Started By
Message
re: Was the targeting call against RSJ (TAMU) the correct call?
Posted on 10/6/15 at 10:37 am to spytiger
Posted on 10/6/15 at 10:37 am to spytiger
quote:But RSJ did not "target the head/neck area" either. He hit the guy solidly in the shoulder. The helmet contact was clearly collateral to the shoulder contact. Exactly like the hypo.
Nope. The blocker neither hits with the crown of the helmet nor targets the head/neck area. Easy call.
1
Posted on 10/6/15 at 10:41 am to AggieHank86
The rule is so goddamn stupid.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 10:46 am to ryanthe4aces
yes it was targeting. rsj should have put his helmet across the chest of the dude and there was no question.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:35 pm to Cruiserhog
Or drop and take out his hip and risk blowing out the guys knee
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:50 pm to shanklin12
Shanklin:
Non sequitur here, but your screen name is interesting to me because my family bought a few hundred acres from a "Shanklin" family about 80 years ago ... we still call it the Shanklin Place.
What is the origin of your screen name?
Non sequitur here, but your screen name is interesting to me because my family bought a few hundred acres from a "Shanklin" family about 80 years ago ... we still call it the Shanklin Place.
What is the origin of your screen name?
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:52 pm to ryanthe4aces
Right call.
bullshite rule.
/thread
bullshite rule.
/thread
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:04 pm to AgBQ00
quote:yes they did. in my screen shot, the helmets are already ricocheting off each other before the shoulder pads are making contact.
Helmets did not contact first
this picture shows rsj's body language that he is basically launching into the player instead of making a legal block
quote:i have and other fb players, notably palmer who not only played but covers fb for a living, agree with my assessment. multiple flags were thrown. the play was reviewed and confirmed.
It's perfectly obvious you've never played a fricking down of football.
people are conflating their dislike of the rule with the rule itself. it was the correct call by basically every measure. my dislike of the rule has nothing to do with the reality of the rule.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:11 pm to bfniii
quote:
i have and other fb players, notably palmer who not only played but covers fb for a living, agree with my assessment.
Jesse is chatty Cathy fool who constantly talks about things that are not even happening on the field as if they are big moments in the game.
He's like the Reggie Miller/Joe Theismann of CFB in that respect.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:13 pm to bfniii
Good god man. That's the dumbest thing I've read here.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:19 pm to ryanthe4aces
RSJ bringing the aggie gauntlet tenacity to the offensive side of the ball.
#biatchball
#biatchball
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:40 pm to bfniii
Good god man, you are about as sharp as a spatula. Your fuzzy picture proves nothing of what you are trying to say. I see a guy that led with his shoulder and the helmets came together from that. The second pick looks like a player leaning into and bracing himself to make the block.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:49 pm to ryanthe4aces
I see this one the same way I saw the call against Deion Jones earlier this year. In my view, bad call.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:53 pm to ryanthe4aces
Was is the "right" call based on the rule? Yes.
Is the rule subjective and never called the same way twice? Yes.
The "one and done" shite needs to be done away with. You should get a 15 yard personal foul the first time and a 15 yard personal foul and ejected the second time.
Is the rule subjective and never called the same way twice? Yes.
The "one and done" shite needs to be done away with. You should get a 15 yard personal foul the first time and a 15 yard personal foul and ejected the second time.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:56 pm to Dr RC
quote:the old genetic fallacy. good response
Jesse is chatty Cathy fool
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:56 pm to nc14
quote:typical rantard. tell me what part of what i said is untrue.
that's the dumbest thing I've read here.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 2:59 pm to bfniii
Start with all of it and then go from there.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 3:01 pm to AgBQ00
quote:actually it does if you would just look at it, especially in the context of the video.
Your fuzzy picture proves nothing of what you are trying to say
quote:then you're blind because the helmets had already made contact
I see a guy that led with his shoulder
quote:aka, launching. he could have used multiple different techniques and not gotten flagged. why aren't any of you admitting that?
leaning into and bracing himself
my gosh you people are making this 10 times harder than it is. basically every clued up person immediately recognized it as targeting. the people who disagree don't like the rule which is different than the rule itself.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 3:02 pm to nc14
quote:ok, jr high school. all of the professionals and the video evidence are wrong and you are right.
Start with all of it and then go from there
Posted on 10/6/15 at 3:05 pm to bfniii
Thanks. Keep up the playground trash talk.
Posted on 10/6/15 at 3:11 pm to ryanthe4aces
Horrendous call
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News