Started By
Message
re: SEC Top 5
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:42 pm to RiverDawg
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:42 pm to RiverDawg
I'm not sure why people get so high on Oregon every year. It really is the same story over and over again. They always run cupcakes off the field and struggle when they play a talented, physical team like Stanford.
If Oregon blows Stanford out this year, I'll be happy to heap praise on them as well. But until that happens, I don't see why this team is any different than the UO teams from 2009-2012.
If Oregon blows Stanford out this year, I'll be happy to heap praise on them as well. But until that happens, I don't see why this team is any different than the UO teams from 2009-2012.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:44 pm to RiverDawg
#1 Alabama over #2 Oregon
#6 Georgia over #5 Stanford
#9 Texas A&M over #12 UCLA
#10 LSU over #15 Washington
#13 South Carolina over #23 Arizona State
#6 Georgia over #5 Stanford
#9 Texas A&M over #12 UCLA
#10 LSU over #15 Washington
#13 South Carolina over #23 Arizona State
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:46 pm to theGarnetWay
A healthy Conner Shaw would smoke UCLA's defense. Davis would run wild on their D. Lets not forget about the Freak......Carolina would give A&M all they want.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:47 pm to RiverDawg
Bama
Oregon stacked this year
Oregon stacked this year
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:59 pm to RiverDawg
quote:
Carolina would give A&M all they want.
Both Jake Matthews and Cedric Ogbuehi would make the 2013 version of Clowney their bitch. The 2012 version...not so much.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:59 pm to cas4t
quote:
Oregon stacked this year
Even with DAT injured?
Posted on 10/2/13 at 6:07 pm to RiverDawg
quote:
Alabama vs Oregon
Georgia vs Stanford
LSU vs Washington
S. Carolina vs UCLA
A&M vs Arizona State
Better/more interesting matchups would be
Bama vs Oregon
LSU vs Stanford
UGA vs Washington
aTm vs UCLA
USC vs Arizona State
This post was edited on 10/2/13 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 10/2/13 at 6:10 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Both Jake Matthews and Cedric Ogbuehi would make the 2013 version of Clowney their bitch. The 2012 version...not so much.
His stats really aren't all that different from last year. The problem is, as much attention as 'The Hit' got him, it is biting him in the arse now. Teams are preparing for him and him alone and they're really effective. Why are they effective? Because no one else on D is helping. The Dline has a good # of sacks but they haven't become the threat they were supposed to be to take attention away from Clowney. As for the LBs / CBs? They're getting lit up.
Quite frankly if A&M-SC played this year I think it would look a lot like the A&M-Arky game. Maybe we could keep better pace because of Davis and a healthy Shaw.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 6:10 pm to RiverDawg
quote:
Alabama vs Oregon
Georgia vs Stanford
LSU vs Washington
S. Carolina vs UCLA
A&M vs Arizona State
Posted on 10/2/13 at 6:19 pm to theGarnetWay
Bama... don't see them stopping Oregon's offense this year.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 7:18 pm to RMFTBama
quote:
I'm not sure why people get so high on Oregon every year. It really is the same story over and over again. They always run cupcakes off the field and struggle when they play a talented, physical team like Stanford.
If Oregon blows Stanford out this year, I'll be happy to heap praise on them as well. But until that happens, I don't see why this team is any different than the UO teams from 2009-2012.
I think some people are quick to forget that Oregon dropped 52 in back to back years on very good Stanford teams in 2010 and 2011, as well as curb stomping #6 K State last year, and putting up 45 against #8 Wisconsin the year before. I think LSU and Alabama are the only teams with more top 10 wins over the last 3 years as Oregon, so it isn't like Oregon hasn't shown they can have success against good teams.
The biggest difference this year is they are just working with better players. Their recruiting rankings have been hovering around the lower teens the last few years, while they were more in the upper 20's in the years leading up to their NCG against Auburn.
I'd still take Alabama, but very close.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 7:55 pm to Surd
So UCLA's really arrived huh? Guess I need to catch a game.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 8:15 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Alabama vs Oregon
Depends on when the game is played.
Regular season game....Oregon wins
Nat Championship.....
1. with a month of saban preparation
Plus
2. a month off for Oregon to lose its offensive rhythm
Equals a win for Bama.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 8:42 pm to Billder
I'm going straight ticket SEC with the exception of Georgia-Stanford. I could see Georgia winning, but I think Stanford grinds it out and wins a close one.
Oregon-Alabama would be a rerun of the 2011 BCSCG all over again.
Oregon-Alabama would be a rerun of the 2011 BCSCG all over again.
Posted on 10/2/13 at 8:43 pm to RiverDawg
SEC goes 4-1
Only loss I see is UCLA
Only loss I see is UCLA
Posted on 10/3/13 at 12:14 am to RiverDawg
My dream week 1 Saturday line up
Posted on 10/3/13 at 12:25 am to RiverDawg
USCe, but Bama beats Oregon, Georgia beats Stanford, LSU beats Washington handily, USCe plays a tight game with UCLA, A&M beats ASU by around 10-12 points.
Posted on 10/3/13 at 12:27 am to RiverDawg
Alabama vs Oregon
Georgia vs Stanford
LSU vs Washington
S. Carolina vs UCLA
A&M vs Arizona State
Winners in bold
Georgia vs Stanford
LSU vs Washington
S. Carolina vs UCLA
A&M vs Arizona State
Winners in bold
Posted on 10/3/13 at 12:48 am to RiverDawg
Easily Georgia.
Not being facetious either.
Stanford has proven they can dominate high powered offenses with their defensive line , Georgia can't stop a flea on defense.
JMO
Not being facetious either.
Stanford has proven they can dominate high powered offenses with their defensive line , Georgia can't stop a flea on defense.
JMO
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News