DawgfaninCa

The Grumpycrats keep talking about how nothing has been done to help black people since the 60s to make up for past discrimination against them but they conveniently fail to mention that Affirmative Action was specifically implemented to make up for past discrimination against black people.

Apparently, they don’t want to mention that.

And we are still sanctioning NK.

The Grumpycrats are even more grumpy and that makes me even more happy.

Who gives a shite what Carter thinks?

Not me.

You can’t cash a losing ticket at the winner’s window.

Read my post just above yours. That’s why.

White women also benefiting from AA does not negate the fact that White men were discriminated against in order to discriminate in favor of Black men and women to make up for their mistreatment by the White race. If some of the Black race chose not to take advantage of AA, that’s not the White race’s fault.

The real question is will the Grumpycrats ever win another national election after the way they reacted because Trump won the presidency?

This is my new name for dumocrats.

quote:

---

Meh, Non white people never want to discuss the mistreatment of American Indians by other American Indians. BTW, calling them American Indians doesn't mean they are from India. If they can be called "Native Americans" then I want to be called an "American Native" since I was born in North America. They only want to discuss how some white people mistreated American Indians so they can condemn the entire white race for the actions of some white people.

---

quote:

---

I don't see any problem with you wanting to be called an American Native...have at it...who would have a problem with that???

---

All the Progs and One Worlders who say, "Everyone in the USA is an immigrant".

I ain't no immigrant!

quote:

---

If, however, you meant that "some white people mistreated American Indians so they can condemn the entire white race for the actions of some white people" when the topic of discussion is the fact that white folks mistreated Indians, which sure as the sun rises in the east did happen, and condemning all white people for some doing so, then you are merely stating that these people are capable of remaining focused on the topic of a discussion. Again, if these people staggered off on a tangent about the Dutch tulip wars in the middle of a discussion about the condemnation of the white race due to the mistreatment of Indians MOST people would find it a bit confusing.....It'd be like having a discussion with a 3 year old or someone with dementia....

---

You sound just like the Dems who keep saying that bringing up Hillary again after the election is over is irrelevant to the discussion about how President Trump is being treated by the same people who let Hillary off the hook for her crimes.

Apparently, you just don't have the intellect that's necessary to understand the relevancy of discussing what the American Indians did to their own people when bringing up the subject of how bad white people are because of the way they treated American Indians.
:rolleyes: