Started By
Message
re: Twitter blowing up abuot DJ Fluker in Yahoo Sports investigation...
Posted on 9/12/13 at 9:02 am to chattabama
Posted on 9/12/13 at 9:02 am to chattabama
quote:
Y'all slipping envelopes of cash in those Bibles?
"offerings"
1
Posted on 9/12/13 at 9:03 am to dawg4lyfe
Seriously though, I doubt the NCAA does anything. They need to go after these agents that are fricking with the players. Schools should not be punished. 
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:03 am to dawg4lyfe
Anyone that harbors the view that Fluker may have taken money to help out family care to provide an opinion on this?
Per the Robinson article, supposedly from the email sent from the mother of one of Fluker's teammates:
"Annice promised me that she was taking the job at the hospital when she came in January and every month she had another Excuse why she couldn't take it."
(Annice, the article states, is the name of Fluker's mother)
Per the Robinson article, supposedly from the email sent from the mother of one of Fluker's teammates:
"Annice promised me that she was taking the job at the hospital when she came in January and every month she had another Excuse why she couldn't take it."
(Annice, the article states, is the name of Fluker's mother)
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:09 am to LockDown
The Fluker's mom stuff was only in there to show that Davis was known to be able to help with Fluker. The Annice stuff was clearly a loan between two people who knew one another. That is evidenced by the fact that DJ's mom paid back a portion of that loan and the lady was just looking for help collecting the rest of the money.
That issue is really irrelevant to DJ's eligibility. the only thing for Bama to be concerned with in that regard is what DJ did.
That issue is really irrelevant to DJ's eligibility. the only thing for Bama to be concerned with in that regard is what DJ did.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:24 am to bamasgot13
quote:
That is evidenced by the fact that DJ's mom paid back a portion of that loan and the lady was just looking for help collecting the rest of the money.
Why contact, of all people, Davis for that help?
quote:
That issue is really irrelevant to DJ's eligibility.
Way off of the mark.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 10:25 am
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:31 am to LockDown
quote:
Way off of the mark.
How so? A loan that was not facilitated by any representative of the university between the parents of two players who know one another is not an ncaa violation. loan. not a gift. loan.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:34 am to bamasgot13
Well seeing as how he graduated from here, he is unfortunately a representative of the U. Of A.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:39 am to bamasgot13
quote:
How so? A loan that was not facilitated by any representative of the university between the parents of two players who know one another is not an ncaa violation. loan. not a gift. loan.
Not a representative of the university.
A representative of a sports agency.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:40 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Well seeing as how he graduated from here, he is unfortunately a representative of the U. Of A.
Defining a Booster
Who is a Representative of Athletics Interests?
The NCAA broadly defines a "booster" as an individual, agency, entity or organization who is known by an institution to:
*Have participated in or been a member of an agency that promotes the institution's intercollegiate athletics program
*Have made financial contributions to the athletics department or a booster organization for the department
*Have been involved otherwise in promoting the institution's athletics program
*Have been a season ticket holder
*Have provided benefits to student-athletes or their relatives or friends
I'm an Alumnus, am I a Booster?
Not necessarily. Not all alumni are considered boosters. Likewise, a booster does not have to be a graduate. Boosters meet at least one of the criteria listed above. Thus, an individual who has ever made a financial contribution to the Athletics Department is a booster. In a general sense, a season ticket holder in any sport at any time is a booster.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:40 am to LockDown
Why is ESPN not eating this shite up? Mind blowing.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:42 am to LukeSidewalker
they didnt write the article
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:53 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
they didnt write the article
So? They always report other peoples shite, that's how they stay out of trouble.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:54 am to bamasgot13
He won't be seen as a booster because of where his motivation came from.
A booster is out for the benefit of the team.
Davis was out for the benefit of his wallet.
A booster is out for the benefit of the team.
Davis was out for the benefit of his wallet.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 10:57 am to CrimsonCoast
We're going to argue he wasn't a booster based on the grounds that he was doing this for multiple schools and for the purpose of his employer.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:03 am to partsman103
No sir , the Langham incident didnt happen until 93 sugar bowl and Stallings played Langham in the 93 season.
Gene Jelks was paid , by Auburn boosters in 92 to tell the press and NCAA he was payed whilst he played at Bama.
It happened during our title run , but the reason Auburn boosters did this was to take heat off Auburns Pat Dye pay for play scheme , you know the Eric Ramsey situation with 60 minutes.
Gene Jelks was paid , by Auburn boosters in 92 to tell the press and NCAA he was payed whilst he played at Bama.
It happened during our title run , but the reason Auburn boosters did this was to take heat off Auburns Pat Dye pay for play scheme , you know the Eric Ramsey situation with 60 minutes.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 11:14 am to partsman103
Partsman 103
C.R. says an individual leaked information to him.
Everyone is assuming it must be Luther Davis , but I doubt it's him.
I make no assumptions , but only throw this out for debate.
If this Email was shared between Davis & Fluker , NO ONE else has a right to read it or pass it to others.
Only Davis or Fluker could share these Emails with others legaly.
We know Fluker didn't share them , so either Davis is a POS , or someone shared these Emails illegally.
C.R. says an individual leaked information to him.
Everyone is assuming it must be Luther Davis , but I doubt it's him.
I make no assumptions , but only throw this out for debate.
If this Email was shared between Davis & Fluker , NO ONE else has a right to read it or pass it to others.
Only Davis or Fluker could share these Emails with others legaly.
We know Fluker didn't share them , so either Davis is a POS , or someone shared these Emails illegally.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 12:38 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
I think this might be my new automatic response to any bamasessed threads by LSU fans
Here is another one:
I was hoping I could find one in Auburn colors as well, but I haven't had much success.
Life at the top
Here is another one:
I was hoping I could find one in Auburn colors as well, but I haven't had much success.
Life at the top
Posted on 9/12/13 at 2:38 pm to chattabama
I just read through the article for the first time. It really isn't that bad, especially if Yahoo isn't turning over what they have.
This is going to mean nothing unless the NCAA can get someone to talk. All this is is a check to Luther Davis at the moment
The only real violations that are PROVEN with the text messages are during the month of december. We would only have to forfeit the championship games WHICH, the NCAA can't make us do. So I'm feeling much better about all of this
This is going to mean nothing unless the NCAA can get someone to talk. All this is is a check to Luther Davis at the moment
The only real violations that are PROVEN with the text messages are during the month of december. We would only have to forfeit the championship games WHICH, the NCAA can't make us do. So I'm feeling much better about all of this
Posted on 9/12/13 at 8:18 pm to Bama Bird
Didn't Bama have to vacate the Cotton Bowl win over Texas Tech?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 9:25 pm to JombieZombie
Please go play in the street all you want.
Page 7 of 8
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News