Started By
Message
re: When will Stankey announce the 3 permanent opponents for SEC schools?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 1:46 pm to BurgTiger
Posted on 8/22/25 at 1:46 pm to BurgTiger
You will play every conference team 2 times over a 4 year period (12 Teams), plus your three permanent games. My Guess is that Bama gets UTK, Auburn, then someone else like Miss St. Auburn gets Alabama and UGA, the someone else like Vandy. UGA will get Auburn and Florida, plus someone else.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:09 pm to allin2010
They said we will know in December.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:15 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
Probably. They already took Florida, Tenn and LSU from us. Chances are they take UGA from us too
I love the big 6 fans acting like they have been screwed or will be screwed.
With these latest schedule changes after Texas and A&M, SC lost all of its natural rivals. No UGA, No UF, no UT for 2 years. We got stuck with OU, Mizzou, A&M.
Id say you get no sympathy from me. You get to keep atleast some of the game you look forward to each year, while SC will probably get Mizzou, A&M, and UK.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:16 pm to BZ504
I'm pessimistic. The games I care about are Florida, Alabama, Auburn, and then Ole Miss, MSU, A&M, and maybe Arkansas.
I'd be happy with Florida, Alabama, and Ole Miss. A&M makes sense as maybe the 4th or 5th option. MSU is more important for the sake of traditional games than anyone other than Ole Miss.
This dogshit is depressing
I'd be happy with Florida, Alabama, and Ole Miss. A&M makes sense as maybe the 4th or 5th option. MSU is more important for the sake of traditional games than anyone other than Ole Miss.
This dogshit is depressing
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:17 pm to Lonnie Utah
Beamer has strong midget energy tbh
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:21 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Beamer has strong midget energy tbh
What energy does Sark have? This one?

Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:29 pm to BZ504
Us....
quote:I am thinking Georgia, Florida and Tennessee. I would settle for Vanderbilt, Kentucky and Georgia. I am thinking the permanents will be closer than normal because the other games will be travel games. The whole SEC is now just one huge rivalry.
What school will get screwed the most?
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:49 pm to VFL67
quote:
Probably Bama. If they get Auburn, Vols, and LSU is probably the most brutal schedule in the country
this is plausible, but i think they try to keep only 2 of 3 perm teams that are Big 6.
Florida could get UGA/TENN/LSU, but for the same reason i dont see them getting all 3 big 3
i thing both those teams will not get LSU which will suck as an LSU fan because those have been the 2 most anticipated conference game over the past 20-25 years for LSU fans
having no true conference rival is going to give us the leftovers versus other teams get locked in. We have no instate SEC opponent
must haves:
AU/Bama
AU/UGA
Bama/Tenn
UGA/UF
TX/OU
TX/ATM
State/OM
if i had the choice it would be BAMA/UF/AU, as those have been the beter games over the past 25 years
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:51 pm to BZ504
If what was leaked before they decided on that 8 game 2 year deal happens after assuring some matchups the SEC's goal was to try and get the 8 teams considered the upper level to play 2 of their 3 games against upper opponents and to get the lower 8 teams to only play one upper 8 team when possible. There was exceptions though. Not sure if that is still in consideration. I think some teams were complaining it would be harder to make bowl games if the SEC didn't do that.
I think the upper 8 were going to be considered AL, TX, LSU, OU, GA, FL, TN and Auburn.
I think the upper 8 were going to be considered AL, TX, LSU, OU, GA, FL, TN and Auburn.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 8/22/25 at 2:58 pm to Gator Fever
I had no idea Cock fans were such baby back bitch victims 
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:17 pm to tigeraddict
Why do people not count Tn./Vandy yet they list TA&M/Tx., Ala./Aub., & Miss./MSU as in-state opponents?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:41 pm to BZ504
AI
### SEC Programs: Estimated Toughest Permanent Opponents (Based on Last \~10 Years)
I considered two main factors:
1. **Strength of schedule and frequency of tough matchups** (e.g., playing ranked cross-division teams).
2. **Historical records and rivalry intensity**, where available.
**Rankings (toughest to comparatively easiest):**
1. **LSU – Alabama, Ole Miss, Texas A\&M**
– LSU historically faces a high number of ranked opponents across divisions. One source notes that since 2009, LSU has played a ranked East team in about **40%** of those cross-division games—far more than Alabama or Auburn (\~15%) ([FBSchedules.com][1]).
2. **Alabama – Auburn, LSU, Tennessee**
– Alabama and Auburn have had relatively fewer ranked East opponents (\~15%) compared to LSU ([FBSchedules.com][1]). When Alabama does face top competition, it's often highly impactful.
3. **Auburn – Alabama, Georgia, Ole Miss**
– Similar to Alabama in terms of schedule toughness, but slightly below Alabama due to fewer ultra-high-profile cross-division matchups.
4. **Georgia – Florida, Auburn, South Carolina**
– Georgia consistently faces tough matchups (e.g. SEC title games vs. Florida), but their overall schedule toughness each season has varied.
5. **Florida – Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina**
– Frequently plays a strong Georgia side, and some challenging non-conference games, but overall has seen fluctuations.
6. **Texas A\&M – Texas, LSU, Arkansas**
– Not in SEC for 10 full years, but starting in 2012, facing consistently tough foes like LSU and Texas (also top-tier programs).
7. **Ole Miss – LSU, Mississippi State, Auburn**
– Has played strong rivals but generally hasn’t faced as many top-20 opponents consistently over the decade.
8. **Tennessee – Alabama, Florida, Vanderbilt**
– Although they face strong rivals, Tennessee’s performance vs. top competition over the last decade has been mixed, and Vanderbilt is generally a weaker program, which dilutes overall opponent strength.
9. **Mississippi State – Ole Miss, Kentucky, Oklahoma**
– Some tough rivalry games, but overall less exposure to national powerhouses.
10. **South Carolina – Georgia, Florida, Kentucky**
11. **Kentucky – South Carolina, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt**
12. **Arkansas – Texas, Texas A\&M, Missouri**
13. **Missouri – Oklahoma, Arkansas, Vanderbilt**
14. **Vanderbilt – Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky**
These lower-tier programs either have fewer high-profile opponents or more games against teams with limited national relevance over the past decade.
---
### Why This Order?
* **LSU** leads the pack due to consistently playing more ranked opponents yearly, across divisions.
* **Alabama** comes next—heavyweights, but less frequent elite cross-division games.
* **Auburn and Georgia** follow for similar reasons, though slightly behind Alabama.
* **Texas A\&M** enters mid-pack—its SEC tenure is shorter, but rivalries remain strong.
* **Teams toward the bottom** either face fewer national-level opponents or more matchups with mid-tier/low-tier programs.
---
### Example Tweet
Here’s a concise, Twitter-style summary:
> **"#CFB insight:** Over the past decade, **LSU’s permanent SEC rivals** (Alabama, Ole Miss, Texas A\&M) rank as the **toughest matchups**, playing ranked & high-quality teams most often. **Alabama’s foes** (Auburn, LSU, Tennessee) follow. Programs like **Auburn**, **Georgia**, and **Florida** come next; **Tennessee** & **A\&M** mid-pack. **Ole Miss**, **Miss St.**, **SC**, **Kentucky**, **Arkansas**, **Mizzou**, **Vanderbilt** fall lower, based on enemy strength and big-game frequency over 10 years.\*\* #SECStrength #CFBStats"
### SEC Programs: Estimated Toughest Permanent Opponents (Based on Last \~10 Years)
I considered two main factors:
1. **Strength of schedule and frequency of tough matchups** (e.g., playing ranked cross-division teams).
2. **Historical records and rivalry intensity**, where available.
**Rankings (toughest to comparatively easiest):**
1. **LSU – Alabama, Ole Miss, Texas A\&M**
– LSU historically faces a high number of ranked opponents across divisions. One source notes that since 2009, LSU has played a ranked East team in about **40%** of those cross-division games—far more than Alabama or Auburn (\~15%) ([FBSchedules.com][1]).
2. **Alabama – Auburn, LSU, Tennessee**
– Alabama and Auburn have had relatively fewer ranked East opponents (\~15%) compared to LSU ([FBSchedules.com][1]). When Alabama does face top competition, it's often highly impactful.
3. **Auburn – Alabama, Georgia, Ole Miss**
– Similar to Alabama in terms of schedule toughness, but slightly below Alabama due to fewer ultra-high-profile cross-division matchups.
4. **Georgia – Florida, Auburn, South Carolina**
– Georgia consistently faces tough matchups (e.g. SEC title games vs. Florida), but their overall schedule toughness each season has varied.
5. **Florida – Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina**
– Frequently plays a strong Georgia side, and some challenging non-conference games, but overall has seen fluctuations.
6. **Texas A\&M – Texas, LSU, Arkansas**
– Not in SEC for 10 full years, but starting in 2012, facing consistently tough foes like LSU and Texas (also top-tier programs).
7. **Ole Miss – LSU, Mississippi State, Auburn**
– Has played strong rivals but generally hasn’t faced as many top-20 opponents consistently over the decade.
8. **Tennessee – Alabama, Florida, Vanderbilt**
– Although they face strong rivals, Tennessee’s performance vs. top competition over the last decade has been mixed, and Vanderbilt is generally a weaker program, which dilutes overall opponent strength.
9. **Mississippi State – Ole Miss, Kentucky, Oklahoma**
– Some tough rivalry games, but overall less exposure to national powerhouses.
10. **South Carolina – Georgia, Florida, Kentucky**
11. **Kentucky – South Carolina, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt**
12. **Arkansas – Texas, Texas A\&M, Missouri**
13. **Missouri – Oklahoma, Arkansas, Vanderbilt**
14. **Vanderbilt – Tennessee, Missouri, Kentucky**
These lower-tier programs either have fewer high-profile opponents or more games against teams with limited national relevance over the past decade.
---
### Why This Order?
* **LSU** leads the pack due to consistently playing more ranked opponents yearly, across divisions.
* **Alabama** comes next—heavyweights, but less frequent elite cross-division games.
* **Auburn and Georgia** follow for similar reasons, though slightly behind Alabama.
* **Texas A\&M** enters mid-pack—its SEC tenure is shorter, but rivalries remain strong.
* **Teams toward the bottom** either face fewer national-level opponents or more matchups with mid-tier/low-tier programs.
---
### Example Tweet
Here’s a concise, Twitter-style summary:
> **"#CFB insight:** Over the past decade, **LSU’s permanent SEC rivals** (Alabama, Ole Miss, Texas A\&M) rank as the **toughest matchups**, playing ranked & high-quality teams most often. **Alabama’s foes** (Auburn, LSU, Tennessee) follow. Programs like **Auburn**, **Georgia**, and **Florida** come next; **Tennessee** & **A\&M** mid-pack. **Ole Miss**, **Miss St.**, **SC**, **Kentucky**, **Arkansas**, **Mizzou**, **Vanderbilt** fall lower, based on enemy strength and big-game frequency over 10 years.\*\* #SECStrength #CFBStats"
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:52 pm to VFL67
quote:I think they switch LSU with Miss State.
Probably Bama. If they get Auburn, Vols, and LSU is probably the most brutal schedule in the country. Tbh they will deserve some respect if they say bring that on
Posted on 8/23/25 at 11:09 am to BZ504
He will announce it after he clears it with his butt boys from Texas
Posted on 8/23/25 at 11:25 am to BZ504
Has anyone heard when they will release the 3 permanent teams for each school? Does this start next year?
Popular
Back to top


1








