Started By
Message
re: Our team has the COVID
Posted on 1/4/22 at 10:23 am to AggieDub14
Posted on 1/4/22 at 10:23 am to AggieDub14
quote:
LSU is gonna play with less people than the school who brags about a student suiting up for a game.
We had 13 players on defense, where are you seeing LSU has less than that?
This post was edited on 1/4/22 at 10:24 am
1
Posted on 1/4/22 at 3:41 pm to Raid05
They have less overall players. Dang you're the second person to misrepresent what I said lol.
Posted on 1/4/22 at 5:14 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
They have less overall players. Dang you're the second person to misrepresent what I said lol.
How long have you hated puppies?
Posted on 1/4/22 at 5:24 pm to AggieDub14
Still haven’t seen where they have less players than A&M had available, I saw one thing on Twitter saying they had 39, it was reported A&M had 38 and only 13 of those were on defense.
Posted on 1/4/22 at 10:08 pm to Raid05
My mistake then. Last I saw we had low 40s (42 I think).
Posted on 1/4/22 at 11:08 pm to AggieDub14
The current Texas Bowl score is exactly why we didn't play and why every rant tard cried when we pulled out. They wanted A&M to lose just like LSU has because they want to detail our momentum.
There was NO WAY we would have won with only 13 players on defense. Anyone who wanted us to go to a 99.9% sure loss is a moron.
There was NO WAY we would have won with only 13 players on defense. Anyone who wanted us to go to a 99.9% sure loss is a moron.
This post was edited on 1/4/22 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 1/5/22 at 12:07 am to Texas Weazel
Yes I'm well aware. But optics are optics.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 2:55 pm to Texas Weazel
I like watching A&M play football games, obviously the wins are more fun than the losses. I would have rather seen us play even if we had very little shot at winning. Its just a meaningless mid-tier bowl game, who cares who won or lost?
Now if our 38 players were all big lineman and DBs and thats it, I can see not playing. But if we had just about every position with a player or two covered, why not? Throw a running back/reciever out there and run the wildcat if we didnt have an available QB. Just have fun with it and give the guys who can play some extra practice and comptetion.
At the end of the day 9-4 or 8-5 isnt going to make or break us, or our momentum on a recruiting class that is mostly already signed thanks to early signing day.
Play the game.
Now if our 38 players were all big lineman and DBs and thats it, I can see not playing. But if we had just about every position with a player or two covered, why not? Throw a running back/reciever out there and run the wildcat if we didnt have an available QB. Just have fun with it and give the guys who can play some extra practice and comptetion.
At the end of the day 9-4 or 8-5 isnt going to make or break us, or our momentum on a recruiting class that is mostly already signed thanks to early signing day.
Play the game.
Posted on 1/5/22 at 3:26 pm to Texas Gentleman
I'm the same way, as a fan I wanted to see us play cause I like football and enjoy watching my team compete. Obviously like you said the wins are better than the losses but I always enjoy watching.
That being said what aggravates me about the whole thing is everyone wants to act like LSU is the darling child for going out and "trying" but if A&M were to have done the same and play short handed, we probably would have lost and no one on the rant would have made excuses for us. It would have just been "8 & 5" bullshite everywhere, so I could careless what outside perspective is on our program
That being said what aggravates me about the whole thing is everyone wants to act like LSU is the darling child for going out and "trying" but if A&M were to have done the same and play short handed, we probably would have lost and no one on the rant would have made excuses for us. It would have just been "8 & 5" bullshite everywhere, so I could careless what outside perspective is on our program
Page 4 of 4
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News