Started By
Message
re: Video proof of refs gettin' paid by the REC, yo.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:53 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:53 am to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
Suck yourself off.
quote:
If I could, I would!!
That may be the strangest insult and gawddamned weirdest response I have ever read on TD/SECR.
WTF People!
1
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:53 am to bhtigerfan
Arkansas got screwed a few years back against Florida. If I'm not mistaking.
Bama was screwed during a LSU game, a few years back....Landry (maybe?) pushed down a WR and no defensive PI
LSU was screwed with the Peterson INT no call.
It happens, quit bitching people.
Bama was screwed during a LSU game, a few years back....Landry (maybe?) pushed down a WR and no defensive PI
LSU was screwed with the Peterson INT no call.
It happens, quit bitching people.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:53 am to diddydirtyAubie
Lol that looked absolutely horrible
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:54 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
lol...explain to me the "interception" by ole miss, then?
Lester's foot was out of bounds and the ruling on field was Bama's ball, player stepped out...yet it was reviewed and overturned despite there being zero evidence otherwise.
Because it was the correct call. Something shocking for Bama to be called out on their bullshite, I know, but most teams tend to experience this regularly.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:55 am to cyde
quote:
DOING WORK.
Like the fricking illuminate.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:55 am to Bellabama
quote:
With significant neck strain, I can come pretty close.
Pics?
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:56 am to Broken Coyote
quote:
That may be the strangest insult and gawddamned weirdest response I have ever read on TD/SECR.
WTF People!
I keep forgetting I'm on the SECR and not the OT so everybody isn't quite honest with themselves.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:56 am to OMLandshark
The correct call. Show me where there was grass between his foot and the sideline? The announcers and the expert rules guy they brought in agreed that he was out of bounds, yet, because the call went your teams way, you think it was the right call.
hello, pot, meet kettle.
hello, pot, meet kettle.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:56 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
I didn't think either the touchdown or the fumble on the interception should have been overturned because there was no evidence.
did you miss the youtube clip at the beginning of this thread?
quote:
but I highly doubt a ref would try to openly cheat knowing that there's probably a half dozen tv cameras showing what he's doing
did you miss the youtube clip at the beginning of this thread?
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:56 am to Bellabama
quote:
With significant neck strain, I can come pretty close.
Okay, does the technique begin or end with this?
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:59 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
Show me where there was grass between his foot and the sidelin
I saw it just fine. Sorry that the refs for once didn't rule in your favor. Hard to handle I know.
quote:
The announcers and the expert rules guy they brought in agreed that he was out of bounds, yet, because the call went your teams way, you think it was the right call.
Maybe because the announcers and experts were sucking yalls dick so hard that they couldn't give us one ounce of credit. They were about as credible as Petrino.
This post was edited on 9/30/12 at 1:06 am
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:59 am to OMLandshark
quote:
OMLandshark
wow, you're really kind of a whiny bitch.
This post was edited on 9/30/12 at 1:00 am
Posted on 9/30/12 at 12:59 am to POCKET
quote:
did you miss the youtube clip at the beginning of this thread?
yes, i saw it but we don't know what happened just before it. All we're given is a tiny snippet of video.
It only reinforces what I said...the refs know they are being watched like hawks by a bunch of tin-foil hat wearing fans with dvr's...why would they try to intentionally cheat. I'm sure he had a damn good reason for spotting the ball like he did.
No one will pull up the video evidence of where the player went down...
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:01 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
quote:
he had a damn good reason for spotting the ball like he did.
$$$$$$$$
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:01 am to POCKET
quote:This. They were both called correctly on the field. Neither should have been overturned.
I didn't think either the touchdown or the fumble on the interception should have been overturned because there was no evidence.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:02 am to narddogg81
quote:
wow, you're really kind of a whiny bitch.
So is your wife. Says its much bigger than she's used to.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:02 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
Ok, so I just rewatched it on ESPN3. The spot of the ball actually wasn't favorable enough; the Bama player clearly got a first down. I have no idea what the official was doing there though, b/c he clearly marked the ball over a full yard short with his foot and then decided to put move the ball closer to where it should have been after looking at the first down marker.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:04 am to ChoadieMcSmalls
did you not watch the game? because I know what happenned before it but that doesn't really matter. he marked the spot and then spotted the ball close to a yard farther up the field. What further evidence do you think came to his attention during this time?
and no, nothing I said reinforces anything you said
and no, nothing I said reinforces anything you said
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:04 am to Jon Ham
That just boomed the frick out of 8 pages of tin foil non-sense. fricking barners and butthurt rebs.
Posted on 9/30/12 at 1:04 am to Jon Ham
quote:
Jon Ham
Page 8 of 23
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News