Started By
Message

re: OT - I hope y'all are ready for President Clinton *gag*

Posted on 10/21/16 at 6:18 am to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Yeah, should make a fricking amendment that no person with a mental issue like being bipolar or a certified psychopath should be able to walk into a gun shop and get one. I'm sorry if that hurts your red white and blue balls to hear that, but we're not star spangled awesome enough to just let anybody that hears voices in their heads to get guns this easily.


If this is all you are for, then I doubt there would be a whole lot of opposition, However, if I am reading this right, then you are good with existing laws, right? You don't want any more restrictions, because these are already in place, aren't they?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24575 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 7:30 am to
I'm not sure the exact existing laws, if they're already in place then I'm fine with it. Not trying to start a movement, just wanna be rational about it.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I'm not sure the exact existing laws, if they're already in place then I'm fine with it. Not trying to start a movement, just wanna be rational about it.




Whoa! let's not start getting rational, now. This is politics we are talking about!

Most people are vehemently against Hillery because she intends to institute a 25% tax on gun sales, and also
restrict everybody's abilities to own a gun. Many do not understand why the federal government needs a document showing gun ownership. (Registration of firearms) unless the intent is to be able to +track guns for the purposes of confiscation. I realize the narrative is so that if a crime is committed, they can more easily track a particular weapon to an individual to identify the criminal. The problem is, if somebody
is going to commit a crime, they are not going to use a registered weapon, They will steal one or buy one on the black market, etc.

ETA

I found it! I thought there was legislation already on the books.

Federal Law

Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(d), it is unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person “has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution

LINK
This post was edited on 10/21/16 at 8:55 am
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:05 am to
If you don't get your information from the news media, where do you get it?

Your imagination?
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42479 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I could give a shite about your feelings. I'm a Marine and your feelings are no concern of mine. Start by doing some research. For yourself! Do I really have to explain that politicians say what needs to be said to get elected? Trump is a first time candidate so he is bound to say stupid shite and if that needs to be explained maybe you should vote for Hillary.


I've already thanked you for your service, and I know there's no way I could ever repay you for the sacrifices that you and/or your family have made and the tough times you've potentially gone through. At the same time, I don't believe serving in the military is an excuse to act like an arse.

I get that politicians say what need to be elected, but Trump being a first time candidate doesn't excuse what he says. He will also be a first time President. Guess what, you can't get away with stupid stuff there just because you haven't done it before.

quote:

Do you believe those in the media are unbiased? If so ask yourself why what Trump said on those recording were the biggest topic for just over a week while none of the wikkileak stuff got any real air time? Just yesterday a video came out with information on the Democratic partying engaging in criminal crap at Trump rallies. Donna Brazile has been caught red handed giving Hillary a verbatim question in the first debate but you hardly heard any of that.


No, I believe most of the media is clearly biased towards Hillary. I've had these feelings on Trump for quite a while. I align more politically with him, but there's more to being a president than just that IMO. I believe Wikileaks doesn't get a lot of air time because it is a foreign country hacking into someone's servers illegally. I'm sure people will say I'm a cuck because of this, but I have a very similar stance to Marco Rubio on Wikileaks.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86441 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:

smaller hand gun under my seat in my car.


hasn't that thing been broken into like 8 times? Nobodys taken the gun yet? That's pretty nice.
Posted by DragginFly
Under the Mountain;By the Lake
Member since Oct 2014
3593 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I believe Wikileaks doesn't get a lot of air time because it is a foreign country hacking into someone's servers illegally.


Wikileaks is not a country.

quote:

I'm sure people will say I'm a cuck because of this, but I have a very similar stance to Marco Rubio on Wikileaks.


You're both cucks.
Posted by wizatlanta
Cumming, GA
Member since Jan 2014
335 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 1:54 pm to
Unless you live on the #1 green at a better club than mine I doubt your East Cobb, 1960's split level is better than mine.
By the way, you sorta ignored the supreme court. Don't have much of a rebuttal for that do you E. Cobb?
Posted by MacDawg
Austin, TX
Member since Nov 2015
362 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

There simply is not a good choice this election.


If you believe this to be true, ask yourself these questions:

Which candidate will have his/her feet to the fire with every word / action / decision analyzed and scrutinized from day 1 of their Term?

Which candidate will not be allowed to overstep his/her constitutional authority by even the smallest degree?

Which candidate has already been absolved of a crime that would put you or I in prison?

