Started By
Message

re: If we decline further it will be because we held onto Golding too long

Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:54 am to
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22668 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 10:54 am to
quote:


48 - 14 = 34, not 31.


Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the FG Auburn was given by terrible officials. A stop the defense actually got, which lead to a free 3 points to Auburn.

Also Goldings fault.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 10:55 am
Posted by nb200016
Atlanta, GA
Member since Mar 2014
1282 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:10 am to
Not this bullshite again
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Were those metrics impacted by how Bama's defense fared vs sisters of the poor like Duke, New Mexico St, Southern Miss, Arkansas, and Western Carolina?


All 130 CFB teams were put through the EXACT SAME metrics, and 124 other defenses were worse than us according to the SP, which is the best set of advanced metrics available.

If you want to see the SP formula that accounts for strength of opponent, garbage time, etc., look it up yourself. I ain't yo maid.

However, it's obvious that you WANT to believe a narrative that Golding is singlehandedly responsible for the downfall of humanity, so have at it. You're wrong - but you're going to believe it no matter what.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:32 am to
The correct answer to my question is a simple "Yes." Instead of acknowledging it and the fact that 8 teams held Auburn's meh offense to fewer points than Bama did, you spewed silly hyperbole as your method of evading those considerations and insisting how ridiculously wrong it is for me to WANT to believe that Golding hasn't done an adequate job as DC.

I think we should just agree that we disagree about Golding's job performance.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:02 pm
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14110 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:49 am to
quote:

All 130 CFB teams were put through the EXACT SAME metrics, and 124 other defenses were worse than us according to the SP, which is the best set of advanced metrics available.

If you want to see the SP formula that accounts for strength of opponent, garbage time, etc., look it up yourself. I ain't yo maid.



Advanced stats are fine when they're congruent with the eye test. In alabama's case though, they weren't.

Now i haven't read all your posts on golding but i have read enough to get the gist of your overall theme.

You're right. Golding by and large did fine with what he had to work with and there's just no flippin' way anyone can get a reasonable handle on how good he really is when he had a shitload of freshmen guys playing on defense, as well as guys that if not for these injuries would probably be in the transfer portal.

I mean shite, i've lost count of all the rotating true and redshirt freshmen and 3rd teamers playing on that defense this year.

It was a mess and honestly could have been alot worse than it was. Now in that regard you can quote some advanced stats for sure.

No matter. You're right on about your golding assessment and until he leaves, saban either agrees with you or no one better wants to coach here. We'll know more after the supplemental national signing day as i've taken to calling it.


This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 11:52 am
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:59 am to
My only real point with the advanced metrics was to show that the defense wasn't actually as bad as many Bama fans act like it was. That's all. I don't actually believe we were the 6th best defense in the country. But we were probably 20th or so, but many here act like we put chopped liver on the field, like Bowling Green level defense.
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 11:59 am to
Sure. Agree to disagree.
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

The correct answer to my question is a simple "Yes."


Every poster on this board can and will express themselves however they please, and it's silly to want other posters to post the way you would or the way you want them to. Whatever high horse you think you're on in your mind, please get off it. It ain't real.
Posted by RollTideNL
Member since Jan 2019
334 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:13 pm to
I don't know whether Golding is a BAD defensive coordinator. But after one year as DC and another year as co-DC and (part time) playcaller, we also have no clue whether:
- he is a GOOD defensive coordinator by BAMA standards;
- has the kind of demeanor/attitude that is needed and expected to coach an Alabama style defense;
- he is a good fit at Bama;
- can teach fundamentals to ILBs.

What we do know is that is Alabama: there is not more time to wait and see if Golding is a GOOD DC. We have been sub-par (by Saban-Bama standards) for 2 years now. 3 years could mean a disaster (esp. with a rough schedule and a less potent offense).

So, not all blame should fall on PG, but that doesn't mean there is time to wait another year to see whether he is good enough.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:14 pm
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Every poster on this board can and will express themselves however they please, and it's silly to want other posters to post the way you would or the way you want them to. Whatever high horse you think you're on in your mind, please get off it. It ain't real.

Ironic post is ironic.

Every poster on this board can and will express themselves however they please, and you're silly to want other posters to post the way you would or the way you want them to. Whatever high horse you're on in your mind, please get off it. It ain't real.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:29 pm
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52687 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The correct answer to my question is a simple "Yes." Instead of acknowledging it and the fact that 8 teams held Auburn's meh offense to fewer points than Bama did,



I mean, yeah, but did their fg kicker go 4/4 on 40+ yard FGs against those teams???
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

I mean, yeah, but did their fg kicker go 4/4 on 40+ yard FGs against those teams???

Maybe those other teams prevented Auburn from getting the opportunities to do that.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:20 pm
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14110 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

My only real point with the advanced metrics was to show that the defense wasn't actually as bad as many Bama fans act like it was. That's all. I don't actually believe we were the 6th best defense in the country. But we were probably 20th or so, but many here act like we put chopped liver on the field, like Bowling Green level defense.



You're pretty much right.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22529 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

I mean, yeah, but did their fg kicker go 4/4 on 40+ yard FGs against those teams???

I don’t know what the ranges were but he was...
2/3 vs Oregon
2/2 vs UF
2/2 vs LSU
0/1vs UGA
1/1 vs Minnesota

Against those teams he didn’t even get into as many 40+ yard opportunities.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:29 pm
Posted by IB4bama
Pelham
Member since Oct 2017
1977 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:24 pm to
I think the barn kicker was about 2 of his last 8 kicks before our game.
Posted by IB4bama
Pelham
Member since Oct 2017
1977 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:24 pm to
I think the barn kicker was about 2 of his last 8 kicks before our game.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22529 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:26 pm to
See above. He was 7/9 against those ranked teams. Almost all his misses came in one game against Ole Miss.

Also that doesn’t negate his point. AU couldn’t get him into as many 40+ yard attempts versus those teams.
This post was edited on 1/10/20 at 12:31 pm
Posted by prevatt33b
Member since Oct 2019
1147 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:49 pm to
Surge, you are allowed to make original posts. I don't know if you are aware of that. You seem transfixed on me and copy-pasting my words over again, and have done it multiple times in this one thread.

I'm flattered, but you don't have to use my thoughts as your thoughts all the time. You are welcome to begin thinking for yourself.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22529 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:54 pm to
I agree with him. You, with your post history, telling someone to get off their high horse is ironic.
Posted by Bham Bammer
Member since Nov 2014
14481 posts
Posted on 1/10/20 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

No way Pete will be the DC for Bama in 2020.

I thought this would be the case a month back, but as I've thought about it more, I think he's going to be retained. Saban is trying to break the cycle of having to hire new coordinators every year. You can't do that if you keep firing them. I think Golding was not good this year, but I'll definitely concede that he was dealt a bad hand. This was the probably worst collection of defensive talent we've had in 10 years and we had tons of injuries. That doesn't make him without blame, but I think Saban is going to give him another year. He obviously sees something in the guy, who is kind of having to learn on the job.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter