Started By
Message
Javon Bullard not targeting
Posted on 1/2/23 at 6:21 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 6:21 am
Posted on 1/2/23 at 6:39 am to Rex Feral
Beautiful, did you see number four from shite st point to see head wanting a target call. That hit was how it’s supposed to be done again a beautiful hit
Posted on 1/2/23 at 8:45 am to Rex Feral
That’s one of those hits that’ll be on season and decade highlight reels for the whole country
Posted on 1/2/23 at 1:17 pm to Rex Feral
Awesome hit and likely saved the game. This might not be popular but that was a heck of a throw by stroud from 30-40 out off his back foot. I thought it was going into the seats but it was actually catchable. Dropped that one in a soda can
Posted on 1/2/23 at 1:34 pm to Dawg7730
I felt he was trying to throw it away and it came up short
Posted on 1/4/23 at 10:54 am to Spaceman Spiff
Stroud should have been called for creating a defenseless receiver
Posted on 1/4/23 at 11:07 am to Rex Feral
The Ohio Staters complaining about that non-call confirms what I have thought about them. Replay, slowed down, shows it was a shoulder to shoulder hit.
The problem is that fanbase is not used to seeing hits like that. The fanbase was shocked by it, so it had to be a penalty in their small minds.
The problem is that fanbase is not used to seeing hits like that. The fanbase was shocked by it, so it had to be a penalty in their small minds.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 11:11 am to Croot
quote:
Stroud should have been called for creating a defenseless receiver
Looked like he was playing Jackpot out there.
That was such a hospital pass that it almost got sponsored by Aflac during the eternity it took to re-enter the Benz' atmosphere.
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 11:12 am
Posted on 1/4/23 at 11:57 am to Rex Feral
Knocked a snot bubble in him . Straight up good football hit
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 1/4/23 at 12:28 pm to Dawg7730
quote:
Awesome hit and likely saved the game.
Receiver was out of bounds.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 12:48 pm to meansonny
Thing is, ref threw his hat for him stepping out of bounds and then coming back and trying to catch it. That was illegal touching which I assume we declined?
Posted on 1/4/23 at 12:48 pm to bunkerhill
quote:
The Ohio Staters complaining about that non-call confirms what I have thought about them. Replay, slowed down, shows it was a shoulder to shoulder hit.
Yep. Bullard's helmet never touched Harrison.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 1:56 pm to Peter Buck
It's only a penalty if he catches the ball.
Flag wasn't thrown. Play happened right in front of me; we saw the hat come off, but definitely no flag. Since Harrison didn't catch it, it's a moot point.
Flag wasn't thrown. Play happened right in front of me; we saw the hat come off, but definitely no flag. Since Harrison didn't catch it, it's a moot point.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 2:18 pm to Rex Feral
Violent hit, yes. Targeting, no. Buckeye fans whine more than Aubies……well, as much.
Game played at UGA’s “home”
Bowers was short
Targeting
Kirby’s timeout
They even started out saying we spied on their practice.
OSU played the best game they’ve played in years and they lost, yet again, to a SEC school. They’re just going to have to come to terms with it.
Game played at UGA’s “home”
Bowers was short
Targeting
Kirby’s timeout
They even started out saying we spied on their practice.
OSU played the best game they’ve played in years and they lost, yet again, to a SEC school. They’re just going to have to come to terms with it.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 2:50 pm to Peter Buck
Irrelevant. Rule says he has to catch it.
Posted on 1/4/23 at 3:09 pm to Floyd Dawg
It is called illegal touching, not illegal catching.
Illegal Touching by an originally ineligible player is penalized five yards from the previous spot and now includes loss of down.
Illegal Touching by an originally ineligible player is penalized five yards from the previous spot and now includes loss of down.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top


9







