Started By
Message
The top 3 underachieving athletic programs
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:49 pm
1-Texas A&M. 1 title in the big 3 sports. Have all the resources in the world to be successful, are located in probably the best state for recruiting, and they still haven't won anything. They really haven't been competitive in basketball, baseball or football for the majority of their history. I think this is an easy number 1 choice, but I had a few reservations since they are lil bro of Texas.
2-Georgia. No explanation needed. They've never won jack and Georgia is a state with all types of recruiting advantages in baseball and football.
3-Arizona State. They should be more successful, and have had some bad years across several sports. Perpetual underachievers.
2-Georgia. No explanation needed. They've never won jack and Georgia is a state with all types of recruiting advantages in baseball and football.
3-Arizona State. They should be more successful, and have had some bad years across several sports. Perpetual underachievers.
19
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:50 pm to LSUforlife12
Arizona State? Odd choice...
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:51 pm to LSUforlife12
somebody likes starting threads
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:51 pm to LSUforlife12
quote:
Georgia. No explanation needed. They've never won jack and Georgia is a state with all types of recruiting advantages in baseball and football.
wat?
we have 28 national championships
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:53 pm to LSUforlife12
Define jack for me please. MNC in football? Yeah we have two of those. First SEC team to win a College World Series? Yeah that was us.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:53 pm to LSUforlife12
quote:
2-Georgia. No explanation needed. They've never won jack and Georgia is a state with all types of recruiting advantages in baseball and football.
We beat LSU last year. Oh well, guess beating you isn't winning 'jack'.
I get that.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:55 pm to LSUforlife12
I disagree with Georgia being in there. OK, few NC's in football but that could change; they field some damn good teams. and they suck in basketball and baseball. but they have some other teams that are perienial greats. like Tennis.
and the more I think about it maybe they should be in there. they suck at track and golf too.
so it's down to tennis. Georgia is a damn strong tennis school.
and the more I think about it maybe they should be in there. they suck at track and golf too.
so it's down to tennis. Georgia is a damn strong tennis school.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:55 pm to LSUforlife12
I think #3 would be Virginia Tech. They are basically the Aggies with less of a talent pool to pull from.
Posted on 10/13/14 at 9:58 pm to LSUforlife12
Arizona State cuz they have hot girls
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:31 pm to LSUforlife12
Another thread centered around a&m from a cajun. Water is still so fricking wet
Posted on 10/14/14 at 2:09 am to LSUforlife12
UVA has to be at the top with TAMU
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:06 am to LSUforlife12
Despite the obvious anti-TAMU trolling, I agree that we would qualify as an underachiever in many ways.
Listing UGA, however, proves that OP either is a transparent troll or has not yet seen his 15th birthday.
Listing UGA, however, proves that OP either is a transparent troll or has not yet seen his 15th birthday.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:10 am to LSUforlife12
Meh, Georgia beats us barely.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:29 am to LSUforlife12
I'd put Georgia at #1. A&M has always had to compete with Texas.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:31 am to LSUforlife12
Texas A&M won two football national championships in the offseason before we joined the SEC. That's pretty impressive imo.
Also, sorry about TCU's loss.
Also, sorry about TCU's loss.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:44 am to LSUforlife12
I don't disagree, though this is sort of an offseason thread.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 8:52 am to LSUforlife12
quote:
3-Arizona State. They should be more successful, and have had some bad years across several sports. Perpetual underachievers.
How is ASU number three? It's an over-sized school in the desert with a poor reputation and a big brother school in-state.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 10:19 am to LSUforlife12
quote:
1-Texas A&M. 1 title in the big 3 sports. Have all the resources in the world to be successful, are located in probably the best state for recruiting, and they still haven't won anything. They really haven't been competitive in basketball, baseball or football for the majority of their history. I think this is an easy number 1 choice, but I had a few reservations since they are lil bro of Texas.
2-Georgia. No explanation needed. They've never won jack and Georgia is a state with all types of recruiting advantages in baseball and football.
3-Arizona State. They should be more successful, and have had some bad years across several sports. Perpetual underachievers.
No to Georgia as an athletic program.
As far as football is concerned, there is Georgia, and then there is anyone else in the history of modern athletics. NO ONE compares to the unachieving prowess of the University of Georgia in the modern era.
LINK
Hasn't done shite in the lifetime of any fan that doesn't use the words "gobblygook" and "dagnabbit" in their regular daily vocabulary
Posted on 10/14/14 at 10:24 am to LSUforlife12
Are you talking about overall or football in general?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News