Started By
Message
USC Men's programs 15-73 since January 1, 2025 (Football, Basketball, and Baseball)
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:23 am
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:23 am
Heard that on xm this morning
I am sorry baws - that's rough
I am sorry baws - that's rough
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 11:25 am
10
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:25 am to thelawnwranglers
Damn that is rough. 
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:43 am to thelawnwranglers
Vs power 4, yeah its definitely rough. but we stay strong.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:46 am to thelawnwranglers
No skin off my back. I do not contribute in any way and made the much more financially responsible decision of just putting more of my disposable income into my 401K instead.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 11:50 am to GamecockUltimate
quote:
yeah its definitely rough. but we stay strong.
Wow, that’s ghey as frick
Stay strong while getting clubbed to death like a baby seal
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:05 pm to cajunbama
Baby seals have more moxie
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:34 pm to thelawnwranglers
USC was a prime motivator in nuking the PAC-12. Which, while it wasn't doing fantastic, was mildly competitive and viable. Now they are nothing special in a Big 10 where almost everyone is outspending them.
Take the expansion teams of the SEC. Arkansas knew the SWC was about to go under the and Big 8 wouldn't pick them. South Carolina was an indie and saw the writing on the wall. Then Mizzou and A&M saw the writing on the wall (in giant letters) that the Big 12 was floundering and jumped. A few years later Oklahoma and Texas realized that ruling a lousy conference was worse than being part of a good one.
All of those schools, despite suffering some short term damage (Arkansas and USCe left behind some really good rivalries) knew they would do better.
USC is just dangling in the breeze now.
Take the expansion teams of the SEC. Arkansas knew the SWC was about to go under the and Big 8 wouldn't pick them. South Carolina was an indie and saw the writing on the wall. Then Mizzou and A&M saw the writing on the wall (in giant letters) that the Big 12 was floundering and jumped. A few years later Oklahoma and Texas realized that ruling a lousy conference was worse than being part of a good one.
All of those schools, despite suffering some short term damage (Arkansas and USCe left behind some really good rivalries) knew they would do better.
USC is just dangling in the breeze now.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 12:47 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Wow, that’s ghey as frick
Stay strong while getting clubbed to death like a baby seal
what am I supposed to do about it? I don't get to play the games, or coach the teams?
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:06 pm to Arksulli
quote:
USC was a prime motivator in nuking the PAC-12. Which, while it wasn't doing fantastic, was mildly competitive and viable. Now they are nothing special in a Big 10 where almost everyone is outspending them.
OP is making the mistake of referring to South Carolina as USC.
USC is always Southern Cal to the normal populous outside here.
This post was edited on 3/4/26 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:29 pm to Jrv2damac
Even a room temperature IQ individual can figure out which one is being discussed with context
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:31 pm to CNB
That doesn’t make it correct.
And apologize to Arksulli for saying that about him.
And apologize to Arksulli for saying that about him.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:42 pm to Jrv2damac
That’s yalls problem not ours
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:50 pm to Arksulli
quote:
Take the expansion teams of the SEC. Arkansas knew the SWC was about to go under the and Big 8 wouldn't pick them. South Carolina was an indie and saw the writing on the wall. Then Mizzou and A&M saw the writing on the wall (in giant letters) that the Big 12 was floundering and jumped. A few years later Oklahoma and Texas realized A&M and Mizzou did the smart thing and decided to beg for an invitation to the SEC
FIFY
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:51 pm to thelawnwranglers
Sold their souls for a women’s basketball program.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 1:51 pm to WildcatMike
Just one idiot athletic director, actually
Posted on 3/4/26 at 2:02 pm to CNB
Ray tanners tenure has to go down as one of if not the worst mismanagements of an athletic department in recent memory. Went from championship level baseball and SEC contenders in football to dumpster juice in all three men’s sports. It all starts with South Carolina nepotism/good old boy system shite whatever you wanna call it. Sucks.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 2:10 pm to CNB
Tell him you’re sorry.
Posted on 3/4/26 at 2:45 pm to thelawnwranglers
Posted on 3/4/26 at 2:55 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
That doesn’t make it correct.
And apologize to Arksulli for saying that about him.
Hey so it actually was correct. SEC Rant mainboard topics are related to SEC only. Their is only one USC in the SEC thus it was a correct usage of USC.
No apologies needed
Posted on 3/4/26 at 3:29 pm to GamecockUltimate
Arksulli is a nice poster.
If you were nicer, you wouldn’t be 15-73 in those sports since 2025.
If you were nicer, you wouldn’t be 15-73 in those sports since 2025.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News