Started By
Message
re: If we beat UK..
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:42 am to wdhalgren
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:42 am to wdhalgren
quote:
Maybe they will, but two years in a row of seeing them go without winning the conference would be irritating to me, and I'm a big SEC fan
They want the 4 best teams....Alabama is one of the 4 best teams, even if we beat them in the SECCG (or if they lose a very close game on the road in the toughest stadium to play in at night to who would then be the #1 team). You also can’t deny Alabama right now, I think they’ve proven themselves in the playoffs...lol
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 11:43 am
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:45 am to IT_Dawg
Not true...
If we win the SECG against LSU and Michigan beats OSU away and wins their Champ game, they will be the 4 spot.
Clemson >> undefeated
ND >> undefeated
UGA >> 1 loss and champion
UM >> 1 loss and champion
BAMA would not be a top 4 team if that occurs.
If we win the SECG against LSU and Michigan beats OSU away and wins their Champ game, they will be the 4 spot.
Clemson >> undefeated
ND >> undefeated
UGA >> 1 loss and champion
UM >> 1 loss and champion
BAMA would not be a top 4 team if that occurs.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 11:47 am
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:46 am to WG_Dawg
No doubt. I am just preparing myself to try to be optimistic if that matchup happens...and we all know it will
Posted on 11/2/18 at 11:59 am to Dawg4Life47
quote:
I want Bama because I want to beat the best.
quote:
Dawg4Life47
You're a solid poster and I agree with you a lot but this definitely isn't one of those times. I truly can't wrap my head around how anyone with UGA's best interest at heart can have this mindset. Or anybody for any team for that matter.
They dont' have different levels of championships or wins. A win is a win. A title is a title. Period. There aren't varying tiers with asterisks that denote some titles as being higher than other titles. Either you have one or you don't. It is in UGA's best interst, both to win the SEC and to make the playoffs, to face LSU and not alabmaa. Why ON EARTH would you want to make that feat harder instead of easier? If I had my way we'd play about 6 or 7 ULM's during the season, antoher in the SECCG, and 2 more in the playoffs.
Let me ask, how did you feel when we won the SEC in 2002? Pumped right? Were you bummed out and disappointed that we shellacked an average arkansas team instead of playing alabama who we should've played? That was a damn solid 10 win team we barely escaped in the regular season that would ahve won the west and gone to atlanta if they weren't on probation. But guess what, there aren't any asterisks next to that year on our trophy or our hearts, it simply says we're champions. In 1980 we didn't play a team in the entire regular season taht would finish in the top 20, does that diminish our title win any?
This isn't pro wrestling, you don't have to "beat the best to be the best". If LSU wins Saturday and the rest of the teams at the top hold serve like they SHOULD, we have a fantastic chance at making the playoffs and not having to play bama, which is as good a scenario as you can possibly hope for. To hope our path to that becomes harder is just absurd.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:08 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
they’ve proven themselves in the playoffs
Don't care what they've proven in the past. I don't like one team getting the benefit of the doubt repeatedly without winning their conference. It may happen and you may think it's fine, but I don't. It's almost like people are starting to think Bama has an annual mulligan game and don't even need to win their division or conference. If they're as great as advertised, then prove it by winning the conference. If they don't win the west, or if they lose in the SECCG, give some other team a chance to change the pre-conceived notions of who's playing the best football.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:08 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
They dont' have different levels of championships or wins. A win is a win. A title is a title. Period. There aren't varying tiers with asterisks that denote some titles as being higher than other titles. Either you have one or you don't. It is in UGA's best interst, both to win the SEC and to make the playoffs, to face LSU and not alabmaa. Why ON EARTH would you want to make that feat harder instead of easier? If I had my way we'd play about 6 or 7 ULM's during the season, antoher in the SECCG, and 2 more in the playoffs.
Freaking preach brother.
People are complaining about Bama’s schedule, and I bet they could not care less.
A trophy is a trophy. If you win your two playoff games it doesn’t matter how you got there.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:49 pm to WG_Dawg
To be honest, I just have a different mentality about it.
I hate the easy path in sports and I feel if we are that good, we will show it.
If I were to put that thought aside and say, how do we get the easiest path to the natty and win, then I would choose your way.
I hate the easy path in sports and I feel if we are that good, we will show it.
If I were to put that thought aside and say, how do we get the easiest path to the natty and win, then I would choose your way.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:51 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
If Bama doesn't win the SEC, I hope they don't make the playoffs over a 1 loss P5 conference champ
they won't.
SEC champ (us or LSU, since you state above it's not bama)
ACC champ (undefeated clemson)
Big 10 champ (1 loss UM or OSU likely)
Big 12 champ (likely 1 loss whoever it is)
Potentially undefeated ND
Potentially 1 loss Pac12 champ
People are so hung up on last season while somehow not realizing that the only team bama was competing against for the final spot had 2 losses, 1 of which was horrific.
