Started By
Message
re: Which school has added more value to the SEC - Upig or Mizzou?
Posted on 3/11/23 at 10:23 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Posted on 3/11/23 at 10:23 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Dammit now I’m convinced you’re just trolling me. 

Posted on 3/11/23 at 10:26 pm to TheCheshireHog
Did he not say that? Ban bet?
Posted on 3/11/23 at 10:58 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Texas is arguably the most valuable program in the country.
If you’re talking money wise then let them and aggy battle that out.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 11:20 pm to cajunbama
Arkansas Missouri rivalry is happening.
Posted on 3/11/23 at 11:21 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan

Saying something doesn't make it true. Sometimes we love to troll... evidently within this thread, so do you.
However, Cajunbama got what he wanted in the tread. Damn it!
Posted on 3/11/23 at 11:40 pm to cajunbama
Is this even a question? Arkansas easily. They've had many classic games in football, basketball, and baseball since they joined the SEC. Some excellent football teams in the 60's and 70's too. Certainly not top tier in anything now (except Track & Field), but certainly significant.
Missouri can't even decide what their football uniforms and helmets should be. Basically a Nobody in the SEC. Outside the SEC no one even knows (or cares) what conference they are in.
Missouri can't even decide what their football uniforms and helmets should be. Basically a Nobody in the SEC. Outside the SEC no one even knows (or cares) what conference they are in.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 12:53 am to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
This goes without saying. Just get ready.
When I said get ready it wasn’t about Arkansas, it was about what texas would inflict our conference with. Sorry to derail a debate.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 7:19 am to Hawglicious
quote:
Arkansas brings more to the SEC in basketball and baseball without question.
We don’t like logic here professor, but it’s a fine point you make.
Posted on 3/12/23 at 8:17 am to mouse_cop
Missouri - a virtual paradise. Lol Get outta here. You are drunk
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:04 am to cajunbama
At least Arkansas is one of us, Missouri has no business being in the SEC!
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:35 am to Latarian
quote:update
Last time accomplishing
NCAAT win:
Mizz 2010
Ark 11 months ago
Bowl win
Mizz 2014
Ark 3 months ago
NCAA Championship
Mizzou 1965
Arkansas 2 last night
Posted on 3/12/23 at 10:37 am to cajunbama
Arkansas every day and twice on Sunday. IK this is a troll thread but damn…
Posted on 3/13/23 at 12:55 pm to Razorback Reverend
quote:
Cajunbama got what he wanted in the tread. Damn it!
Whatever do you mean?
Posted on 3/13/23 at 4:52 pm to BamaScoop
Arkansas is a southern state that shares attributes and culture with the rest of the SEC original teams.
I don't have anything against Missouri or the state but it isn't a good fit in the SEC. It is a Midwest state that is a better fit in the Big 10.
I don't have anything against Missouri or the state but it isn't a good fit in the SEC. It is a Midwest state that is a better fit in the Big 10.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 6:16 pm to McNet
Would it be fair to say you aren't interested in making a contribution to the Tiger Scholarship Fund?
Posted on 3/14/23 at 10:06 am to cajunbama
This is the correct answer
Posted on 3/14/23 at 10:20 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:Fixed
Now do beating Mizzou in football in the state of Missouri


Posted on 3/14/23 at 10:42 am to McMillan
Wait a minute. The pigs haven’t beaten Mizzou in football in the state of Missouri since 1944?
Posted on 3/14/23 at 10:48 am to McNet
quote:
Is this even a question? Arkansas easily. They've had many classic games in football, basketball, and baseball since they joined the SEC. Some excellent football teams in the 60's and 70's too. Certainly not top tier in anything now (except Track & Field), but certainly significant.
Missouri can't even decide what their football uniforms and helmets should be. Basically a Nobody in the SEC. Outside the SEC no one even knows (or cares) what conference they are in.
So your argument for Arkansas' vastly superior relevance is that they were excellent 50-60 years ago and have a couple good non-revenue sports.

Here's a dose of reality for you: Mizzou and Arkansas are very, very similar football programs, and nobody outside of a few dorks on a message board give a flying frick about that other stuff you mentioned.
Both Mizzou and Arkansas have some good seasons here and there, but are generally a tier or two below the upper echelon of the conference. Similarly sized schools, similar attendance figures, similar football revenue. The only lopsided statistic is the win-loss record. Mizzou owns them Hogs and has been the better football program since Mizzou joined the SEC.
Posted on 3/14/23 at 10:50 am to dchog
quote:
Arkansas is a southern state that shares attributes and culture with the rest of the SEC original teams.
I don't have anything against Missouri or the state but it isn't a good fit in the SEC. It is a Midwest state that is a better fit in the Big 10.
Fayetteville is part of the same geographic and cultural region that occupies nearly 50% of Missouri. I never quite understand this argument. Sure, Kansas City is more western than southern. And the northern bit of the state might as well be Iowa. But I sure as hell can't tell the difference between Missouri and Arkansas when I cross the state lines other than the roads get notably worse as I head south.
Back to top
