Started By
Message
With the big 12 not expanding
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:35 pm
Will the sec go after anyone? Oklahoma would be fun. Maybe baylor?
12
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:36 pm to Wolf Shirt
Trade OU for Mizzou thats it.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:37 pm to Wolf Shirt
quote:
Maybe baylor?
What?
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:37 pm to Wolf Shirt
No one.
The Big 12 GOR and the ACC GOR are each worth over $100 million.
Realignment is dead for a while.
The Big 12 GOR and the ACC GOR are each worth over $100 million.
Realignment is dead for a while.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:40 pm to Wolf Shirt
quote:
baylor?
This deserves a lifetime ban.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:40 pm to Wolf Shirt
2025 is the year the Big 12 explodes and all these small schools like Iowa State and Kansas State that voted against expansion get left out in the cold.
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:42 pm to Wolf Shirt
quote:
With the big 12 not expanding, it should now be the power 4
Fixed
Posted on 10/17/16 at 9:46 pm to Wolf Shirt
quote:
Maybe baylor?
This is a bad idea and you should feel bad.
Sure, they're doing swell with Briles' players. But a reckoning is coming. Google "Tarp of Shame".
Once things revert to the norm they'll be Vandy without the outstanding academics.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 1:51 am to Wolf Shirt
Get rid of Mizzou. Bring in UT 
Posted on 10/18/16 at 5:16 am to Wolf Shirt
OU and OSU kind of tied at the hip through state politics. They go as a pair... wherever they go. Certainly the case as long as T. Boone Pickens is alive.
OU and OSU would be a great fit. I certainly wouldn't object to a visit to Norman every other year.
OU and OSU would be a great fit. I certainly wouldn't object to a visit to Norman every other year.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 6:25 am to Wolf Shirt
WVU is the only cultural fit for the SEC in that conference.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 10:37 am to Wolf Shirt
All these permutations are meaningless, especially when you talk about academics and culture.
It's simple: Any addition has to bring in more incremental money than it takes out. The ONLY schools/states where this is even remotely possible are NC and VA.
A&M got the golden ticket for the state of Texas. You think Texas subscribers are going to double the money if another Texas school joins? Nope. Think there are enough TV's in OK to justify EITHER Zero U or Okie Lite, much less both? Nope.
Maybe Va Tech and NC State are worth pursuing, but I doubt it. Outside of those, no other school is even worth a second thought.
It's simple: Any addition has to bring in more incremental money than it takes out. The ONLY schools/states where this is even remotely possible are NC and VA.
A&M got the golden ticket for the state of Texas. You think Texas subscribers are going to double the money if another Texas school joins? Nope. Think there are enough TV's in OK to justify EITHER Zero U or Okie Lite, much less both? Nope.
Maybe Va Tech and NC State are worth pursuing, but I doubt it. Outside of those, no other school is even worth a second thought.
Posted on 10/18/16 at 2:23 pm to Wolf Shirt
Just my opinion, but I feel like there are too many already. How many years between playing non-permanent cross divisional opponents as it stands now?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News