Granted, if bama doesn't win the SEC or even their division, they COULD very well still make the playoffs but it would take some conference champs having 2 losses and ND having a loss. If all those guys leading their conferences right now (plus ND) hold serve and do as they should there is zero chance bama makes it in no matter how good they look.
1 loss SEC champ is for sure in.
Clemson looks destined to go 12-0 and romp in the ACC, they're a guarantee.
If ND wins out, which is probably more likely than not right now, they are a guarantee.
That's a lot of teams fighting it out for 1 more spot, and bama not winning their conference is absolutley going to hold them back.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:12 pm to WG_Dawg
Yep, BAMA doesn't get in if they don't win the SECG and ND and UM don't lose another game.
Still assuming Clemson doesn't lose either of course.
Still assuming Clemson doesn't lose either of course.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:17 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
I hate the easy path in sports and I feel if we are that good, we will show it.
we haven't won a title in going on 40 years and never in my lifetime, I'm not sure why it would make you feel worse abotu one if we didn't play the top 3 teams in a row to end the year.
If you're on bama's plane right now where they are basiclaly getting bored by beating everyone they play by 40 and only expect to be challenged in the second half maybe once or twice a year...ok sure. Bring on the big boys. But we aren't even close to that.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:27 pm to WG_Dawg
Like I said, its just a mentality and if that means we don't win the Natty, then fine.
I think we will soon though...
Our team has leadership issues, young as hell and they could be putting the team back in the SECG.
That means next year, we should be on Bama's level IMO.
I think we will soon though...
Our team has leadership issues, young as hell and they could be putting the team back in the SECG.
That means next year, we should be on Bama's level IMO.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 1:47 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
just a mentality and if that means we don't win the Natty, then fine.
How can you say this though? What you are saying is that you place a higher emphasis and MORE value on playing a touch schedule rather than actually winning a title. You have just claimed that your priorities in the season are
1)Play a tough schedule against the best teams
2)Win hardware
There's no way to spin that, it's what you said. How can this actually be your thought process? In a perfect video game scenario then sure, it would make winning a title even MORE enjoyable. I mean if we played the #16-#2 ranked teams in consecutive order to win the title there wouldn't possibly be anything sweeter. But that's not reality. We've won 2 (or 5, technically) titles in 125 seasons of football. Winning a title should be first and foremost and any and everythign else should come behidn it.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:28 pm to SCDawg3
Bama.
If LSU beats Bama and we beat LSU in the SECCG, there is a good possibility we don't make it to the final four because Bama could still be ranked above us.
However, if Bama beats LSU and we win the rest of our SEC games and beat Bama in the SECCG then we will definitely be in the final four.
If LSU beats Bama and we beat LSU in the SECCG, there is a good possibility we don't make it to the final four because Bama could still be ranked above us.
However, if Bama beats LSU and we win the rest of our SEC games and beat Bama in the SECCG then we will definitely be in the final four.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:31 pm to DawgfaninCa
1 loss SEC Champion is in the playoff 100% guaranteed. No questions asked.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 2:54 pm to Barstools
quote:
1 loss SEC Champion is in the playoff 100% guaranteed. No questions asked.
Normally I would agree with you but what if LSU beats Bama, we beat LSU in the SECCG, Clemson and Notre Dame are undefeated and two teams out of Ohio State, Oklahoma or Michigan also end the season with one loss?
Then an undefeated Clemson and Notre Dame, Bama with one loss and two other one loss teams like Michigan, Oklahoma or Ohio State could get into the final four ahead of us.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 3:18 pm to DawgfaninCa
Bama wouldn't get in the playoffs under that scenario. It's pretty simple, you're overthinking it. The SEC Champ with 1 loss is in no matter what.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 3:29 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Like I said, its just a mentality and if that means we don't win the Natty, then fine.
Posted on 11/2/18 at 5:18 pm to Barstools
quote:
Bama wouldn't get in the playoffs under that scenario. It's pretty simple, you're overthinking it. The SEC Champ with 1 loss is in no matter what.
I hope you're right but since Bama is the reigning National Champion and has been so dominate this year, I could see them getting into the playoff even with one loss against LSU and no SEC Championship.
In any event, this weekend's big SEC games are sure going to be fun to watch.
This post was edited on 11/2/18 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 11/2/18 at 5:33 pm to DawgfaninCa
You really just suggested that bama would get in over us with the following being the case:
UGA 12-1, sec champions, only loss to LSU (with a win over them as well)
Bama 11-1, didn't win their division, also a loss to LSU
You've lost your fricking mind if you think they would go over us in that scenario
UGA 12-1, sec champions, only loss to LSU (with a win over them as well)
Bama 11-1, didn't win their division, also a loss to LSU
You've lost your fricking mind if you think they would go over us in that scenario
Posted on 11/2/18 at 6:26 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I could see them getting into the playoff even with one loss against LSU and no SEC Championship.
Lay off the weed. There's just no way.
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News