Started By
Message
Locked On Auburn
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:32 am
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:32 am
Anyone catch the podcast today?
Jake Crain seems like a dick.

Jake Crain seems like a dick.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:37 am to bawbarn
I have seen some chatter about that podcast.
Apparently he was talking down to Charlie5 or something.
Link?
Apparently he was talking down to Charlie5 or something.
Link?
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:41 am to jangalang
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:49 am to bawbarn
It was basically a video version of Jang vs. Chex.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:57 am to AUstar
That link is from last year.
So there is some history....
Or something
So there is some history....
Or something
Posted on 10/5/23 at 11:58 am to jangalang
Posted on 10/5/23 at 12:15 pm to bawbarn
The YouTube link is definitely better for the visuals 

Posted on 10/5/23 at 12:18 pm to AUWDE
I listened for like 5 minutes and turned it off.
That is NOT entertainment.
That is NOT entertainment.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:12 pm to bawbarn
Is that the same guy that cried over a wr coach
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:14 pm to bawbarn
quote:
Jake Crain seems like a dick.
I really despise his attitude. He comes across as arrogant and entitled on twitter and is unfortunately a big Auburn homer.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:23 pm to bawbarn
Agree. Jake Crain has been known to be a douche for a long time. FTR, I do like LOA and Zac. He just added Jake as a weekly guest one or two months ago. Shouldn`t have imo.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:42 pm to bawbarn
quote:
Jake Crain seems like a dick.
I like their podcast, but yes and his brother is worse than he is.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:45 pm to jvilletiger25
Am I supposed to know who this Charlie5 guy is?
Crain coming off as an insecure bitch boy in this
Crain coming off as an insecure bitch boy in this

This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 10/5/23 at 2:11 pm to atwitsendAU
Yeah, Zac does a pretty good job. I enjoy his podcast when I get around to listening.
I’ve heard Jake Crain on there a couple times and he tries too hard to be a combination of Jim Rome and Cowherd. Today he was just over the top with the message board guy.
I’ve heard Jake Crain on there a couple times and he tries too hard to be a combination of Jim Rome and Cowherd. Today he was just over the top with the message board guy.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 2:18 pm to Weagle25
Charlie5 is literally like one of us. He’s just a message board poster on one (or multiple) paid sites.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 2:40 pm to AA7
They called him a “message board legend”
Never heard of him
Never heard of him
Posted on 10/5/23 at 4:04 pm to bawbarn
I listened to it this morning on the drive to work.
I agree, i have always like Crain and Company commentary on youtube but he did come off as a complete a-hole.
I don't don't know Charlie5 from Adam's house cat but he seemed like a genuine guy who could be anyone of us with an opinion on the game.
I think ole C5 thought it was going to be a friendly debate and Jake wanted to decapitate the guy from the start.
I agree, i have always like Crain and Company commentary on youtube but he did come off as a complete a-hole.
I don't don't know Charlie5 from Adam's house cat but he seemed like a genuine guy who could be anyone of us with an opinion on the game.
I think ole C5 thought it was going to be a friendly debate and Jake wanted to decapitate the guy from the start.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 4:08 pm to bigtiger440
Jake has some honest points.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 5:02 pm to 88TIger
All he did was yell “IF YOU DONT KNOW SCHEME YOU CANT TALK BALL”
And Charlie’s response would be “Here’s the argument you laid out, and here are my counter points.
And Crain would respond with “BUT WHATS AN OVER ALIGNMENT”
And Charlie would point out that it had nothing to do with the argument being made.
Crain had some complex that Charlie had to prove his worth to even be in the debate which is always a shitty argument. If you can’t counter the guys argument and turn to making the guy prove “he knows ball”, then you lost the argument. It’s essentially like arguing with Corch. A guy with a chip on his shoulder trying to prove how much they know about football to everybody.
The only point I thought Crain was winning on was the whole Safety chipping Bowers thing. But in the end of that I think Charlie just kept saying safety on that situation because Puckett would’ve been the guy to chip Bowers on the particular play they were talking about.
And Charlie’s response would be “Here’s the argument you laid out, and here are my counter points.
And Crain would respond with “BUT WHATS AN OVER ALIGNMENT”
And Charlie would point out that it had nothing to do with the argument being made.
Crain had some complex that Charlie had to prove his worth to even be in the debate which is always a shitty argument. If you can’t counter the guys argument and turn to making the guy prove “he knows ball”, then you lost the argument. It’s essentially like arguing with Corch. A guy with a chip on his shoulder trying to prove how much they know about football to everybody.
The only point I thought Crain was winning on was the whole Safety chipping Bowers thing. But in the end of that I think Charlie just kept saying safety on that situation because Puckett would’ve been the guy to chip Bowers on the particular play they were talking about.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 5:14 pm to jangalang
quote:
I listened for like 5 minutes and turned it off.
I did about 6mins. Its a visual representation of what goes on here.
I will just go back to what I have lived by since I have become a grown up. Just a few years ago. If what you are doing is not working, you need to do something else. And thats how I see the Bowers argument.
We should have kept doing something else, till he didnt beat us. Even if someone else beat us, it should not have been him. That was a failure in any scheme and before anyone asks, No I dont know enough about scheme to know what to do
We shoul have doubled him. If that didnt work, we should have tripled him. If that didnt work, we should have tackled him coming off the line and and had our biggest player sit on his back. If that didnt work, we should have got the Auburn sniper involved
You cant just sit there and let him drag his balls over your face. And that is exactly what our coaching staff allowed to happen
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
