Started By
Message

bad targeting flags.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:16 am
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:16 am
For some friendly discussion. What are some horrible targeting calls that your team has had this year ?
I can see how the flag would fly on a hard hit. But to also miss the review is ridiculous.
For tennessee,in the Kentucky game the call where mosley was ejected. Receiver took 3 steps and the tn dB turned his body and lead with the shoulder to the receivers chest. There was no contact to the head or neck.
LINK
I know we aren't the only team to suffer one of these calls.
Another question is should the refs be held accountable for these , since the player loses playing time ?
I can see how the flag would fly on a hard hit. But to also miss the review is ridiculous.
For tennessee,in the Kentucky game the call where mosley was ejected. Receiver took 3 steps and the tn dB turned his body and lead with the shoulder to the receivers chest. There was no contact to the head or neck.
LINK
I know we aren't the only team to suffer one of these calls.
Another question is should the refs be held accountable for these , since the player loses playing time ?
This post was edited on 11/2/15 at 8:33 am
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:18 am to RockyTop247
that targeting call on the florida player this weekend was bullshite
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:22 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
that targeting call on the florida player this weekend was bullshite
Yeah I think both were bullshite calls....
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:23 am to RockyTop247
I think the ones that anger most fans are the ones where the bulk of the contact is body to body and the helmet contact is incidental. I guess you could make the type of helmet contact as either flagrant or incidental on review. But I think that's unlikely to happen in the current environment.
This post was edited on 11/2/15 at 8:24 am
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:25 am to RockyTop247
Ricky Seals Jones during the state game. Even the announcers knew how retarded that call was
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:27 am to RockyTop247
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:29 am to geauxnavybeatbama
I hate the call on Cronkrite, but since he left his feet (launching) I knew it was going to be called.
I thought ours against Vandy (Lorenzo Carter) was pretty bad. Not as bad as 2013 against Vandy, but still bad.
I thought ours against Vandy (Lorenzo Carter) was pretty bad. Not as bad as 2013 against Vandy, but still bad.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:31 am to RockyTop247
I know we can complain about it but until the schools put pressure on the ncaa, nothing will be done.
I wish some of the kid influential AD's would start pressuring the NCAA to change the rule.
It's a damn stupid rule.
I wish some of the kid influential AD's would start pressuring the NCAA to change the rule.
It's a damn stupid rule.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:33 am to Dawgsontop34
Targeting rule is bullshite.
This stuff ain't football today.
This stuff ain't football today.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:34 am to RockyTop247
The one in the Texas Tech oSu game was the worst I have seen so far
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:36 am to RoscoeHarper
We got to protect the players but we've gone too far and it's hurting this game.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:40 am to RockyTop247
If that's a targeting call, it's probably because the refs are pussies.
The Florida targeting was also bullshite. The man lead with his hands and used the force from his body through his hands to push the guy. The collision looked hard because of the change of direction. Still can't believe some of my friends want that to be illegal.
Now this is targeting. Leading with crown of helmet into head/neck area on to an unassuming tackler.
The Florida targeting was also bullshite. The man lead with his hands and used the force from his body through his hands to push the guy. The collision looked hard because of the change of direction. Still can't believe some of my friends want that to be illegal.
Now this is targeting. Leading with crown of helmet into head/neck area on to an unassuming tackler.

Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:43 am to RockyTop247
quote:
Another question is should the refs be held accountable for these , since the player loses playing time ?
Well not just them. The entire rule has taken away from the aggressive nature of the game. Yes, hitting late and hitting out of bounds is justified. But hitting with pads under the chin is not like helmet hits. But another thorn in my side is the way they escort the player off the field. You would think the player was a convict being arrested. With all this talk by the NCAA about protecting the athlete, what is the difference between a recruit jilting a university by stringing them along and not signing and showing one walking off the field with his head down and embarrassed by what he did?
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:44 am to RockyTop247
Any hard hit is flagged as a PF or targeting these days
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:46 am to HurricaneTiger
quote:
Now this is targeting. Leading with crown of helmet into head/neck area on to an unassuming tackler.
Remember Jordan Jefferson and that late hit a few years back that was not called? I think that was the Bama game to.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:53 am to RockyTop247
Meh. Seen worse calls. Aim lower. We can all sit around and whine about how "this ain't football" but there are plenty of rules in place to protect players from injury, this one is just newer and people don't like change.
Did the Tennessee player take his head off? Not really. Did he aim high so he could blow him up even though he knew that can get you a penalty? You bet he did.
Did the Tennessee player take his head off? Not really. Did he aim high so he could blow him up even though he knew that can get you a penalty? You bet he did.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:56 am to madmaxvol
quote:I think what the refs are "using" there are his head was down and there was incidental contact with the head, combined.
Moseley Targeting Call Clip
Don't get me wrong, I think it's BS. That was not the crown, and yeah, that was incidental head contact with the hit actually in the chest. And did not leave his feet.
The one thing I'd like to see is a modification to the rule about who is a protected player (or is the terminology "defenseless player"?). If a QB runs the football, participates in the play other than passing (such as Brandon Harris actually having a blocking assignment on the backside when LSU runs the toss dive; UGA does same), or runs toward the play on fumble/INT should not be considered protected or defenseless.
I can't remember who/when it was, I think a Big XII game earlier in the year, I saw a QB throw a block on a run play where the RB reversed direction and he leveled a blitzing DB (or LB?) with a shot under the chin. Defender was called for targeting; that's the worst I've seen.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:56 am to GnashRebel
Did he lead with his helmet ? No
Did he launch ? No
Did he make any contact to the receivers head or neck? No
I think this call is a contributing factor to all the knee injuries .
Did he launch ? No
Did he make any contact to the receivers head or neck? No
I think this call is a contributing factor to all the knee injuries .
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:59 am to RockyTop247
Agreed. I guess the NCAA is fine with everyone going for the knees now since hitting in the chest gets you ejected
Back to top
