Started By
Message

Why is Texas A&M ok with hiring Elko but not Stoops?
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:05 pm
Did they get Elko because of the familiarity with him on staff there under Jimbo but defensive mind Mark Stoops was not good enough for them being it’s the same hire? lol
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:05 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Stoops seems like the better option of those two but who knows? Maybe he’ll work out.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:05 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Because Stoops is a terrible coach
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:06 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Elko should be quite a bit cheaper
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:06 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Both are crappy unproven options
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:07 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Rumored deal for Stoops was 7 years $70 million which...
no thanks at being tied to yet another impossible to fire coach.

Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:07 pm to Byrdybyrd05
If you actually watched A&M under Elko you’d get it. Duke won ten games in three seasons combined before Elko came in
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:09 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Exactly. Didnt know how it was going to get there but you knew you'd get to the table expecting a rib eye and get served a flank stake
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:10 pm to Byrdybyrd05
quote:Because Stoops turned them down, so they moved on to number 2?
Why is Texas A&M ok with hiring Elko but not Stoops
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:11 pm to Byrdybyrd05
I watched Duke play twice this year. Not very talented, but they were a very physical team. That is what impressed me.
If he can bring that to TAMU, he will do well IMO.
If he can bring that to TAMU, he will do well IMO.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:11 pm to AUCE05
Anybody who can win at Kentucky is not terrible
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:12 pm to Johnnycrane
Kentucky is not a shite program.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:13 pm to Byrdybyrd05
quote:
Why is Texas A&M ok with hiring Elko but not Stoops
They fired Jimbo and will pay him 75 M for their offensive woes.
Only to hire 2 defensive coaches in the last 24 hours.
Show me any Aggy in College Station that knows what they're doing right now and I'll show you a bridge for sale.
None of this makes sense at this point.

Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:13 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Younger. Cheaper. Previous ties to A&M.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:13 pm to frogtown
quote:
I watched Duke play twice this year. Not very talented, but they were a very physical team. That is what impressed me.
They were also 4-0 and broke into the AP Top 25 before losing their QB to injury
This post was edited on 11/26/23 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:13 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Stoops is less successful than Jimbo. Elko represents a higher ceiling. He was a big time DC and quickly turned a terrible Duke in a winning program. “Did more with less”.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:13 pm to Byrdybyrd05
Elko has been at the top of the TexAgs wishlist for years. the inmates run the asylum
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:15 pm to Farmer1906
That’s literally Stoops resume. He was a bigger time championship coordinator and sustained a Duke level program in the SEC for a decade.
It’s hilarious that Faggies think they are above stoops but not Elko.
It’s hilarious that Faggies think they are above stoops but not Elko.
Posted on 11/26/23 at 4:16 pm to Errerrerrwere
It truly is crazy that they pay Jimbo that much to leave and have little to no plans on moving forward other than to say we won’t be paying the next coach that much. A 9th grade class could have put together a more stable business plan.
Popular
Back to top
