Started By
Message
Under Armour
Posted on 6/28/20 at 10:40 am
Posted on 6/28/20 at 10:40 am
They’ve pulled out of their deal with UCLA and now all Cal gear has been removed from their website.
Chances they end their deal with Auburn? I would presume we are their largest program
Chances they end their deal with Auburn? I would presume we are their largest program
Posted on 6/28/20 at 10:42 am to beaver
Isn’t Norte Dame with UA? They’re probably their largest account right now
What happened to the UCLA deal?
What happened to the UCLA deal?
Posted on 6/28/20 at 10:46 am to beaver
UCLA’s deal was nearly 300 million. For comparison, Auburn’s was less than 80. Notre Dame’s was around 90.
Auburn’s deal also included $10 million in shares that are worth about $2million now. I really doubt they’re itching to get out
Auburn’s deal also included $10 million in shares that are worth about $2million now. I really doubt they’re itching to get out
Posted on 6/28/20 at 10:54 am to TheJones
Why was theirs so much more than ours?
Posted on 6/28/20 at 12:49 pm to Leto II
I’m guessing the local Los Angeles market in comparison to Auburn and South Bend played a role in the difference
Posted on 6/28/20 at 3:13 pm to Leto II
quote:
Why was theirs so much more than ours?
5extra years and UA publicly stated that wanted more presence in LA/West Coast markets + came right after Nike secured a bunch of schools for record amounts
Posted on 6/28/20 at 3:27 pm to Leto II
quote:
Why was theirs so much more than ours?
Especially when Auburn put them on the map.
Posted on 6/28/20 at 3:47 pm to beaver
If they’re ceasing to pursue collegiate deals, we’ll move to Adidas.
Posted on 6/28/20 at 4:34 pm to Rig
why are we so against Nike? Would much rather nike than adidas
Posted on 6/28/20 at 4:54 pm to Rig
quote:
If they’re ceasing to pursue collegiate deals, we’ll move to Adidas.
Omg, I hope not. Adidas produces the cheapest looking, ugliest uniforms in sports.
I wouldn't mind the Jordan logo on Auburn's unis. That would be pretty cool, especially in bball.
Posted on 6/28/20 at 5:41 pm to auzach91
I’m not against Nike. I’m just saying what will make the most financial sense for the school. I don’t see Nike ponying up for AU
Posted on 6/28/20 at 7:19 pm to auzach91
quote:
why are we so against Nike?
2010...who funded the journalism efforts into Cam?
Posted on 6/28/20 at 7:22 pm to auzach91
Don’t think anyone has been anti-Nike
UA just pays more.
UA just pays more.
Posted on 6/28/20 at 9:03 pm to beaver
It had to do with marketing and lack of from UCLA.
Posted on 6/28/20 at 9:35 pm to AUCE05
If we do move, let’s go Jordan brand for BB.
Who wouldn’t love free Jordan’s
Who wouldn’t love free Jordan’s
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:05 am to Ccslimm
quote:
let’s go Jordan brand for BB
We would get all the croots
Posted on 6/29/20 at 8:03 am to auzach91
quote:
why are we so against Nike? Would much rather nike than adidas
Nike already has deals with Bama/UGA who operate in our markets. We don't offer Nike much value, the deal would reflect that
I'm happy with UA at this point.
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 8:04 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 8:09 am to GenesChin
quote:
I'm happy with UA at this point.
As am I. If we were to move on I would be happy with Adidas or Jordan though. Like you said, we don’t add enough for Nike so even if we signed with them it would likely be a really poor contract for us.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 8:25 am to auzach91
quote:Weren't there issues back in the early 2000s when football was wearing Nike cleats?
why are we so against Nike?
I seem to remember that Nike specified how the trainers could/couldn't do spat tape jobs because the Swoosh logo had to be visible.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 8:55 am to auzach91
quote:
why are we so against Nike?
I am not sure of the particulars, but Nike shite on us somehow. I remember Tubs covered up the swoosh with black tape.
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 8:56 am
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News