Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M lockeroom goes crazy after beating Ole Miss
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:26 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:26 pm to Whereisomaha
Think about it this way:
If your team, over the last 3 years you've been playing for them, has both a) Failed to come back from anything larger than a single digit deficit after halftime and b) blown 11 games in which you led by 9 or more at any point after halftime...you would probably be extremely excited.
The team realized that they aren't the "2nd half failures" anymore.
If your team, over the last 3 years you've been playing for them, has both a) Failed to come back from anything larger than a single digit deficit after halftime and b) blown 11 games in which you led by 9 or more at any point after halftime...you would probably be extremely excited.
The team realized that they aren't the "2nd half failures" anymore.
0
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:27 pm to Rebelgator
Nuclear-Powered Astro-Physics Cow College to you, Rebel. Now go study your Liberal Arts.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:30 pm to Smoke Ring
Its law school alligator to you, Ag.
Someone has to file suit when one of your book herders screws up.
Someone has to file suit when one of your book herders screws up.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:30 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
When was the last time you won the SEC? Just wondering...
This is season 1 for us.
Is there any way to spot us 80 to 90 years??
Seems to me it should be possible to win 1 by accident every 75 years or so. I could be wrong.
Save this post and get back to me in December of 2087. I will gladly say I was wrong if we haven't won one by then.
GIGEM!!!
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:31 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Seems to me it should be possible to win 1 by accident every 75 years or so. I could be wrong.
Bet you won't have 6 like us
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:31 pm to Tridentds
quote:Who TF cares?
ts law school alligator to you
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:32 pm to Whereisomaha
Okay, Bet Accepted!
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:32 pm to 13-0 Branding Iron
quote:SIX? Wow. You would think with that many you could have beaten Texas A&M at least once.
Bet you won't have 6 like us
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:33 pm to 13-0 Branding Iron
The frick are the two words you weren't smart enough to spell out. You aren't sexting Rick Perry, spell words.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:36 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:Well get the strippers ready dude, 'cause I got a feelin y'all are about to kick the shite out of the 2010 National Champs.
If and when we finally win an SEC game our stadium will go full orgy
Freeze has got you boys fighting hard.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:37 pm to Tds & Beer
Guess I'll be rooting for ol miss now!
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:37 pm to gatorprincess815
quote:
I wonder how they would react to beating Bama. someone make a gif please.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:38 pm to Rebelgator
Lawyers' salaries:
Going down like Rebelgator since 2007
Going down like Rebelgator since 2007
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:38 pm to Rebelgator
quote:Look junior, you do know that Texas A&M is the #1 Pet E and Oil Geology school in the world, right? As in the worlds most lucrative business? Many of us are in oil, own land with oil and are otherwise associated with the oil business.
Someone has to file suit when one of your book herders screws up.
We have armies of lawyers working for us that we hire and fire at will. We can also afford better lawyers than the ones from florida's law school.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:41 pm to Al Bundy Bulldog
your screen name namesake Al Bundy was still pumped about scoring 4 TDs in a high school football game 30 years after the fact.
learn to troll better dipshit
learn to troll better dipshit
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:44 pm to 13-0 Branding Iron
quote:
Hey hillbilly, are you aware that you lost by 48 points to Texas A&M and got your name in the SEC record book as the worst defense in terms of yards allowed EVER in SEC HISTORY?
Name one thing in what he said that was not accurate.
In fact he was defending you.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:46 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Pot, meet kettle.
Ex: Msu vs Auburn
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:48 pm to Rebelgator
So, you're in law school? Hummm... Can I give you a little quiz?
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:53 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:That we are "happy with anything".
Name one thing in what he said that was not accurate
The only thing I am happy with so far this season is destroying Arkansas for an SEC total offense record and getting ranked, which looked like a longshot coming in with different systems on both sides of the ball and a tough schedule... I mean, besides Arkansas.
Posted on 10/10/12 at 3:54 pm to Rebelgator
Rebelgator:
The State of Euphoria has a large native population. In 2001, the legislature passed a law, the Euphoric Land Act, which allowed the state to seize all lands from the native people and declare it property of the state. Under the Euphoric Land Act, people could apply to the legislature for ownership of the land, and the legislature had the discretion to award the land to certain individuals. During 2002, most of the seized land was awarded to individuals who had given large bribes to various members of the Euphoria legislature. In 2004, the people of Euphoria lodged their objection by voting out every incumbent who was up for re-election. In 2004, the legislature repealed the Euphoric Land Act. In 2003, Parker purchased a tract of land from the developer who received it under the land act. In 2004, he agreed to sell the land to Dewey. After the legislature repealed the law and voided all transactions under it. Dewey refused to purchase the property, claiming that Parker did not have good title to the land. Parker sues in federal court to enforce the contract. Which of the following statements is most accurate?
a. The case will be dismissed, because a federal court has no authority to nullify a state law.
b. Parker will prevail, because the 2004 law unconstitutionally impairs his rights under the Contracts Clause.
c. Dewey will prevail, because the 2001 law is unconstitutional and therefore, Parker does not really own the land
d. The case will be dismissed as moot, because the 2001 law was probably unconstitutional, but it has since been repealed.
The State of Euphoria has a large native population. In 2001, the legislature passed a law, the Euphoric Land Act, which allowed the state to seize all lands from the native people and declare it property of the state. Under the Euphoric Land Act, people could apply to the legislature for ownership of the land, and the legislature had the discretion to award the land to certain individuals. During 2002, most of the seized land was awarded to individuals who had given large bribes to various members of the Euphoria legislature. In 2004, the people of Euphoria lodged their objection by voting out every incumbent who was up for re-election. In 2004, the legislature repealed the Euphoric Land Act. In 2003, Parker purchased a tract of land from the developer who received it under the land act. In 2004, he agreed to sell the land to Dewey. After the legislature repealed the law and voided all transactions under it. Dewey refused to purchase the property, claiming that Parker did not have good title to the land. Parker sues in federal court to enforce the contract. Which of the following statements is most accurate?
a. The case will be dismissed, because a federal court has no authority to nullify a state law.
b. Parker will prevail, because the 2004 law unconstitutionally impairs his rights under the Contracts Clause.
c. Dewey will prevail, because the 2001 law is unconstitutional and therefore, Parker does not really own the land
d. The case will be dismissed as moot, because the 2001 law was probably unconstitutional, but it has since been repealed.
This post was edited on 10/10/12 at 3:55 pm
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News