Started By
Message
Yes or no for expanded playoff?
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:12 pm
I vote no. Since the playoffs started, these semi games and even Natty games are mostly lopsided. Stay at four. What say you? Also, Happy New Years.
79
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:13 pm to bamaoldtimer
No, keep it the way it is
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:13 pm to bamaoldtimer
No
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:13 pm to bamaoldtimer
No, but they'll do it anyway. Should have kept the BCS.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:13 pm to bamaoldtimer
#3 or #4 team has been in 5/8 Final games. They wouldn’t have made a single one under the old system.
Give me an expansion.
If the #1 and #2 teams were winning every game, fine, but they aren’t.
Give me an expansion.
If the #1 and #2 teams were winning every game, fine, but they aren’t.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
No just pick best teams
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
The games in a 4 team playoff are already not even competitive.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
No
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
No
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
Stay at 4. Do we need to see more lopsided playoff games?
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:14 pm to bamaoldtimer
Yes. No matter the outcome.. It's not good for the sport if 80% of the teams wouldn't get a look even if they had a good season..
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:16 pm to bamaoldtimer
Yes. I want more teams to get a chance and see the big dogs go through more of a gauntlet, rather than play one team and you’re in the show. Alabama lost to TAMU this year, so slip ups happen. Expanding makes that more of a possibility.
This post was edited on 12/31/21 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:16 pm to Capo Losi
Well you’re not wrong if you ask why there is even a NIT for the 70+ Worst best teams in basketball lol
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:16 pm to bamaoldtimer
The 4 team playoffs allow 3-4 weeks to prepare for the semis. A 12-16 team playoff would start a week after the Conference CGs . Big difference.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:17 pm to bamaoldtimer
It should be hard to get into the playoff. Who would have wanted to see Notre Dame and Baylor in the playoffs this year? I wouldn’t.
This post was edited on 12/31/21 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:17 pm to bamaoldtimer
Yes. But only because I feel like the SEC gets fricked by playing in the conference they do and we’d easily have more than two in.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:19 pm to bamaoldtimer
YES
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:19 pm to Capo Losi
Upsets and parity is good for the sport. The same teams that win kill interest.
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:19 pm to bamaoldtimer
Eight teams are probably inevitable
Usually silly but whatever. Typically there are only two or three teams with any argument for being #1.
Cincinnati at least had an argument for being there. I think Michigan was weaker than admitted before today's results
Usually silly but whatever. Typically there are only two or three teams with any argument for being #1.
Cincinnati at least had an argument for being there. I think Michigan was weaker than admitted before today's results
Posted on 12/31/21 at 8:19 pm to FlexDawg
Oklahoma State yes but Notre Dame no.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News