Started By
Message

re: Malcolm Simmons Arrested (Case Dismissed/Chex vs Corch Cat Fight Continues)

Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:17 pm to
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69298 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

It’s because no matter what happens, even if he’s found innocent, people will still think what they want to and come to their own conclusions about what happened. There is always a stain on you. Surely you understand this?



Im sure nothing happened and he is totally innocent.

But its possible his "athletic status" is helping him out of it which would not happen for a normal person facing the same charges.

Surely you understand this?
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
13163 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Judge’s decision not good enough?




Time will tell.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39572 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

But its possible his "athletic status" is helping him out of it which would not happen for a normal person facing the same charges.


I'm not necessarily disagreeing (though i'm not sure what has happened up to this point that wouldn't happen to someone else that wasn't an athlete, in this specific case). However, playing devil's advocate real quick, the flip of this is also true. Nobody would be claiming some nefarious scheme is at play here if everything unfolded like it has and he wasn't an athlete.

Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
17324 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Surely you understand this?


WTH has that got to do with youthful offender status? That’s what we were discussing. And on that topic, anyone the right age can request, not just players.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69298 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

I'm not necessarily disagreeing (though i'm not sure what has happened up to this point that wouldn't happen to someone else that wasn't an athlete, in this specific case). However, playing devil's advocate real quick, the flip of this is also true. Nobody would be claiming some nefarious scheme is at play here if everything unfolded like it has and he wasn't an athlete.




My point being, it is just as realistic these days, that he was guilty and the powers behind him are helping him out than it is that he didnt du nuffin.

We can accept that this is just a money grab by a crazy bitch and we can believe that this guy is getting off , with help, because he can run fast and jump high.

None of us know all the info and if they do seal up all the evidence, we will never know so people are obviously going to make up their own minds.

Just for one second take off your love for the all mighty program and think of it as it were regular people. Or a player for another team.

Thats all Im saying.

Posted by CorchJay
Member since Nov 2018
20927 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 5:48 pm to
Every lawyer would attempt to get youthful offender status for their client. Regardless of them being an athlete or not. One of my boys got busted with a thc vape pen. He claimed youthful offender status solely so that his arrest would be sealed. Had nothing to do with guilt or innocence.

You understand this, right?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39572 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

think of it as it were regular people. Or a player for another team.


What I’ve done this entire thread, and why I said I don’t know what has happened so far that wouldn’t have happened if he wasn’t an athlete.

Just pointing out that saying “you need to try and view things if he wasn’t an athlete”, when the entire premise that something nefarious is going on here hinges on the fact that he is an athlete, falls flat. It frames every action without actually looking at it at its face.

This post was edited on 8/8/25 at 6:12 pm
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
13944 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

he was ruled not responsible. That's an interesting way of putting it

I'd be curious to know what the possibilities are in the Title IX office findings. I'm betting they can't use guilty/not guilty as those are legal terms adjudicated in court.

Are the only possible rulings responsible/not responsible? If so then Simmons could have done nothing and still have to be ruled "not responsible." But, if they have other possible rulings, then not responsible means he was involved in something but not to a point of where he violated any Title IX rules.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39572 posts
Posted on 8/8/25 at 6:04 pm to
No idea but it’s a good question.
Posted by marshallcotiger
Member since Dec 2009
8303 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:29 pm to
Jason Caldwell is saying he's heard the case has been dismissed and is looking to confirm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39572 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:19 pm to
Seeing a couple people repeating it as well.
Posted by CorchJay
Member since Nov 2018
20927 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:39 pm to
Only 58% of arrests for DV receive convictions in the state of Alabama. They are very complicated cases. That’s why I have taken zero stance on the Simmons issue.

If he is cleared by the University and the Courts then all good as a fan. Just hope whatever did happen if something happened that he doesn’t get himself put in a situation like that again.
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
17324 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 5:54 pm to
This post was edited on 8/11/25 at 5:56 pm
Posted by aubiecat
Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
5827 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 5:59 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Here you go JT33. You and 7 other "Auburn fans" wanted him gone from the team and paid back the NIL money before a resolution of his case.
University found no wrong doing and the charges were dropped. Cleared of all wrong doing. You and some others owe him an apology.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69298 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

Here you go JT33. You and 7 other "Auburn fans" wanted him gone from the team and paid back the NIL money before a resolution of his case.
University found no wrong doing and the charges were dropped. Cleared of all wrong doing. You and some others owe him an apology.









Posted by jt33
Member since Aug 2017
5159 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:23 pm to
I've already said my peace on the subject and I'm not getting into it again. Its pointless.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

University found no wrong doing and the charges were dropped. Cleared of all wrong doing
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69298 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:52 pm to
quote:


I've already said my peace on the subject and I'm not getting into it again. Its pointless.


You are arguing with people that are University, god, family, country.





Im absolutely sure, since the charges were dropped, that dude did absolutely nothing wrong. Hell, he may have not even been there.


Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
22872 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Cleared of all wrongdoing


I'm glad he has been cleared. I hope he plays well this season
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 8/11/25 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

ou are arguing with people that are University, god, family, country.
excuse you? the frick you mean by that bud
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter