Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Winningest SEC Teams by decade since 60s

Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
Posted by Go Go Gata
Member since Oct 2016
4645 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
This post was edited on 2/7/26 at 12:26 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
83784 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:30 pm to
Big 3
Posted by Bigbens42
Trussvegas
Member since Nov 2013
15274 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:13 pm to
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89897 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Big 3




Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89897 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.


you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.

And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
21254 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:01 pm to
Is there a trophy for that?
Posted by TailbackU
ATL
Member since Oct 2005
13213 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.



We started the decade off 0-6 in the SEC in 1980 which hurt us as far as the entire decade. But from 83-89 we were the class of the league for sure. 4 titles in 7 seasons.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
4696 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.

And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.


Not sure I'd agree with that. Back in those days, winning a championship was more arbitrary. A weak schedule was helpful and bowl tie-ins/selections had a big influence on the voting outcome. Passing the eye test was important, because in the end it was a beauty contest. Votes still matter, but not nearly as much.
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
6953 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:03 pm to
Well 80s Auburn did that (1983).
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
9977 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:08 pm to
No L3U? List is shite!!
Posted by FahQGump
Auburn, Al
Member since Dec 2021
1754 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:09 pm to
Great, now you 3 close your eyes and tug to your right
Posted by Bigbens42
Trussvegas
Member since Nov 2013
15274 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it. And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.


We probably got boned in 83 so there’s that.
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3772 posts
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:50 pm to
Why stop there? They played in 1950s too
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter