Started By
Message
Winningest SEC Teams by decade since 60s
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:25 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 2/7/26 at 12:26 pm
2
Posted on 2/7/26 at 12:30 pm to Go Go Gata
Big 3
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:13 pm to TideSaint
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:15 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Big 3
Posted on 2/7/26 at 1:25 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.
And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:01 pm to Go Go Gata
Is there a trophy for that?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:50 pm to Bigbens42
quote:
We’d have a solid case for being the class of the SEC in the 80s with our 4 SEC titles were it not for the fact it took us a couple of years to get rolling with Dye.
We started the decade off 0-6 in the SEC in 1980 which hurt us as far as the entire decade. But from 83-89 we were the class of the league for sure. 4 titles in 7 seasons.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:05 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
you can't be the class of any decade without having won a national title in it.
And that's not talking shite either, just seems like it'd kind of be a prerequisite.
Not sure I'd agree with that. Back in those days, winning a championship was more arbitrary. A weak schedule was helpful and bowl tie-ins/selections had a big influence on the voting outcome. Passing the eye test was important, because in the end it was a beauty contest. Votes still matter, but not nearly as much.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News