Started By
Message
re: Top 5 Offenses in SEC 2013
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:40 pm to Glory, Glory
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:40 pm to Glory, Glory
I'll read up on Ole Miss. Maybe I'll kick Florida off my list. That would delight me, actually.
Maybe LSU can kick off South Carolina..
Maybe LSU can kick off South Carolina..
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:40 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:quote:pot calling the kettle black
quote: You're being a homer. A&M is #1.
Um... by pointing out that the #1 offense in the SEC (by a long shot) returns essentially intact?
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:40 pm to deeprig9
The UGA fan thinks UGA has the best offense...shocking...
A&M will clearly have the best offense just like we had the best offense last year.
We averaged almost 100 more YPG and a TD more than UGA who finished 2nd to A&M. We return JFF, will still have the best OL in the conference, return our top back, get 2 more backs via transfer (both studs), and have the best WR class in the nation and in school history. Not only will A&M have the best offense, but we are going to top our previous year.
A&M will clearly have the best offense just like we had the best offense last year.
We averaged almost 100 more YPG and a TD more than UGA who finished 2nd to A&M. We return JFF, will still have the best OL in the conference, return our top back, get 2 more backs via transfer (both studs), and have the best WR class in the nation and in school history. Not only will A&M have the best offense, but we are going to top our previous year.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:45 pm to deeprig9
3 yards and a cloud of dust bitches!!!!
LSU number 1 for most 3 n outs
we are offense
LSU number 1 for most 3 n outs
we are offense
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:49 pm to Farmer1906
FWIW, I think A&M will statistically have the best offense again.
Hard to not rank them #1 when they have the Heisman winner plus countless weapons returning.
Hard to not rank them #1 when they have the Heisman winner plus countless weapons returning.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:50 pm to deeprig9
1a. A&M
1b. UGA
3. Bama
4. Ole Miss
5. USC
1b. UGA
3. Bama
4. Ole Miss
5. USC
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:51 pm to LewDawg
It's weird, you try to give a guy a compliment by putting him #3 on a very elite list, point out his great accomplishments, point out that he's so good that he single handedly got the team onto the list, despite having the worst record on the list, and they still aren't happy.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:54 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
FWIW, I think A&M will statistically have the best offense again.
Hard to not rank them #1 when they have the Heisman winner plus countless weapons returning.
If Johnny doesn't twist his ankle, you are probably right.
If one of the other quarterbacks gets hurt, those offenses are still competitive with weapons all over the field. A hurt quarterback might knock them out of the top 5, but it wouldn't completely destroy their season like it would for A&M, presumably.
Maybe A&M actually have fantastic players all over the field, there's no way of knowing because Johnny is doing everything.
I'm not putting them #1 when a bruised shoulder or sprained ankle for 1 player basically ruins your offense.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:56 pm to deeprig9
Bama 2 ? lol
stay offshore.
stay offshore.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:56 pm to deeprig9
quote:
#3 on a very elite list
Elite list my arse.
This isn't the SEC's top defenses.
After the top 5, the offenses are just anemic.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:59 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Maybe A&M actually have fantastic players all over the field, there's no way of knowing because Johnny is doing everything.
I'm not putting them #1 when a bruised shoulder or sprained ankle for 1 player basically ruins your offense.
So in one sentence you acknowledge you have no way of knowing if we have stars all over the field, and in the next you conclude that if Johnny goes down, all is for naught.
What am I missing here?
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:00 pm to deeprig9
quote:
A hurt quarterback might knock them out of the top 5, but it wouldn't completely destroy their season like it would for A&M, presumably.
Disagree, for Bama. With that O-line being gutted like it is, the only way the running game is going to get going is for AJ to start lighting up the secondary. Take that away, and Bama O is a shell of itself.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:01 pm to DWag215
quote:
What am I missing here?
The part where he's trolling.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:03 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Why is Ole Miss offense a top 5 offense in the conference for 2013? I want names and stats and stuff.
Contributors we lost:
AJ hawkins - starting center
Randall Mackey - slot/rb - around 700 total yards and 5 tds.
Jamal Mosely - TE. Did well down the stretch but didnt produce a whole lot. 15 catches, 118 yards, and 3 tds
Coming back:
Our entire 2 deep on the OL sans Hawkins
QBs
Bo Wallace and Barry Brunetti.
Bo Needs to improve on his decision making but in his first year as an SEC starter he completed 64% of his passes for right under 3000 yards and 22 tds. Like I said, the picks (17) gotta come down. He also had 400 yards rushing and 8 tds. Brunetti gives us that change of pace guy who's shifty and can complete the shorter passes in our offense.
WRs
We bring back our entire WR corps led by Donte Moncrief and will add some serious talent on NSD at the position.
Receptions/yards/tds
Moncrief - 66/979/10
Sanders - 39/504/4
Logan - 43/490/1
RBs:
A solid group who will also have added weaponry come NSD. Scott was the main ball carrier and the young guys will have to step up.
carries/yards/tds
Jeff Scott - 197/846/6 td *also caught 23 balls
Itavius Mathers - 27/208/1 td
Jaylen Walton - 23/118/1 td
I realize these arent the most eye-popping rushing stats but Mathers and Walton were true freshmen who I expect to really take a big step as sophomores.
I am not saying "OMGZ THE REBS HAVE THE BEST OFFENSE EVAR!1!!" so please dont take this as such.
I am just saying we should be considered in the top 5 or 6 going into the season. I expect big things out of Freeze's HUNH offense in year 2.
This post was edited on 1/26/13 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:04 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:With a OOC schedule of Rice, Sam Houston St., SMU & New Mexico & having Mizzou & Vandy as their cross conference foes there's no doubt IMO...
FWIW, I think A&M will statistically have the best offense again.
This post was edited on 1/26/13 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:07 pm to dallasga6
quote:
With a OOC schedule of Rice, Sam Houston St., SMU & New Mexico & having Mizzou & Vandy as their cross conference foes there's no doubt IMO...
Georgia fan making fun of another team's OOC schedule.
EPIC IRONY.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:08 pm to dallasga6
quote:
With a OOC schedule of Rice, Sam Houston St., SMU & New Mexico & having Mizzou & Vandy as their cross conference foes there's no doubt IMO...
Holy hell.
Make that TWO Heismans for JFF.
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:10 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
will still have the best OL in the conference
when did you have the best? I'm pretty sure the consensus on the best oline in the SEC was Bama last year. While A&M has great individual lineman, that doesn't mean they are the best. What makes a good oline a great one is scheme and chemistry.
Also JFF was running around and making plays, most of the time, because of a collapsed pocket. So IMO it is hard to say A&M has/had the best oline
Posted on 1/26/13 at 2:10 pm to PrivatePublic
Usually we schedule pretty well compared to most SEC teams.
Our OOC slate this past season wasn't even this shitty, though.
Our OOC slate this past season wasn't even this shitty, though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News