40-168-0)
The obvious gaps are between the Big 6... then the Next 6... and then the Horrific 2
And that is your main issue of imbalance: Kentucky and Vandy being in the same division.
17
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:53 pm to BHMKyle
A&M and Missouri???
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:54 pm to CNB
quote:
A&M and Missouri???
Well they've played SEC games haven't they?
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:57 pm to BHMKyle
Not as many SEC games as USC and Arkansas.
Just glad the schools below us, are below us.
Just glad the schools below us, are below us.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:59 pm to BHMKyle
I can live with this. We've endured the two worst 6 year stretches in Arkansas football history and are just behind USC. Who would have thought that Danny Ford and Bret Bielema with their records coming into the conference would have been the poison pills for Arkansas?
Posted on 12/22/17 at 3:59 pm to BHMKyle
Tier 1 Florida and Bama
Tier 2 UGA, LSU, AU, Tenn
All with multiple SEC titles in that time.
Then everyone else, zero.
Tier 2 UGA, LSU, AU, Tenn
All with multiple SEC titles in that time.
Then everyone else, zero.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:00 pm to momentoftruth87
It's amazing how almost identical our records are
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:08 pm to CNB
I'm shocked we're 9th given what happened in 1998 and 1999.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:18 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
And that is your main issue of imbalance: Kentucky and Vandy being in the same division.
And yet Tennessee still went 0-8 in the East
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:22 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
Well they've played SEC games haven't they?
Not since ‘92 which is referenced in your subject line.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:23 pm to CNB
quote:
It's amazing how almost identical our records are
That is wild. That 0-16 streak in 98/99 really set us back.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:24 pm to CNB
It is pretty crazy man!
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:25 pm to BHMKyle
Your numbers are off.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:25 pm to Arksulli
Two more games then SC. That's two more bowls. That gives us a pretty strong case for the 9 spot.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:27 pm to hogNsinceReagan
quote:
That's two more bowls.
It's SEC standings...
It's because Arkansas played in 2 more championship games than us.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:27 pm to piggilicious
quote:
Not since ‘92 which is referenced in your subject line.
Every SEC game Texas A&M and Missouri have played has come since 1992... its just that they've all been in the last 6 seasons.
I used winning % so at some point you've got to include them. I chose '92 Expansion because that is when we switched to a Divisional Format.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:28 pm to CNB
quote:
It's SEC standings...
It's because Arkansas played in 2 more championship games than us.
O, yeah.
This post was edited on 12/22/17 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:28 pm to Korin
quote:
Your numbers are off.
Nope. SEC Championship Games are included...
That's why Mizzou has played two more games than Texas A&M
That's why Arkansas has played two more games than S. Carolina
Etc.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:33 pm to UpstateCock2007
quote:
That is wild. That 0-16 streak in 98/99 really set us back.
Nah not really. South Carolina has won 43.3% of its SEC games overall... even after going 0-16 in 98/99.
Had Carolina gone 7-9 instead those two seasons.... mirroring their typical SEC record over a 2-year span... the overall winning percentage over the past 26 seasons would only rise to 46.9%
So yes, it would rise 3.6%, but it would only move you up one more spot. You'd be 0.65% ahead of Mizzou.
Posted on 12/22/17 at 4:37 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
Nope. SEC Championship Games are included...
That's why Mizzou has played two more games than Texas A&M
That's why Arkansas has played two more games than S. Carolina
Etc.
Still off.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News