Started By
Message
re: Texas record vs. SEC teams
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:29 pm to charliethehun
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:29 pm to charliethehun
quote:
If you take the last 10 years, multiply the 1980’s, count 2X the Covid year and add PI
The series is about even
Or you could take everything since the first scholarship limitation requirement in 1973.
That makes the series 14-15 in the wrong direction. (1973-2011)
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 5:31 pm
1
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:30 pm to GoGators1995
Post Texas A&M vs Texas in modern era ( since 1974) very different story.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Maybe the younger SEC fans just need to understand, relish, celebrate, and dwell on how bad A&M football was before the mid 1970s. It’s historical fact.
A&M didn’t have the support that it enjoys now.
A&M didn’t have the support that it enjoys now.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:35 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Look at last 50-60 years. Not sure 1887 through 1935 is a big deal.
Goalposts.
Aggy been talking about only the last four years of the LSU game.
Can we move the posts anymore?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:35 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
quote:
Post Texas A&M vs Texas in modern era ( since 1974) very different story.
lol I knew, before even reading this thread, that an aggie would arbitrarily pick a year and proclaim "Only this year and forward matters" lmao. clockwork.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:35 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
Aggies muttering about muh 1974. 
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:38 pm to ForgetTheRest
quote:Print the cups!!!
Our win percentage vs them is higher than yours.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:39 pm to tigersbh
76-37-5
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:40 pm to ForgetTheRest
quote:
Our win percentage vs them is higher than yours.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 6:53 pm to tigersbh
SC is 1-0 hell yeah lol.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:08 pm to Kenny Loftin
quote:Especially when you consider a real military academy that was also all male at the time (West Point, Army) managed to win a natty during WWII. Lulz
They're about to flood this thread by saying that the only reason they were bad is because they were an all-male school that didn't have females until the 1960s (why that would help the football team, I'm not sure)
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:09 pm to tigersbh
Yep they owned us in the early 1900’s. Before scholarship limitations
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:13 pm to ColoradoAg
Every time someone points out they have only won 50% of the games since the 70’s
[/url] [
[/url] [Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:27 pm to Old Sarge
Why not use Big 12 record?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:30 pm to PerrillouxToTexas
Kicking UTrans’s arse in 2024 will suffice
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:37 pm to Tridentds
quote:
Look at last 50-60 years. Not sure 1887 through 1935 is a big deal.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:38 pm to JAXTiger16
aTm has never been relevant
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:43 pm to tigersbh
Won’t be long and they’ll have a losing record to LSU, Georgia, Bama and Tennessee, etc. as well
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:44 pm to 49 to nada
quote:
Especially when you consider a real military academy that was also all male at the time (West Point, Army) managed to win a natty during WWII. Lulz
During World War II, the academies basically got to choose any 2 players from every other school. I notice you left that part out.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:46 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Why didn’t A&M get to do that?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News