Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:18 pm to AU24
OL and DL is more important than QB
Posted on 2/11/17 at 3:23 pm to AU24
Long snapper
Posted on 2/11/17 at 5:24 pm to AU24
OLT
Posted on 2/11/17 at 5:25 pm to AU24
MLB (Signal caller for the defense)
Posted on 2/11/17 at 6:00 pm to AU24
DT. If you can blow up the middle every play you win.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 6:15 pm to TrueReb13
LT (Protects the QB)
MLB (QB of the Defense)
DE (Can single handily stop an offense)
MLB (QB of the Defense)
DE (Can single handily stop an offense)
Posted on 2/11/17 at 8:52 pm to TheDeathValley
DT. If he's good he's more important than the QB.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 8:59 pm to AU24
HC
Posted on 2/11/17 at 9:01 pm to vengeanceofrain
quote:
Middle linebacker.
I'm with you vengance. Give me a MLB that can 'quarterback' the defense. See what's going on. Get folks in the right position. Make the calls. Get in teammates faces when necessary.
Posted on 2/11/17 at 10:25 pm to AU24
MLB
Posted on 2/11/17 at 10:27 pm to AU24
LT
CENTER
CENTER
Posted on 2/11/17 at 10:35 pm to AU24
My top 5 positions:
QB
OT - especially LT due to being most QB's blindside
DE
RB
MLB
QB
OT - especially LT due to being most QB's blindside
DE
RB
MLB
Posted on 2/12/17 at 8:43 am to DannyB
It has to be linebacker.
1 defensive player can wreck an offense. A left tackle can't wreck a defense (he needs 4 to 5 other blockers all hitting their assignments).
I agree that an offense that can possess and move the ball trumps a defense. But no one position can accomplish that on offense except for a dual threat qb.
Linebacker over DT because you can double-team a DT and take him out of the game. You can scheme and take him out of the game. Linebackers are more apt to make things happen playside and backside than a DT. A DT can affect the offensive play calling more. But the LB can affect the stats and make big plays regardless of playcall.
1 defensive player can wreck an offense. A left tackle can't wreck a defense (he needs 4 to 5 other blockers all hitting their assignments).
I agree that an offense that can possess and move the ball trumps a defense. But no one position can accomplish that on offense except for a dual threat qb.
Linebacker over DT because you can double-team a DT and take him out of the game. You can scheme and take him out of the game. Linebackers are more apt to make things happen playside and backside than a DT. A DT can affect the offensive play calling more. But the LB can affect the stats and make big plays regardless of playcall.
This post was edited on 2/12/17 at 8:45 am
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:37 am to meansonny
I get what you are saying and it does make sense but I would still go with the dominant DL over the LB. An elite lineman eats up double teams and sometimes triple teams making the linebackers job much easier. Plus an elite guy like Jon Allen eats double teams on running downs and also affects the quarterback on passing downs. Reuben Foster is a beast and possible top 10 pick but there is a reason Jonathan Allen will be drafted before he is.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:43 am to AU24
Secondary
Posted on 2/12/17 at 9:43 am to AU24
DE
Posted on 2/12/17 at 10:45 am to threedog79
It is LT.
However, it seems like DTs are the most scarce of the really important positions. At least my schools lower down the totem pole never seem to have enough.
However, it seems like DTs are the most scarce of the really important positions. At least my schools lower down the totem pole never seem to have enough.
Posted on 2/12/17 at 10:48 am to AU24
Use spellcheck. It's position
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News