SCLibertarian

Sparklin taters

We don't deserve dogs. They are such beautiful creatures.

I have followed this case the last few weeks and the reaction of many women is absolutely disgusting. So I wanted to pose a question to the board to see what your thoughts are.

What if Clancy had murdered someone else's children and not just her own? What if a friend's children were there during her "alleged" psychotic break and they were strangled as well? Would women still be defending her? I don't believe they would be, at least to the extent they are now.

If this is the case, is this trial simply American women consciously or subconsciously asserting that women should be able to murder their own living children without any criminal consequences? If she was in a psychotic state, the identity of her victims should be irrelevant, but I don't think the reactions would be the same.

They say Cornell was never the same after Andrew Wood died.

This is even better than the Rafael Belliard homer in 1997.

Wow

Lee is toast

quote:

---

25 Years On: What has ‘Never Forget 9/11’ accomplished?

---

It's the rallying cry for unconstitutional wars, mass surveillance and general government overreach.

You can thank the idiot retirees in the coastal counties for her win. Here's Graham's vote percentages there:

Horry: 73%

Georgetown: 68%

Charleston: 56%

Beaufort: 66%