Started By
Message
Texas Tech billionaire and NIL... interesting read
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:45 am
Posted on 11/4/25 at 4:45 am
LINK
It's funny when commissioners are quoted "he doesn't understand the business of football", mkay a billionaire, former college football player, heavy donor I think he does..he's exactly what these administrations are afraid of
It's funny when commissioners are quoted "he doesn't understand the business of football", mkay a billionaire, former college football player, heavy donor I think he does..he's exactly what these administrations are afraid of
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:01 am to Tropicofcapricorn
Paywalled but TT is certainly improving all around and it’s nice to have a billionaire help with it. It’s not good for CFB however because you become a league of haves/havenots
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:31 am to Tropicofcapricorn
Sankey's arrogance is unmatched.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:43 am to Tropicofcapricorn
He also wants shared TV revenue between conferences by proposing anti trust legislation to allow revenue sharing.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:49 am to idlewatcher
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:42 am to Tropicofcapricorn
Total PR puff piece. His only concern is leveling the playing field for Texas Tech, since being in the Big XII puts it at a distinct disadvantage.
quote:The powerhouse conferences spend money on women's sports, its just that they don't share that money with the Texas Tech's of the world. He wants the NCAA, or some other body, to take everyone's football TV rights and sell it one package, then distribute it in a way where the little schools get more than they currently do. His justification for this (which none of these puff pieces question) is that pooling rights will result in a bigger pie, so the big boys will get more than they do now, but that's complete speculation, and frankly, probably qualifies as delusional (if he even believes it). He's just upset that he won't be able to buy a team if the House settlement is implemented through Congressional legislation.
Mr. Campbell’s first target is to modernize the Sports Broadcasting Act, which was written in 1961, to allow colleges to pool their media rights as the National Football League and other professional leagues do.
The way the system currently works is that powerhouse conferences — the Big Ten, the Southeastern Conference, the Big 12 and the Atlantic Coast Conference — each sell the rights to their games to various television networks then divided up among their schools. But the television money often ends up going to the football and basketball programs and not spread among lower-profile sports.
If those so-called Power 4 conferences pooled their media rights, Mr. Campbell said, they could then find networks willing to pay to broadcast football games but offer networks and streaming platforms packages in less-watched sports like volleyball and field hockey. This arrangement could spread media revenue across a school’s sport teams.
quote:His real goal here isn't pursuing this absurd rights pooling scheme, it's derailing the House settlement so that he can keep buying a team through NIL.
They also knew the sun was setting on the anything-goes phase of the athlete acquisitions when the House v. N.C.A.A. antitrust lawsuit settlement went into effect over the summer. The settlement essentially limits the amount that schools can pay athletes across all sports each year to $20.5 million.
Many schools do not even come close to spending that amount, but it will mean a big adjustment at Texas Tech. Mr. Campbell and his collective spent $55 million paying Texas Tech athletes for this school year alone.
“We saw a window where the House settlement was coming, but N.I.L. in its Wild West form still existed,” Mr. Campbell said.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:50 am to twk
I'm going to have to agree with twk. Campbell is proposing all sorts of interesting gyrations that all sound potentially reasonable, although you get lost and fall asleep while trying to digest it.
If Campbell were a Texas grad (for example) he wouldn't have thought of any of this shite.
Campbell is just trying to keep Texas Tech relevant. I'm sorry after you boil everything out - that's all it is.
If Campbell were a Texas grad (for example) he wouldn't have thought of any of this shite.
Campbell is just trying to keep Texas Tech relevant. I'm sorry after you boil everything out - that's all it is.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:55 am to MtVernon
Tech is screwed if the B1G/SEC take over. That is what the Twelve and ACC are afraid of. It is basically the Big 2 P4 at this point
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:59 am to NobodyImportant
Campbell is not afraid that "people like him are ruining college sports". What he is afraid of is giving away a fortune every year to keep Texas Tech in the picture.
He can do this for awhile. Heck, he could do it for a good long time. But he's screwing his family, his worth, and his decendants if he eternally flushes billions on Texas Tech sports.
He can do this for awhile. Heck, he could do it for a good long time. But he's screwing his family, his worth, and his decendants if he eternally flushes billions on Texas Tech sports.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:04 am to MtVernon
Tech will always be at a disadvantage geographically to compete with the big fish but they can still be relevant in the Big XII. They aren’t ever going to be a legacy program
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:15 am to Tropicofcapricorn
Yeah, my sister and brother in law are TT alums and actually know this guy. Sankey is an idiot if he thinks this dude doesn't know how college football works. He knows exactly how it works and that's why he cut a check for over $28MM to TT to "go get NFL caliber" players. My brother in law goes to most of the games and he said the upgrade in talent they now have on the team is very noticeable. And the scary thing is, that's not the last check he's going to cut to the school. There's a lot more coming.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:24 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Paywalled but TT is certainly improving all around and it’s nice to have a billionaire help with it. It’s not good for CFB however because you become a league of haves/havenots
We already had that prior to NIL. this just changes who the "haves" are.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:24 am to NWLA_Bama
quote:Not if the House settlement is implemented. If that happens, he can give Tech all the money he wants, but they can only spend $20.5 million on revenue sharing, and any NIL deals will have to pass the fair market value test. They've built all the facilities that they can in Lubbock. If they can't spend $55 million on NIL (which they won't if House gets implemented), then they are back to being an isolated school in a lower tier conference.
Yeah, my sister and brother in law are TT alums and actually know this guy. Sankey is an idiot if he thinks this dude doesn't know how college football works. He knows exactly how it works and that's why he cut a check for over $28MM to TT to "go get NFL caliber" players. My brother in law goes to most of the games and he said the upgrade in talent they now have on the team is very noticeable. And the scary thing is, that's not the last check he's going to cut to the school. There's a lot more coming.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:27 am to idlewatcher
quote:
It’s not good for CFB however because you become a league of haves/havenots
It was that before NIL. Now all the haves are pissed that other schools can compete. Tech and is a prime example of that.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:28 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Paywalled but TT is certainly improving all around and it’s nice to have a billionaire help with it. It’s not good for CFB however because you become a league of haves/havenots
At least for football, the SEC has had a caste system of haves vs have nots for decades. I think the last non-Big 6 team to even share a championship in football was Kentucky back in the 70s.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:44 am to ob1pimpbobi
quote:
Now all the haves are pissed that other schools can compete.
I don’t agree with this statement. Doesn’t bother me that he is willing to spend big $$ on Tech sports. Campbell wants so-called equality by making the government pool tv rights. Last thing we need is our federal government more involved in college sports.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:57 am to Taurus 357
quote:
Tech will always be at a disadvantage geographically to compete with the big fish but they can still be relevant in the Big XII. They aren’t ever going to be a legacy program
Geography doesn't matter. Paying players matters
The state of Texas has ALOT of money. UT has alot of money to stay at the top of the SEC. Look how well SMU is doing.
It's the reality of the sport now
Posted on 11/4/25 at 9:02 am to ob1pimpbobi
quote:
It was that before NIL. Now all the haves are pissed that other schools can compete.
This is wrong.
Before, we had haves, have nots, and cheaters.
The have nots just pretty much laid low and did as best they could.
The haves were typically AAU schools and although they would cross the line, they tried to control for reputation sake.
The cheaters were your Alabamas, your LSUs, and Oklahomas who didn't give a flying frick about reputation or any kind of dignitary bullshite. They and their non-alumnus fans just wanted to win at footbawl.
The problem today is your cheaters can't compete with the haves, and they are pissed about it.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 9:02 am to twk
Nah, he puts just as much money into softball, and is a huge contributor to Olympic athletes training. Put aside your tech bias, brother.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 9:10 am to EV
quote:
Geography doesn't matter. Paying players matters
Let's think about this.
Paying players, combined with good coaching, will win games - I agree.
But no matter how great Texas Tech becomes - 100,000 people aren't driving to Lubbock Texas for football games.
Texas Tech is a 60,000 seater at best. Hell, their students go to games for free. Why?
Because it's way the frick out there. Their grads are in DFW at best, never mind Houston or San Antonio.
What conference wants a team with 50k in the stands?
Popular
Back to top

7






