Started By
Message
USC is jumping Bama tonight
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:30 pm
You heard it here first.
23
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:44 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
You heard it here first.
The the committee can do away with the head to head talking point.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:47 pm to Lg
quote:
The the committee can do away with the head to head talking point.
Nah, the goal posts will be moved back in favor of the head to head next year.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:50 pm to Lg
They went away with P5 teams winning conference championships while going undefeated. What makes you think the narrative you're clinging to should stick?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:54 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
You heard it here first.
They aren't.
The question is.....does Miami fall below the SEC teams?
Bama will be the top 3 loss SEC team.
Ole Miss has an argument to be above Bama but USC does not. Ole Miss' argument over Bama is very weak though so it will be Bama or Miami (maybe SMU if Clemson wins).
It will not be USC.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:55 pm to Jon Ham
Could happen. If so, happy for them and hope they kick arse. Same with Ole Miss. We have as good a case as anyone else but we didn't earn shite.
If Miami is still ahead of all of us then I hope they give up 63 points and play the same way they've played the entire season.
If Miami is still ahead of all of us then I hope they give up 63 points and play the same way they've played the entire season.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:56 pm to jangalang
quote:
They went away with P5 teams winning conference championships while going undefeated.
But they also stipulated it was because said team was missing their starting qb and that injuries to prominent players would be a factor.
So what's the spin on head to head?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:01 pm to Lg
There is plenty. Bama was at home and deserved to lose after botching recovering the onside kick.
Bama hasnt proven to be a road warrior afterall. 1-3?
Bama hasnt proven to be a road warrior afterall. 1-3?
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:02 pm to jangalang
quote:
Bama was at home and deserved to lose after botching recovering the onside kick.
Toe be fair I wanted to kill everyone on our staff and roster initially and then I watched the replay of the kick and it may have been the most uncatchable onside kick I've ever seen. Mother fricker put some black magic on that damn sidewinder.
If he can guarantee that he'll do that on every kickoff in the playoffs then I say we forfeit our bid and let Carolina go.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:03 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Could happen. If so, happy for them and hope they kick arse. Same with Ole Miss. We have as good a case as anyone else but we didn't earn shite.
If Miami is still ahead of all of us then I hope they give up 63 points and play the same way they've played the entire season.
I couldn't agree more. If they decide to put South Carolina, or Ole Miss, in over Bama, I'm fine with that.
I wouldn't be surprised to see them put two loss Miami in because that is the easiest path; and I would expect Miami to get boat-raced in the first round wherever they end up. They have zero wins against Top 25 opponents.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:08 pm to Jon Ham
It is what it is.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:08 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
You heard it here first.
Do you know a guy?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:09 pm to TS1926
quote:
I couldn't agree more. If they decide to put South Carolina, or Ole Miss, in over Bama, I'm fine with that.
Same. Shouldn't have laid a big fat egg in Norman.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:14 pm to Lg
quote:what was the reason the committee moved Alabama ahead of Tennessee week 15 in 2022 even though Vols won in Knox?
So what's the spin on head to head?
both teams 10-2 - Tide #5 Vols #6 -
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:15 pm to 1801
quote:
what was the reason the committee moved Alabama ahead of Tennessee week 15 in 2022
The logo on their helmets...
Remind me, who owned the head to head that year?
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:16 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
You heard it here first.
Actually didn't hear it here 1st. It's literally been all over the internetz
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:19 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
The logo on their helmets...
Remind me, who owned the head to head that year?
Tennessee with a different QB.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:20 pm to 3down10
quote:
Tennessee with a different QB.
Oh Ok.
So the fact that SC had a different QB in the 2nd half vs Lsu shouldn't matter either?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:23 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
So the fact that SC had a different QB in the 2nd half vs Lsu shouldn't matter either?
What?
FSU's QB was done for the year took them out of contention(along with a shitty schedule and an already shaky season).
Tennesse's QB was done for the year took them out of contention.
And from that you get this weird idea that you should be given a win over a team because you QB was injured for half of it?
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:25 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Same. Shouldn't have laid a big fat egg in Norman.
This loss is unfathomable. I can sort of get the Vanderbilt loss coming off the big win over Georgia. I can get losing at UT but losing to a horrible OU team that has absolutely no passing game is a head scratcher.
It's similar to Ohio State's loss to a mediocre Iowa team 55-17 a few years back.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News