Started By
Message
locked post

Preferred Permanent Rivals

Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:11 am
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9889 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:11 am
With Texas and OU officially coming in 2024, the SEC appears ready to move to a division-less system with each school having three permanent rivals. Who do you prefer?

Here’s the best I could come up with:

1. Mizzou: Arkansas, Oklahoma, South Carolina
2. Arkansas: Mizzou, Texas, Oklahoma
3. Oklahoma: Texas, Mizzou, Arkansas
4. Texas: Oklahoma, A&M, Arkansas
5. A&M: LSU, Texas, Miss St
6. LSU: A&M, Ole Miss, Florida
7. Ole Miss: Miss St, LSU, Alabama
8. Miss St: Ole Miss, A&M, Auburn
9. Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, Ole Miss
10. Auburn: Alabama, Georgia, Miss St
11. Vandy: South Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee
12. Tennessee: Kentucky, Alabama, Vandy
13. Kentucky: Tennessee, Vandy, Florida
14. South Carolina: Vandy, Georgia, Mizzou
15. Georgia: Florida, Auburn, South Carolina
16. Florida: Georgia, LSU, Kentucky
Posted by Hback
Member since Aug 2017
11582 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:12 am to
Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, State
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
20297 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, Ole Miss

Switch Ole Miss for MSU. Didn't really pay attention to the others.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
38671 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:13 am to
quote:

6. LSU: Auburn, Alabama, Florida
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47330 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:13 am to
I believe they will move to 1 permanent rival
Posted by XWing atAliciousness
Member since Jan 2018
8623 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Texas: Oklahoma, A&M, Arkansas
Looks right to me
Posted by blairjs
Georgia
Member since May 2014
305 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:17 am to
Removing Miss State from Auburn. It should be Florida or even Tennessee over Miss St.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26443 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, State


Agreed. First two are obvious. Third one is either State or LSU but State is right down the road and has been played yearly forever. LSU has been a good recent “rivalry” in large partly due to Saban but that will probably diminish some after the Saban era.
Posted by Texas Gentleman
Texas
Member since Sep 2015
2827 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:18 am to
Would really like for A&M to have Arky as one of its permenant rivals as well. Easiest choice of the 3 you have listed for A&M is to swap out with Miss St, but not sure which of Arky's opponents you could swap. Arky, LSU, and Texas would be a nice slate of games for us.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9889 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

I believe they will move to 1 permanent riva


The SEC and a lot of the coaches were pretty candidly discussing the three permanent rival system at the most recent SEC Media Days. Pittman said he preferred Texas, Oklahoma, and Mizzou, for instance.
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9889 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Removing Miss State from Auburn. It should be Florida or even Tennessee over Miss St.


I was trying to prevent any team from having three Big Six rivals to keep things as balanced as possible. I'm sure most schools would generally prefer only Big Six opponents, and then it flat out doesn't work.
Posted by Maravich
Member since Mar 2014
2520 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:23 am to
A&M is far from our rival, they think we are tho
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27705 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:24 am to
Honestly not bad
Posted by ukraine_rebel
North Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3215 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:25 am to
State LSU then Vandy or Arkansas
Posted by SpurandBlue
Member since Jan 2023
410 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:25 am to
UT gets two historically bottom feeders and 1 top feeder.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
13397 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:26 am to
Arkansas vs LSU is missing
This post was edited on 2/10/23 at 9:28 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
88682 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I believe they will move to 1 permanent rival


the SEC has made some dumb decisions lately, but this would take the cake. There's no way they do htis. That means that one of the Iron Bowl or TSIO is going bye-bye, as well as one of the WLOCP and the DSOR.

Every single thing the powers that be ahve done lately is baout money. Nothing else, money. Period. So why would the league decide to play 8 conference games and lose these major rivalries, opposed to getting to play 9 conference games and keeping them?
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27705 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:29 am to
quote:

UT gets two historically bottom feeders and 1 top feeder.


This is the ordinary for UT, who has benefited from playing two programs with all-time losing records in November for about a century now.

162 of Tennessee's 410 conference wins, or 39%, come against Kentucky and Vandy.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27705 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Every single thing the powers that be ahve done lately is baout money. Nothing else, money. Period. So why would the league decide to play 8 conference games and lose these major rivalries, opposed to getting to play 9 conference games and keeping them?


I think you answered your own question. The league doesn't give a flying frick what the fans want. The want to maximize revenue and nothing more. Whatever ESPN says will go.

It's a crying shame too.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
38671 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 9:31 am to
quote:


the SEC has made some dumb decisions lately, but this would take the cake. There's no way they do htis. That means that one of the Iron Bowl or TSIO is going bye-bye, as well as one of the WLOCP and the DSOR.

Every single thing the powers that be ahve done lately is baout money. Nothing else, money. Period. So why would the league decide to play 8 conference games and lose these major rivalries, opposed to getting to play 9 conference games and keeping them?


Why should a 16 team conference with multiple power houses turn itself into a pretzel over 2 football games?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter