Started By
Message

re: 2019 Recruiting Class (NSD - Today; 5* WR George Pickens flips to UGA from Auburn)

Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:10 am to
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:10 am to
Have you called Kirby and told him that his evaluations are clearly shite and you need to be brought in as a recruiting consultant, due to your vast experience when it comes to identifying top-end athletic talent?
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 11:20 am to
Plumlee is a terrific athlete. Mathis doesn't look capable. Some of Kirby's decisions are puzzling but he has more information than we have.
Posted by devils1854
Franklin
Member since Aug 2014
6351 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 12:35 pm to
Its probably because he doesnt want to waste a spot on a guy thats going to be drafted by MLB in June and wont even step foot in Athens.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30569 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 12:45 pm to
Jodo and Wiz pretending to be experts one post apart? Shitty alter alert
Posted by Rex Feral
Athens
Member since Jan 2014
11410 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 1:31 pm to
LINK
Stockton is for real
Posted by jodeaux
Member since Sep 2014
1541 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 1:37 pm to
All you have to do is look at their stats maybe?

Also the fact that we didn't even offer Mathis til Fields left, yet we'd signed Plumlee for a long time?

The fact that Plumlee is a superior athlete dominating against better competition in the South?
This post was edited on 2/1/19 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42644 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 1:44 pm to
Disagree that all you have to do is look at the stats. That being said, I do think Plumlee is the better prospect.

I have no idea where he’s projected in the MLB draft.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Stockton is for real


Thanks for the vid link. I think he looks pretty good. Particularly if that is his freshman year (which is what it sounds like).

With that said, I see some pretty big flaws right now as well. Plenty of time to work and develop, but if I were rating some of the key variables right now on a -- to ++ scale, relative to his age:

Accuracy: -/+ probably neutral... lot of adjustment from his receivers required, especially noticeable on intermediate throws or longer.

Release: --, weird double hitch thing before he releases on almost anything longer than 10 yards. Maybe intentional, but doesn't seem to be a pump fake so much as just a crutch/flaw in his throwing motion. On the scramble, he does at least look to throw it, but the motion there is super awkward it seems.

Athleticism: +, Not super fast, but seems to have nice burst and stocky enough frame to hold up.

Arm Strength: +, while the motion may be delayed, he can clearly chuck it pretty good.

Decision Making: ++, Seems pretty keenly aware of what he wants to do, patient enough to let things play out as long as he is able to.

Vision: ++, Sees the field well from what we can see in the clip. Always the trick with highlights... no one picks out the plays where the fricked up.


Also... I realize these are highlights, but how good is his OL (and/or the defensive fronts he's playing against), because he rarely looks like he's in much trouble back there.

Glad we're getting in early though. Going to need to figure out wtf to do with 2020/2021 at a minimum though. If Fromm stays, that would be great, but leave us in real bind in 2021 if we end up locking in on Gunner for 2022. If he leaves, hopefully we'll know early enough to make our bid for a top candidate in the 2020 recruiting cycle (which would have decent separation from Gunner).
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I have no idea where he’s projected in the MLB draft.


I've seen projections as high as first round... those seem suspect, but it's not an insignificant risk, that's for sure.
Posted by devils1854
Franklin
Member since Aug 2014
6351 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

I've seen projections as high as first round... those seem suspect, but it's not an insignificant risk, that's for sure.


He's probably around a top 250 guy right now. He'll definitely be drafted in the top 10 rounds unless he just bombs during his senior season, and Id probably guess that he goes top 5 rounds. His athleticism will get him drafted high. He'll get 6 figures.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
9836 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

if that is his freshman year


It is.

quote:

weird double hitch thing before he releases on almost anything longer than 10 yards. Maybe intentional, but doesn't seem to be a pump fake so much as just a crutch/flaw in his throwing motion. On the scramble, he does at least look to throw it, but the motion there is super awkward it seems


His motion was the only real negative I could find in his tape as well. It is funky, but it wouldn't concern me for a couple of reasons:

1. He's a freshman and he has three offseasons full of tutoring and camps to try to smooth it out.

2. When talking about a college QB prospect, feel for the game (can he command an offense and read the field) and physical tools (can he make the throws, does he have decent size) are far more important than mechanics. He will need to fix it if he wants to be a real NFL prospect.
This post was edited on 2/1/19 at 5:03 pm
Posted by HTDawg
Member since Sep 2016
6683 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Also the fact that we didn't even offer Mathis til Fields left, yet we'd signed Plumlee for a long time?


