Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:17 pm to The Scofflaw
quote:
The B1G is about to box us in on the west coast and northern ACC schools + ND.
Jesus this isn’t a war. Y’all are getting ridiculous with the hysteria. B1G added an irrelevant school and a has been. They’ll regret introducing the liberal politics of the left coast to a conference dominated by Midwest culture.
I don’t want the SEC unique culture tarnished with non southern schools. If we expand it needs to be someone from Carolina, Florida, Virginia or Oklahoma state.
Hell I don’t even like adding liberal arse Austin, Tx to the conference. They’ll try to dictate their woke BS on us
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:19 pm to Luke
quote:
UVA, UNC, VATECH and Duke… it’s all we need to complete the southern footprint….
People forget Oklahoma State. They’d be solid and have a rivalry with OU.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:20 pm to The Scofflaw
I’m not sure why I should give a sht about numbers in a conference. All i care is if my team, Alabama, is in the playoffs
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:22 pm to The Scofflaw
quote:
The B1G is about to box us in on the west coast and northern ACC schools + ND
And???
The SEC will still win more than it loses against the B1G.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:44 pm to The Scofflaw
The SEC was fine at 12.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:50 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
I would rather become irrelevant and drop to DII than add a school outside the South
Posted on 7/4/22 at 2:52 pm to TexasTiger08
If by fine you mean not competitive in TV money, then 12 was fine.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 3:24 pm to The Scofflaw
Don’t know but the “baws” thing is really gay.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 3:29 pm to The Scofflaw
Yes, adding USC and UCLA makes the SEC quiver.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 3:36 pm to kywildcatfanone
The SEC is in great shape as is. No, they aren't quivering. The cause for concern is that the desirable schools not in the B1G or SEC would prefer to join the B1G over the SEC. And by desirable, I mean bring in enough pro rata valuation to consider expansion.
So whenever the B1G or SEC does expand, the B1G will get first pick.
So whenever the B1G or SEC does expand, the B1G will get first pick.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 3:52 pm to deltaland
No one wants Oklahoma state… they add nothing
Posted on 7/4/22 at 4:22 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
The SEC is in great shape as is. No, they aren't quivering. The cause for concern is that the desirable schools not in the B1G or SEC would prefer to join the B1G over the SEC. And by desirable, I mean bring in enough pro rata valuation to consider expansion.
Who left would add that in the top sport college football?
Nobody football relevant is going to go to the Big Ten, and very few that are basketball relevant would consider the Big Ten either.
The SEC and the ACC have an unwritten agreement to leave each others teams alone.
quote:
So whenever the B1G or SEC does expand, the B1G will get first pick.
The Big Ten has really jumped the shark with their new adds. A cross country conference for athletics, when their original members struggle to win, and then add two has been programs (in the big 3) in hopes that it will get better?
The Big Ten think that college sports are suddenly going to be a huge thing in the NE corridor and the LA basin with millions watching?
The SEC is laughing
Posted on 7/4/22 at 4:23 pm to The Scofflaw
quote:
The B1G is about to box us in on the west coast and northern ACC schools + ND.
And the SEC will still be the best conference.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:25 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
It is all about TV viewership. That is how Missouri got in.
If the SEC sits by and does nothing it will be like the Womens National Soccer team. Winning all the championships but not getting paid.
Add the states of North Carolina and Virginia.
If the SEC sits by and does nothing it will be like the Womens National Soccer team. Winning all the championships but not getting paid.
Add the states of North Carolina and Virginia.
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:29 pm to outlawjoseywales
8 of the top 10 highest rated markets for CFB are in SEC states.
1. Birmingham, AL (SEC)
2. Oklahoma City, OK (SEC)
3. Columbus, OH
4. Greenville, SC (SEC)
5. New Orleans, LA (SEC)
5. Atlanta, GA (SEC)
7. Jacksonville, FL (SEC)
7. Tulsa, OK (SEC)
9. Las Vegas, NV
10 Knoxville, TN (SEC)
11. Dayton, OH
12. Greensboro, NC
12. Austin, TX (SEC)
12. Charlotte, NC
12. Ft Myers, FL (SEC)
16. Pittsburgh, PA
16. Nashville, TN (SEC)
16. Norfolk, VA
16. Memphis, TN (SEC)
20. Cleveland, OH
21. Orlando, FL (SEC)
22. Raleigh-Durham, NC
22. West Palm Beach, FL (SEC)
22. Detroit, MI
25. Cincinnati, OH
1. Birmingham, AL (SEC)
2. Oklahoma City, OK (SEC)
3. Columbus, OH
4. Greenville, SC (SEC)
5. New Orleans, LA (SEC)
5. Atlanta, GA (SEC)
7. Jacksonville, FL (SEC)
7. Tulsa, OK (SEC)
9. Las Vegas, NV
10 Knoxville, TN (SEC)
11. Dayton, OH
12. Greensboro, NC
12. Austin, TX (SEC)
12. Charlotte, NC
12. Ft Myers, FL (SEC)
16. Pittsburgh, PA
16. Nashville, TN (SEC)
16. Norfolk, VA
16. Memphis, TN (SEC)
20. Cleveland, OH
21. Orlando, FL (SEC)
22. Raleigh-Durham, NC
22. West Palm Beach, FL (SEC)
22. Detroit, MI
25. Cincinnati, OH
This post was edited on 7/4/22 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:31 pm to The Scofflaw
quote:
The B1G is about to box us in
This ... doesn't mean anything
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:35 pm to outlawjoseywales
quote:
Winning all the championships but not getting paid.
What?
quote:
Add the states of North Carolina and Virginia.
And then what? Where and when will TV money come pouring to justify the move
BTW both St Louis and KC are shitty markets for CFB viewership.
Posted on 7/4/22 at 7:43 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
3 of the top 22 in NC. Interesting.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News