I20goon
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | about 7mi down a dirt road |
| Biography: | incomplete due to amnesia |
| Interests: | ADHD |
| Occupation: | Knight of the Downsies |
| Number of Posts: | 19829 |
| Registered on: | 8/4/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Insurrection
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:my bad, so easily confused
quote:
and already removed by mods
Naw
0
re: Insurrection
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 4:02 pm to Diamondawg
quote:and already removed by mods
Already posted
Interdasting.
That's likely where the NG if called up by Walz would sortie from.
That's likely where the NG if called up by Walz would sortie from.
quote:Whether or not it is illegal will be based on why it is faked.
Shows you how much 80% of the pollsters flat out lie and that should be illegal to dom these people aren't calling voters . They are making up fake numbers. It's bullshite
Unfortunately since Obama made domestic propaganda legal in the US (Smith-Mundt amended) if this is done for those purposes it is not illegal.
However, we now know that vote shaving is happening in red districts and that false polls are the primary cover to make that shaving plausible/believable. That is indeed illegal.
so suspicious timing, to Axios, leaked, and from anonymous sources.
I believe ALL of this.
/s
I believe ALL of this.
/s
re: Interesting stabilized shot of Pretti's death.
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 3:22 pm to Juan Betanzos
quote:
wasn't a calm methodical arrest with an officer giving specific commands
quote:I don't think there's such thing as a "calm, methodical arrest" on an armed and actively resisting offender.
Calm methodical arrest????? ICE/BPAs would LOVE calm methodical arrests.......
Having said that, the first officer that shoved the shite out of grey hoodie-red backpack girl SHOULD have just ordered her down to arrest her and then tackled her instead of Chad Shoving her. If he had cause to shove her like that, he had cause for an arrest.
Would Pretti still have run (from behind, and armed) to 'rescue' her? Likely. It wouldn't have changed this outcome. But he should have initiated a detainment, not a shove.
And I still want to know why if Pretti was trying to 'rescue' her why did he drag her back into the fray not once but twice. He was trying to martyr her.
re: Interesting stabilized shot of Pretti's death.
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 3:14 pm to The Third Leg
quote:what about 8 shots? How about 2? Did he kill his mother if he fired 15? Was he the only one who fired? What if he fired one and the other 4 fired 2 each? Is that still panic?
lol. How many police shootings can you find where the suspect has his back turned and the cops fire at least 9 shots at point blank range into his back? Poorly trained and panic stricken. You have to be willfully ignorant to believe otherwise.
re: Interesting stabilized shot of Pretti's death.
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 3:08 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
When he heard "gun, gun, gun" some part of his brain knew he was milliseconds from being shot
quote:I didn't say he did, or tried to. All I said was he knew the rubber was meeting the road, or lead puncturing flesh, when he heard that.
lol - sonic the hedgehog couldn’t have gone from face down with no gun in hand to shooting someone behind them in milliseconds.
At that moment in time he could have just gone limp. He chose to reach backwards. I never said anything about flipping over or actually shooting anyone. All that mattered was to keep fighting or not. It was limp, or other. He chose other. Limp MAY have saved him from what he knew, either consciously or subconsciously, was coming shortly.
quote:Maybe. This is why going limp at that time may not have worked. Too little [submission] too late.
Guy panicked and unloaded into his back. It is hilarious how many people refuse to admit it..
Yep, he unloaded into his back. Did he panic? Undetermined really. Following the 'gun, gun, gun' declaration did the officer who took his weapon have it discharge in his hand? We don't quite know for sure yet. If so, that is a natural reaction and may not be panic. When other officers say gun they are taught to draw and at least put muzzle on target. That's training working the way it was designed. Pulling the trigger? That's where he may have been panicking... or not.
My personal belief is yes, he was panicking well before drawing his weapon. Once he drew, it was done and over with regardless of the UD. But that's just opinion.
And don't forget, the first officer to draw and fire was standing at his feet with only a clear view of feet to mid-torso including where the gun once was. That's a double edged sword for him. Yes, the gun was gone from its initial position and he did reach backwards.... then he hears a shot. He did not know the current location of the gun. IMHO, he lost track of that gun because he was in panic mode; but his panic will not be called 'unreasonable' because he indeed did follow his training and did not draw until 'gun, gun, gun'.
quote:this is such a BS narrative that people, like you, use to imply intent. You shoot until neutralized. If a deadly threat calls for lethal force you apply force until it is lethal. Period. Unfortunately that includes twitching, crawling, and pugilistic pose.
It is extremely rare for a cop to shoot someone that many times, much less someone laying face down with the cop over top of them
quote:True. And I'd say the same for the Feds who choose not to enforce law.
But they still have to enforce state law. That’s the oath that they swore to.
They are NOT allowed to just sit idly by while violent mobs riot and attack ICE agents. That's dereliction of duty and perhaps violating the civil rights of those ICE agents.
But how do you do that when the political power in a state are the agitators refusing to help with fed law and refusing to enforce laws against those who help them?
The politicians have turned "who polices the police" on it's head. Who enforces the laws when the law givers, including judiciary, is in on breaking the law.
re: Any details on how Alex Pretti interfered with Border Patrol?
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 1:39 pm to StarkTiger
quote:so they had a legal order of removal and while 'observers' blocked and distracted ICE the illegal crossed the road and entered the doughnut shop where they knowingly and intentionally hindered apprehension.
A witness in a doughnut shop near the location of the incident told news outlets that a man entered the shop and the door was locked, denying federal agents entry.[needs update?] This reportedly caused federal agents to call for backup and become aggressive toward observers, including Pretti.[25]"
quote:exactly. I've seen it in Africa and central Asia.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
It's here.
And to add to his X post:
- add cyberwarfare in various forms which include doxxing (and debanking) up to communication & utility disruption
- economic disruption... active (attacking Teslas) and passive (making sure a larger and larger portion of the labor pool is non-productive)
- funding through crime. Used to revolutionaries such as Stalin robbed banks and extorted businesses. The fraud you see now is it's replacement.
Where are they training? Online mostly. But repurposed shuttered military bases such as Sandy Point and federal lands with permitting (think Sierra Club knockoffs) as well as some foreign locales such as the Sinoloa Cartel's area and VZ. Foreign locales are for leadership only. BLM organizers received 'education' in VZ and everybody ignored it as the indicator it was.
re: Kash confirms a full investigation into the Signal chats in Minnesota
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 1:22 pm to hawgfaninc
Oh, so Crooks using both Telegraph and Signal apps wasn't hint enough for him to get on this day 1?
re: One good unintended consequence of Trump removing illegal aliens
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 1:20 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Courts said:
1. They don't HAVE to assist feds with fed laws
2. Also said the CANT enforce fed law within their borders
Meaning: black robes said the only thing a state can do is ignore non-enforcement of fed law. That's the only choice they have been left with.
1. They don't HAVE to assist feds with fed laws
2. Also said the CANT enforce fed law within their borders
Meaning: black robes said the only thing a state can do is ignore non-enforcement of fed law. That's the only choice they have been left with.
quote:But who is actually doing violence?
It's not about "both sides" so much as it is extremists on either side can cause a lot of problems for the rest of law abiding society.
Point to the people and where they fall on the political spectrum. Point to the victims, and where are they?
Actions. Not some boogeyman MSDNC told you about.
On whose ground is whose blood spilled.
quote:
It is quite literally the headline.
quote:you do have a valid point
Then it's very odd that the same statement wasn't also made in the body of the article don't you think?
ETA: ICE policy is, or was, not to require body cams. Border Patrol on the other hand does have a policy requiring them. This was instituted after Mayokas accused his own people of being racist for whipping Haitan illegal aliens from horseback and was pushed by the union, not DHS.
Why doesn't ICE require them? The whole design of the ICE sub-department is to retrieve illegals from detainment of some sort (such as county lockup) and send them home. They were never intended to do much field/street ops- that was BP/DHS in conjunction with local law enforcements. The marxists turned that on it's head, intentionally.
re: Maine gov Janet Mills
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 1:03 pm to TigersHuskers
There goes Trump acting all un-Presidential again!
quote:always seems to be like a Mel Brooks movie to me
Everytime I see the liberal gi joe/Jane wanna bees yelling medic medic cracks me up. Their has to be a song with everyone else joining the chorus of medic, medic.
quote:Biden is the one that declared war on me and mine threatening to use the US Military I didn't declare on the war on him
Armed state violence by the right
re: I see... little people...
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 12:47 pm to ActusHumanus
Great, now the Chinese have leprechauns. Next BLM will tell us leprechauns were invented in the Congo or some shite
When he heard "gun, gun, gun" some part of his brain knew he was milliseconds from being shot.
He had one last chance and that was to go completely limp with palms up and hope for the best. Instead he reached back.
He had one last chance and that was to go completely limp with palms up and hope for the best. Instead he reached back.
re: You’ll never guess what MN AG Kieth Ellison said in regards to protesting and firearms
Posted by I20goon on 1/26/26 at 12:35 pm to hogcard1964
quote:I know of one series of events you really really shouldn't do: while armed and committing a felony run up behind a federal law enforcement officer and when taken to the ground continue to resist and then act all surprised and s*** if you're still alive
Not sure it's a great idea to carry a fire arm if you're rioting or are in fact, a domestic terrorist.
Popular
19