Urban Meyer and Ryan Day offered him, as well as Michigan. They obviously thought very highly of him. It's just funny that you guys completely dismiss Mathis as if he has no ability at all.

quote:

He looks much better than Mathis, and we didn't even offer Mathis til a day before he signed.


For obvious reasons that have little to do with talent or ability.
This post was edited on 2/1/19 at 5:38 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42644 posts
Posted on 2/1/19 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

HTDawg


quote:

Urban Meyer and Ryan Day offered him, as well as Michigan. They obviously thought very highly of him. It's just funny that you guys completely dismiss Mathis as if he has no ability at all.



Let the games begin
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9433 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

For obvious reasons that have little to do with talent or ability. 


Already playing the race card... You are such a piece of shite.
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Urban Meyer and Ryan Day offered him, as well as Michigan. They obviously thought very highly of him. It's just funny that you guys completely dismiss Mathis as if he has no ability at all.
Exceptionally tall QBs are often given too much leeway.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30569 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 7:00 pm to
His height? Yeah I agree
Posted by DawgRff
Snellville Ga
Member since Jul 2012
6309 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

Exceptionally tall QBs are often given too much leeway

Yep, and that 6'6 Lawrence guy is way overrated.
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7010 posts
Posted on 2/2/19 at 7:44 pm to
Often, but not always.

Lawrence is a player that every coach drools over. Trevor's unusual exceptionalism was apparent before his freshman year of HS.

Extremely rare players like Lawrence are why tall QBs are often given unwarranted leeway. Look at both QBs' HS highlights. Mathis is comparable to Lawrence in height only.
Posted by Prettyboy Floyd
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Dec 2013
15666 posts
Posted on 2/3/19 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Extremely rare players like Lawrence are why tall QBs are often given unwarranted leeway. Look at both QBs' HS highlights. Mathis is comparable to Lawrence in height only.


Cardale Jones was ranked an 87 composite 3 star. Ohio State recruited him because of his size and athletism. He turned out to be a pretty good college QB. He also ended up drafted near the 5th round.

Dwayne Haskins was ranked 95 on composite and also turned out to be a pretty good QB that Urban and Company liked. Another noticeable thing - athletic QB with good height.

JT Barrett was ranked 93.5 overall by 247 and was not quite as tall at 6'2 but also recruited by OSU because of his dual threat ability. OSU didn't skip a beat and none of these guys were 5 star all world QBs.



Dwan Mathis is rated 90 ovr composite so higher than Cardale Jones and a little bit lower than Barrett and Haskins. What you see with OSU is they have a specific type of QB they favor. One that has good ability with legs but prefers to throw. If you look at Mathis tape you will see that he is a QB first. He has good movement in the pocket and the ability is there. It's up to our coaches to coach him up and make him a player but he absolutely has the tools needed to succeed which is why OSU wanted him. It sucks to lose Fields but I have no doubts Mathis can play high level D1 football as a QB.

Posted by DawgRff
Snellville Ga
Member since Jul 2012
6309 posts
Posted on 2/3/19 at 12:27 pm to
Dabo also recruited similar QBs and was very successful. Lawrence isn’t just a drop back QB, he can run also. One recruiting service has Mathis as the #3 QB so I take it they see some major upside in him. If Jake stays 2 more years we’re in good shape with Mathis having 2 years to develop.
This post was edited on 2/3/19 at 2:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 263 of 274Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter