Started By
Message
re: Who would be for AI taking over for SEC Officiating?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 2:24 pm to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 12/14/25 at 2:24 pm to Errerrerrwere
Maybe, but there are usually fans who find something to be unhappy and bitch about.
I liked the way the ACC did it this season. As usual, some fans didn’t like that. But it provided a lot of insight to the review process and decision making.
I liked the way the ACC did it this season. As usual, some fans didn’t like that. But it provided a lot of insight to the review process and decision making.
0
Posted on 12/14/25 at 2:55 pm to Errerrerrwere
AI wouldn’t stop “L”3u losers from bitching about artificial officiating.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 3:17 pm to 3down10
quote:Eliminate the 20 reviews every game.
For what purpose is it needed?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:10 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
You don't think it's funny that ten of you came into a thread that never mentioned anything about Alabama?
No. You asked what people thought about your idea on SEC officiating. Alabama plays in the SEC.
It is weird that you are so shocked Alabama fans would have am opinion on it.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:14 pm to captdalton
quote:
Alabama plays in the SEC.
And over sampled in this particular thread, moron.
No other fanbase had 10 "no's"
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:24 pm to Errerrerrwere
Three quarters of SEC fanbases have moved on from football. That is why this place is so quiet.
The fact that you are counting the number of responses by fanbase says much more about you than them.
What we can conclude is this was a thread to complain about officiating and Alabama.
The fact that you are counting the number of responses by fanbase says much more about you than them.
What we can conclude is this was a thread to complain about officiating and Alabama.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:35 pm to Errerrerrwere
I would be concerned that the A in AI would favor Alabama 
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:37 pm to Errerrerrwere
I’d rather have AI posting here than the OP.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:14 pm to Errerrerrwere
I’m sorry you have no idea how AI works.
Would you like me to send you some basic tutorials on the pros and cons?
Would you like me to send you some basic tutorials on the pros and cons?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:49 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
I’d rather have AI posting here than the OP.
12
I own these Gumps' souls!
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:56 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Imagine sensory technology embedded in the football and field delivering real time data in seconds and without a review from an "outside source.
Ok so using this I assume there would be some type of technology that could determine if the ball hit the ground or was a catch. The problem of course is if the receiver has control of the ball and it touches the ground it is stilll a catch. I don’t think AI can be programmed to pick up all of the nuances to make the correct call better than the system currently in place. Maybe it would be good for first down reviews and TD reviews but outside of that how would it be beneficial in replacing referees?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:00 pm to labamafan
quote:
Ok so using this I assume there would be some type of technology that could determine if the ball hit the ground or was a catch. The problem of course is if the receiver has control of the ball and it touches the ground it is stilll a catch
It would be able to pick up this and more. Sensory technology is getting pretty ridiculous.
quote:
I don’t think AI can be programmed to pick up all of the nuances to make the correct call better than the system currently in place
Maybe not in its current form. They aren't rolling it out next year though.
quote:
Maybe it would be good for first down reviews and TD reviews but outside of that how would it be beneficial in replacing referees?
Even in this scope it would need actual humans assisting.
I'm not saying that refs wouldn't be needed on the field either.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:04 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Eliminate the 20 reviews every game.
That would be nice. And it would be nice to have great officiating too.
But 95% of the calls people complain about are the result of them not knowing the rules. And you can flat out show those fans the rules and they will refuse to accept it.
I don't see how AI is going to fix that.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:10 pm to Errerrerrwere
LSU fan creating a thread to bitch about officiating. LSU fans, folks.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:14 pm to 3down10
quote:
For what purpose is it needed?
To stop the bamas from cheating
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:14 pm to 3down10
quote:Use AI to subliminally teach them the rules.
I don't see how AI is going to fix that.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:17 pm to theballguy
quote:
LSU fan creating a thread to bitch about officiating. LSU fans, folks.
Number 13.
Are we going to get to 20 AI- triggered Gumps in one thread? The way in which you can control these chimps is amazing.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:35 pm to 3down10
quote:
But 95% of the calls people complain about are the result of them not knowing the rules. And you can flat out show those fans the rules and they will refuse to accept it.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:58 pm to captdalton
quote:
But 95% of the calls
Let's pull out random percentages to fit my narrative.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News