Started By
Message

Big10 commissioner says he sees them going to 20 teams
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:30 pm
And paying players
Per Brett McMurphy
More conference expansion may happen sooner than later
LINK
Per Brett McMurphy
quote:
Big Ten’s Kevin Warren tells @RealSportsHBO
he sees Big Ten having 20 members & paying players. “Those (paying players) are things we have to resolve. We have to. So I want to be part of this conversation & will be part of this conversation of what we can do to make this better”
More conference expansion may happen sooner than later
LINK
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:32 pm to thatguy45
Sankey really screwed the pooch on this one.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:35 pm to Houag80
quote:
Sankey really screwed the pooch on this one.
Just means we will go to 20 as well Im sure
Take your pick of what acc schools you want cause unless we grab Oklahoma State, I'm sure the 4 will be from there
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:36 pm to thatguy45
quote:
And paying players

Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:37 pm to Houag80
quote:
Sankey really screwed the pooch on this one.
Not necessarily. You can certainly grow the size of your pie by adding teams, but depending on what you add, you can also make each slice of pie smaller for each member.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 12:39 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Not necessarily. You can certainly grow the size of your pie by adding teams, but depending on what you add, you can also make each slice of pie smaller for each member.
Yep. Have to add the right schools or it's not worth it for the current members
It's why the big 10 grabbed usc/ucla
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:07 pm to thatguy45
quote:
Just means we will go to 20 as well Im sure
Take your pick of what acc schools you want cause unless we grab Oklahoma State, I'm sure the 4 will be from there
Outside of Clemson and Florida St, none of them have been to the playoffs. Grab 2 from the ACC and 2-3 from the new Big 12.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:15 pm to Houag80
quote:
Sankey really screwed the pooch on this one.
I am afraid you are correct.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:40 pm to Houag80
quote:
Sankey really screwed the pooch on this one.
How? I sincerely think the SEC is in a much better position over the long run than the B1G. Once the dust has settled, it's likely going to look something like this in terms of additions since 2010:
B1G: Nebraska, Rutgers, Maryland, USC, UCLA, Washington, Oregon, Stanford, and either Cal or Notre Dame.
SEC: Texas A&M, Missouri, Texas, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Virginia Tech, Florida State, and Clemson.
The B1G will have added a has-been blue blood (Nebraska), a blue blood in a market where nobody cares about college football (USC), a couple interesting programs in Washington and Oregon, and then some afterthought programs. It's also sacrificed any semblance of geographic identity, which will be unpleasant for non-revenue sports.
The SEC, by contrast, will have added five programs that attract big time viewership (Texas, OU, Clemson, FSU, and Aggy), largely maintained a geographic identity, and will be home to every single championship winner since 2004, save a single year (Ohio State - 2014). Additionally, the vast majority of the country's talent comes from SEC states. While states like Texas, Florida, and Georgia grow in population and football talent, the B1G states are largely floundering.
This post was edited on 8/19/22 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:42 pm to thatguy45
Yeah the BIG has teams spread over Eastern, Central and Pacific time zone. Fans and players be damned.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:45 pm to Houag80
I can’t stand Sankey but he’s playing this pretty well. Him wanting to keep the conference somewhat regional is big. The Big 10 adding USC sounds cool but it’s going to be a nightmare traveling for everyone
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:47 pm to Henry Jones Jr
The increased TV revenue will be eaten up by travel costs for the non-revenue sports.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:48 pm to thatguy45
quote:
Big10 commissioner says he sees them going to 20 teams
They can have them all as far as I’m concerned…
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:49 pm to thatguy45
Mizzou probably begging to be let in as we speak
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:56 pm to Slackaveli
Nah, we like it here. Plus, I enjoy how much Mizzou being in the conference seems to bother Arkansas fans.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 1:59 pm to Murph4HOF
quote:
The increased TV revenue will be eaten up by travel costs for the non-revenue sports.
If the SEC goes to 20 teams, the east/west sides will surely operate like their own leagues for the most part in minor sports. Or at least like divisions used to when the SEC was at 12. Cross division play will be limited in the regular season.
Texas
OU
TAMU
Mizzou
Arkansas
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss State
and either AU, UA or Vandy, UT in a "western conference".
Posted on 8/19/22 at 2:07 pm to BreakawayZou83
By waiting too long to act. If Warren is saying they will go to 20 he already has negotiated those and is ready to act.
Sankey may already be doing this, I could be wrong of course, but it appears to me that Sankey was caught flat footed with his dick in hand while Warren is banging the entire cheerleader squad.
Texas and OU don't show up until 2025....if they aren't part of Warren's balance of teams. Wouldn't that e a twist of fate. What a cluster, lol.
Sankey may already be doing this, I could be wrong of course, but it appears to me that Sankey was caught flat footed with his dick in hand while Warren is banging the entire cheerleader squad.
Texas and OU don't show up until 2025....if they aren't part of Warren's balance of teams. Wouldn't that e a twist of fate. What a cluster, lol.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 2:13 pm to thatguy45
Big 10 and SEC are just waiting for the moment they can pull the ACC apart.
Posted on 8/19/22 at 2:13 pm to Houag80
Do we throw a lifeline to someone in the Pac to expand the footprint? Probably not. I think we need to go after the ACC. Move up the east coast and bring in Miami, Clemson, North Carolina, & Virginia. It adds 2 more states and leaves only FSU, GT, Wake, Duke, & VT for the Big Ten to consider.
Back to top