Which candidate has the media decided to cover for, purposely ignoring numerous illegal and unethical behaviors and now we have learned have even conspired with?

If you truly believe in the word of law and the powers as written in the constitution there is really only 1 choice in the election. The choice of someone with huge flaws but that someone who will not be able to do much of anything in Washington due to the opposition from the establishment on both sides of the isle and the media. As opposed to someone who has already decided the laws don't apply to him/her and has already gotten away with, further emboldening his/her "above the law" position.
Posted by Cobb Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
9804 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Unless you live on the #1 green at a better club than mine I doubt your East Cobb, 1960's split level is better than mine.
By the way, you sorta ignored the supreme court. Don't have much of a rebuttal for that do you E. Cobb?


Don't live in E. Cobb. Have 6 br home in a gated community. I don't remember what you said about the Supreme Court. But I believe that a woman has a right to choose. I don't think abortion should be used as birth control, but it is what it is and it ain't going away. Neither is the 2nd amendment, and I do own guns, always have. Hillary's not going to open the borders any more than Bush Jr. did. And Trump wouldn't build a wall, even on the slim change he did get elected. He also won't do any other of the shite he's said he would do. Can't, everybody but yahoos hates him, even his own party members, whoever they are at the time he chooses a party.

I'm not thrilled that Hillary Clinton is our next POTUS. But she is far, far less dangerous than Trump. That dude's psycho.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58902 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Which candidate will have his/her feet to the fire with every word / action / decision analyzed and scrutinized from day 1 of their Term?


The opposite party holds each other to the fire. they scrutinize and blow out of proportion every word spoken from the opposite party.
quote:

Which candidate will not be allowed to overstep his/her constitutional authority by even the smallest degree?

Whether we like it or not(I don't) the Supreme Court decides what is Constitutional and what is not.
quote:

Which candidate has already been absolved of a crime that would put you or I in prison?

Hillery, of course. However, I also believe that Trump has fondled and molested women and should have been in jail.
quote:

Which candidate has the media decided to cover for, purposely ignoring numerous illegal and unethical behaviors and now we have learned have even conspired with?

That one is easy. Hillery.

Make no mistake about it, though. Donald Trump truly believes he is above the law just like Hillery and Bill. Just listen to his own words when speaking about someone with money and power can do anything they want to women. When he said he could grab women, he didn't mean grab them by the shoulders.

As I said...we are screwed no matter who is elected. I believe this more earnestly than just about anything else.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

But she is far, far less dangerous than Trump. That dude's psycho.

That's just so ridiculously ignorant.

Yeah the one in the pocket of the military industrial complex that is killing any chance of a relationship with Russia, who also armed rebels to overthrow Libya who turned into Al Quada, who armed rebels to overthrow Syria who turned into ISIS, who has done business with the Muslim Brotherhood, who wants to allow in Muslim refugees she admits we can't properly vet, and is gung-ho about Iran becoming a nuclear power....

That's the person you say is less dangerous than the guy who wants the opposite of all that.

Just damn.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13163 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

quote:But she is far, far less dangerous than Trump. That dude's psycho. That's just so ridiculously ignorant. Yeah the one in the pocket of the military industrial complex that is killing any chance of a relationship with Russia, who also armed rebels to overthrow Libya who turned into Al Quada, who armed rebels to overthrow Syria who turned into ISIS, who has done business with the Muslim Brotherhood, who wants to allow in Muslim refugees she admits we can't properly vet, and is gung-ho about Iran becoming a nuclear power.... That's the person you say is less dangerous than the guy who wants the opposite of all that. Just damn.


You nailed it. Thank you.
Posted by Cobb Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
9804 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

That's just so ridiculously ignorant.

Yeah the one in the pocket of the military industrial complex that is killing any chance of a relationship with Russia, who also armed rebels to overthrow Libya who turned into Al Quada, who armed rebels to overthrow Syria who turned into ISIS, who has done business with the Muslim Brotherhood, who wants to allow in Muslim refugees she admits we can't properly vet, and is gung-ho about Iran becoming a nuclear power....

That's the person you say is less dangerous than the guy who wants the opposite of all that.

Just damn.


So you want to sit around and sing kumbaya with the Russians now? They don't feel the same way. They are spying on every US/Western influence on the globe and trying to undermine our economy and our election process. Did you feel the same way when Reagan was hawkish towards the Russians? We will never be able trust those bastards. Read some of Patton's writings.

ISIS began when GWB invaded Iraq and destabilized the Middle East. I thought everybody who could read with comprehension knew that: LINK

Get your facts straight before you spout.
This post was edited on 10/21/16 at 7:40 pm
Posted by RedFive
Ringgold Ga
Member since Apr 2015
2168 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

So you want to sit around and sing kumbaya with the Russians now? They don't feel the same way. They are spying on every US/Western influence on the globe and trying to undermine our economy and our election process. Did you feel the same way when Reagan was hawkish towards the Russians? We will never be able trust those bastards. Read some of Patton's writings. ISIS began when GWB invaded Iraq and destabilized the Middle East. I thought everybody who could read with comprehension knew that: LINK Get your facts straight before you spout.


Isis did indeed begin with the start of the Congressionally approved War in Iraq but gained prominence while Barack Obama was in charge of the war/withdrawal. Foreign policy failures from the last 7 plus years jump started the problems we face in the Middle East currently. Rather you like him or not Donald Trump is 100% correct when he says foreign leaders have played Obama and Clinton like a fiddle. Poor ole Qaddafi, if he would have just donated to the Clinton Foundation he would still have his country.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 8:13 pm to
quote:


ISIS began when GWB invaded Iraq and destabilized the Middle East. I thought everybody who could read with comprehension knew that: LINK

More ignorance. And buying into blame Bush BS on top of that.

I hated Bush. If I could blame him for ISIS I promise you I would. But the attempted ousting of Assad started with Hillary well after Bush was out of office. We were still occupying Iraq well after Bush left office. And just like she armed "rebels" to oust Gadhafi in Libya she armed the "rebels" in Syria against Assad.

Then as soon as we left the vacuum in Iraq and Assad began getting help from Russia and kicking the crap out of the rebels, they migrated to Iraq and took over the oil reserves which made them rich as hell. And this is why ISIS is so wealthy. And they did it all with the weapons Hillary supplied them.

This is no brainer shite, man. The lefty MSM wants sheep like you to believe it was Bush for obvious reasons. And I can't believe after all the proof is out that the MSM are pure shills for Hillary and the Democrats that you actually trust anything they say that attempts to pass blame off of Hillary. Just pathetic.
This post was edited on 10/21/16 at 8:15 pm
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14162 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Did you feel the same way when Reagan was hawkish towards the Russians? We will never be able trust those bastards. Read some of Patton's writings.


The Russians and Putin are protecting their their interests. We along with NATO are putting weapons in neighboring countries and interfering with the politics of countries on their borders. We don't have to trust them....but we don't need to be outwardly fricking with them either.

Why do we even care about Syria? Assad is a bad guy but there are a lot of bad dudes in the world and I'd rather have him running Syria than Isis. Same thing that happened in Libya will happen there too ....except we'll also be picking a fight with Russia as well.

Bush fricked things up and this has been exaggerated by Obama. For some reason Hillary and the neocons can't wait to stir shite up with Russia and there's no benefit to us whatsoever in what happens in Syria or the Ukraine.

Spending our lives and money in these shitholes all over the world needs to stop. This shits so screwed up We''re fighting proxy wars with ourselves.

This post was edited on 10/21/16 at 8:47 pm
Posted by Cobb Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
9804 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:39 pm to
So you like Putin and Assad. That pretty much says it all.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14162 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:48 pm to
I don't care about either one of them.

Would you be happy if one of your kids was sent to fight in Syria along side Muslim extremist rebels to overthrow Assad? The same rebels that would just as soon kill him as look at hi. How is that defending the US or the Constitution?

Or would you gladly wave them off because some dumb arse politician told you it was the right thing to do? That your bringing freedom to the Middle East.

Get your head out of your arse.
Posted by FaCubeItches
Soviet Monica, People's Republic CA
Member since Sep 2012
5875 posts
Posted on 10/21/16 at 9:54 pm to
Yeah, frick the supreme law of the land, the benevolent government will *never* abuse power stupidly granted to it. Or maybe you missed the part of history where communist governments routinely declared people insane for no real reason.

And yes, we can give every psychopath or lunatic out there every possible weapon they can use. One, most aren't violent and wouldn't be a problem. Two, the ones that are wouldn't have very long careers in a society that hasn't been disarmed. If you allow people to protect themselves, they tend to do a pretty good job of it.


I'm sorry your pussy hurts. These may help.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter