Started By
Message

re: What is the point of Saban denying Brandon Kennedy's transfer request?

Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22677 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:25 pm to
The reason the schools cave on this is because they'll look shitty and it's a shitty rule to begin with.
Posted by Remulan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2014
782 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

many of your best players

quote:

graduate

quote:

have 1-2 years left


Because that just happens all the time right.....
Posted by IgotstrongClap
Middle of land
Member since May 2018
17 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:30 pm to
Wow, good job man, you triggered the bama bitch army
Posted by tider04
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2007
5606 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

We're talking about grad transfers.

Yes and even with grad-transfers, schools and conferences have always had the ability to restrict where their players go. Namely prohibiting their players from going to schools they'll be playing. Which seems completely reasonable. Would people be okay if the Navy invested years and hundreds of thousands of dollars training a Navy Seal, and then after a couple of years he decided he wanted to go work with Russia's military? I realize that's not a perfect analogy, but surely you can see the point. Train a guy and make him dangerous and then send him off to your biggest enemies. Seems sort of dumb, really.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37619 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 4:40 pm to
Better analogy would be an appointment to West Point. Student gets a paid for education in exchange that student owes Uncle Sam and the US taxpayer 4 years of service in exchange for that education.

Athlete has committed to play for a university in exchange for a scholarship. That athlete has committed their amateur eligibility to that school. If they leave or graduate early then there are rules that govern how that remaining eligibility is treated.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22677 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 5:05 pm to
I don’t need any anologies. I understand the program’s stance. I tend to side with the student-athlete, being a former one. I don’t think any player should be able to transfer and not sit out a year for whatever reason. I just think that one that’s put in the time to graduate with eligibility left should be rewarded for that and should be able to finish their eligibility wherever they choose.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 6:10 pm to
Wow the Bama fans in this thread are MAD

What are the cliff notes re: this
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 8:57 pm to
Why would Saban want to just allow the depth he has developed to follow coaches around the SEC?
Posted by Scoreboard
Madison, AL
Member since Apr 2012
2011 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 10:37 pm to
Jerk
Posted by SAINTS0321
Member since Jan 2016
3963 posts
Posted on 5/22/18 at 10:55 pm to
Non compete clauses are just plain common sense
Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
18726 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Why would Saban want to just allow the depth he has developed to follow coaches around the SEC?


Because coaches can up and leave a school at any time if they get offered more money.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 8:07 am to
quote:

His getting a degree is completely separate from his amateur eligibility.


But it's really not. The NCAA doesn't prohibit in-conference transfers. In fact, a lot of NCAA rules regarding eligibility change once you graduate (like having to sit out). This particular case is a conference rule not an NCAA restriction.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30599 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 8:09 am to
quote:

This particular case is a conference rule not an NCAA restriction.


...which other conferences also have.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 8:11 am to
quote:

...which other conferences also have.



So? They also have waivers like the one granted last season to UGA. If you graduate it's different.
This post was edited on 5/23/18 at 8:12 am
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 8:14 am to
Sankey will have a hard time explaining himself if he doesn't grant the waiver. This is what he said about Maurice Smith:

quote:

"The standard for granting waivers has been clear and compelling evidence that there is reason for allowing an exception to SEC rules," Sankey said in a statement. "I found, among other contributing factors, that a student-athlete who graduates in three years and exhibits a strong commitment to his or her academic future provides compelling motivation to help them achieve their goals on and off the field."
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30599 posts
Posted on 5/23/18 at 8:16 am to
just saying that the rule isn't unique to the SEC.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter