6
Started By
Message
Rules need to be changed that fumble forward
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:44 pm
Must be moved back to the spot of the fumble on all downs if recovered by the offense.
Punishing the defense for a good play like just happened to Mizzou is absurd.
Punishing the defense for a good play like just happened to Mizzou is absurd.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:45 pm to Geauxgurt
I thought that was the rule
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:47 pm to labamafan
quote:
I thought that was the rule
Only on fourth down.
Same thing where a player fumbles into the end zone and another offensive player can score a TD.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:48 pm to Geauxgurt
I’m watching at a bar with no sound. WTF happened? I saw Arch throw an incomplete pass. They went to review tape/refs under the hood.
Next thing I see, it’s 1 & 10. Arch throwin at the end zone.
Make it make sense.
Next thing I see, it’s 1 & 10. Arch throwin at the end zone.
Make it make sense.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:53 pm to p226
They never blew the play dead and called it as a fumble. UT coaches yelled at UT WR to recover it and they gained 12 yards on it.
Review showed it likely was an incomplete pass but close and as exp executed, review went in favor of UT and stayed with call on the field.
It has rarely been this obvious that either the league itself sent in the call to make sure UT wins or the refs/review officials are directly in the take.
Review showed it likely was an incomplete pass but close and as exp executed, review went in favor of UT and stayed with call on the field.
It has rarely been this obvious that either the league itself sent in the call to make sure UT wins or the refs/review officials are directly in the take.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:56 pm to Geauxgurt
Rules what the frick you talking about man? The SEC don’t do those fricking stinking rules. They just make shite up as they go along.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:57 pm to Geauxgurt
Rules are irrelevant if just ignore them.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:57 pm to p226
quote:
Make it make sense.
ESPN wants their horns in the playoff and DGAF how it happens.
This post was edited on 11/7/26 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 11/7/26 at 1:58 pm to Geauxgurt
I thought there was already rules in place that you cannot fumble ball forward especially if not touched by opposing team.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:06 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
They never blew the play dead and called it as a fumble.
Fumble?! Please. With no sound on, I was pissed pff they were even reviewing it. Griping about how they can’t just review every other play. Can’t hardly watch a game anymore.
If it was a fumble … how’d it get 10 yards downfield? Arch wasn’t running. It came out his hand. HAD to BE an incomplete pass.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:07 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:Correct.
Only on fourth down.
Under NCAA Rule 7-2-2-a, Exception 2, on fourth down, before a change of team possession:
• The player who fumbled may recover and advance the ball.
• If an offensive teammate recovers it, the ball immediately becomes dead.
• If that teammate recovers beyond the fumble spot, the ball returns to the fumble spot.
• If that teammate recovers behind the fumble spot, the ball stays at the recovery spot.
The Holy Roller
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:08 pm to Geauxgurt
I hate the fricking SEC. This shite is the WWE. Why do we watch this bullshite?
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:08 pm to p226
I agree but Mizzou defender also had to play smart there and pick up the ball. You never trust the officials to do their job and always assume they have screwed up.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:09 pm to Geauxgurt
Rules need to be changed that incomplete passes aren’t called fumbles.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:14 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Mizzou defender also had to play smart there and …..
They having trouble with that. They can’t cover anybody.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:55 pm to Geauxgurt
The closest Mizzou defender tried to intercept the pass, and his forward motion took him out of bounds. After the replay, his arm was moving forward with the follow-through and should have been ruled as an incomplete pass. Why would they overturn a ruling on the field unless it was obvious? Plus you have the other overturned calls.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 2:55 pm to Geauxgurt
The closest Mizzou defender tried to intercept the pass, and his forward motion took him out of bounds. After the replay, his arm was moving forward with the follow-through and should have been ruled as an incomplete pass. Why would they overturn a ruling on the field unless it was obvious? Plus you have the other overturned calls.
Posted on 11/7/26 at 3:02 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Only on fourth down.
This on its own is bush league
Why should rules change based on the down
This post was edited on 11/7/26 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 11/7/26 at 3:06 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
I agree but Mizzou defender also had to play smart there and pick up the ball. You never trust the officials to do their job and always assume they have screwed up.
If the Mizzou defender had picked it up then it would've been ruled an incomplete pass.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News