Started By
Message

NIL regs passed by Big 10 and SEC thoughts?

Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:51 am
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21735 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:51 am
The Big 10 passed a total limit of 49 million. 21.3 by school and the rest by boosters. Athletes could secure other deals on their own, but not solicited by the school, hmmm sounds tough to stop any money washing.

The SEC 21.3 cap with a 1% fine for a million over 3% for 3 million over, though not passed yet but something before early signing. This "luxury tax" is a pittance that wont control any spending.

Am I reading these wrong?
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
46191 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 7:53 am to
We gotta recognize one fact. These are grown men. You cannot stop them from making money as an adult. If they want to advertise at a boosters car dealership, it isnt illegal and you can't make a rule against it. We also need to regulate coaches salary and their buyouts.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
55435 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

We gotta recognize one fact. These are grown men. You cannot stop them from making money as an adult.

Nobody is trying to.

Auburn can meet NIL regulations and then if we have some player get an NIL deal with Subway then they should be allowed to make even more. When are yall going to start caring about grown people working long hours that can barely afford food just because libtard trump likes handing out checks. Stop being worried about spoiled pimple- headed little fricks
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 8:33 am
Posted by wareaglepete
Siberia
Member since Dec 2012
20487 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:50 am to
So, the schools can pay the players now?

And, that Big10 limit would fail in court.
This post was edited on 11/10/26 at 8:58 am
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21735 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 9:58 am to
Pete,

The 21.3 is the rev sharing number that has been agreed to already, and was in place this year.

Big Ten example:

School portion is 21.3
JP Morgan 17.0
Other boosters 10.7

If Jeremiah Smith then goes out on his own and gets a Dr. Pepper sponsorship thats fine.

SEC example:

School portion 21.3
Boosters 20 million (would cost the school 200K as a luxury tax).

I just dont see how this stops unlimited spending by schools with huge boosters.



Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
55435 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I just dont see how this stops unlimited spending by schools with huge boosters.

It wouldn't.
Posted by wareaglepete
Siberia
Member since Dec 2012
20487 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 10:35 am to
Cool. I didn’t realize they were letting the schools pay them direct now.

I guess as set up, the school and league are agreeing to the rule. So, the school tell them how much they can get from NIL, but the players would have to understand that if some took way big deals and put them over the limit it may cause their school to get fined.

What fun college sports is now!
Posted by pdfield34
Member since Aug 2022
827 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:07 am to
We already have examples of where "unlimited" spending does not work all of the time to to reduce competition. This alone will limit spending.

Desperate attempt by nonessentials to keep a piece of the pie.
Posted by TailbackU
ATL
Member since Oct 2005
13934 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 11:32 am to
‘Member when they wanted me to send $34 a month for NIL so 20 yr olds could make millions? I ‘member
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
25105 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

So, the school tell them how much they can get from NIL, but the players would have to understand that if some took way big deals and put them over the limit it may cause their school to get fined.

No, all the schools have a set amount they can pay out in revenue sharing. I believe it is right around $20MM. That is only what schools can dole out in any way they see fit to the athletes in every program. It doesn't have to be uniform per sport or per athlete.

Anything an athletes gets outside of that doesn't count toward the $20MM revenue share cap. So they can get $20k from the school and $2.5MM from corporate sponsors or collectives and it doesn't add to that $20k number.
Posted by NewYrkTiger
New York City
Member since Jul 2023
438 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 12:51 pm to
And also reopens the door to resume under the table payments. I’d rather not. Nobody can cheat if there’s no such thing as cheating. Otherwise, cheating for some but not for others (without repercussions).
Posted by wareaglepete
Siberia
Member since Dec 2012
20487 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Anything an athletes gets outside of that doesn't count toward the $20MM revenue share cap.


In the SEC. In the OP he mentioned the BIG10 having a total cap and that is what I was talking about.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
21319 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 1:59 pm to
NIL regulations or not, the bigger issue is the transfer portal.

I don’t care if Tim Smith Jr is getting $2 million to catch a ball.

I do care that he might decide to leave whenever he wants for $2.1 million at a rival school.

I do care that players have literally refused to get on busses without an NIL negotiation.

I do care that players aren’t developing in systems or becoming part of a university identity.

But nothing I care about matters. 24 team playoff with an endless rotation of talent among a few select schools. CFB sucks and one day (hopefully) I will get to the point that I don’t care to watch Auburn football anymore.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
25105 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

the bigger issue is the transfer portal.

This. The free agency after every season has done more harm than the money.
Posted by CorchJay
Member since Nov 2018
22675 posts
Posted on 11/10/26 at 8:28 pm to
NIL and rev sharing if provided by the university or booster much have contracts and very detailed ones now. Like entering the transfer portal. Have to have a snippet about you have to have some type of buyout. That’s the only way forward.

Before the schools had to much power over the athletes now the athletes have to much power over the schools. $50 million is a bit to much. I would have tried to work that number down to $30m with $21 million coming from rev share.

Also truth told above if a player solicits his own deal with an individual company that has zero association with a school, then I have no idea how they could regulate that.

And for us old school college athletes that starved half the time and put in as much or more work then the players do now I don’t feel sorry for these punks making millions a year.

Yes I was all over the original thought of NIL but I was under the impression it was gonna max out at the elite of the very elite players making like $50k a year. So funding entire athletic departments scholarship players may total $7 million for boys and girls sports.

Yall remember when Texas was offering $50k for the top lineman and was getting them
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•Twitter