Started By
Message
Which is more impressive?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:05 am
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:05 am
Beating an unranked, inept team with a washed up coach at home
or
Beating a ranked team that fought for the entire game on a neutral site?
***Both are more impressive than beating an FCS team or losing to a team from the American.
or
Beating a ranked team that fought for the entire game on a neutral site?
***Both are more impressive than beating an FCS team or losing to a team from the American.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 6:06 am
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:11 am to New Money
Beating a ranked team at a neutral site is more impressive on paper, but if you have eyes, it was clear who the better team was and who was more impressive in week 1.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:15 am to New Money
Louisville at 24
Clemson at 26
I bet Clemson finishes the season down from 26 and Louisville up from 24.
Clemson at 26
I bet Clemson finishes the season down from 26 and Louisville up from 24.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:06 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
I bet Clemson finishes the season down from 26 and Louisville up from 24.
They don’t play similar schedules. You may be right. I think SMU is the only ranked team on Louisvilles schedule left.
Clemson has Miami as its only ranked opponent left.
Crazy how shitty the ACC is.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:13 am to New Money
Who cares?
They play each other in two weeks.
They play each other in two weeks.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:58 am to gotiger
quote:
Beating a ranked team at a neutral site is more impressive on paper, but if you have eyes, it was clear who the better team was and who was more impressive in week 1.
Agreed, Dabo sucks but it was still an impressive blowout.
Better question to me is was LSU more impressive or Miami?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:59 am to Whentheleveebreaks
LSU fans care very very much
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:07 am to DMagic
No need for lsu to stress. They got the game in the bag. As much as I hate it
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:20 am to New Money
LSU looked really impressive, but it was at home, and looked too easy. Barely even broke a sweat, zero adversity.
Clemson looked most inept from what I saw, and just rolled over.
Louisville looked like they had a lot of fight and will contend for the ACC.
Ole Miss looked like they got exploited on defense, but figured out enough to pull it off. Neutral site much tougher environment, so that showed some mettle.
Clemson looked most inept from what I saw, and just rolled over.
Louisville looked like they had a lot of fight and will contend for the ACC.
Ole Miss looked like they got exploited on defense, but figured out enough to pull it off. Neutral site much tougher environment, so that showed some mettle.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:51 am to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
They play each other in two weeks.
Do you not understand message boards?
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:51 am to Victor R Franko
I bet Clemson finishes the season down from 26 and Louisville up from 24
Ckemson is a 6 win team assuming they improve each game.
Ckemson is a 6 win team assuming they improve each game.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:53 am to New Money
For fans (and coach’s ego) - big win against shite team
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:55 am to New Money
quote:
that fought for the entire game
Might depend were they're ranked and why they were able to make it a fight the entire game.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 10:24 am to Milk
quote:
Crazy how shitty the ACC is.
Impressive win by Michigan there. Beating the MAC will surely solidify their spot in the top 25.
PSU’s toughest non-conference game (Marshall) is behind you in week 1 and you close out with Minnesota, Rutgers, and Maryland. Michigan is one of the three “ranked” teams on your schedule.
Also hear your “Lionettes” dance squad has a dude.
Popular
Back to top

6







