Started By
Message
re: University of Alabama: Why are you not asking Miller to confirm whether he read the text?
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:17 pm to ETT2001
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:17 pm to ETT2001
quote:
Is that UA's job?
Is it the UA’s job to take reasonable steps to ensure they aren’t fielding a team with a player that facilitated a murder? Great question. I’ll defer to them on that.
quote:
My point is the reason for your post is to sling mud at UA
They’re asking for it.
0
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:18 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:
Brandon Miller is in all likelihood, a thug. Occam’s razor suggests he is not a choir boy in all this. BUT…the trash fanbase will defend him. Not only that, the trash fanbase will brag.
Wishcasting
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:22 pm to imjustafatkid
He hangs out with murderers
Did he even call the cops after the shooting? What makes you think he’s a choir boy?
Did he even call the cops after the shooting? What makes you think he’s a choir boy?
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Well actually to anyone without bias
Surely you didn't say this with a straight face. This board is nothing but BIAS. What do you think the last sentence in his statement means? That is, if you have read it.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:24 pm to Jon Ham
So he's bringing a firearm to someone in the middle of the night to defend themself from what? A female? He couldn't just leave the bad situation and get away from it without use of a firearm? The female he shot had a firearm and tried to shoot Miles?
This is all bullshite, Miller knew what he was bringing the gun to Miles for, and if he pleads innocence put his arse on a poligraph. Nothing to hide right?
This is all bullshite, Miller knew what he was bringing the gun to Miles for, and if he pleads innocence put his arse on a poligraph. Nothing to hide right?
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:26 pm to Lg
If you don’t have bias, it is very clear after the lawyers statement yesterday that Miller did read the text and did know a gun was in the car
I would like you to try and explain to me why the lawyer would not outfight say he didn’t know a gun was in his car, or say he didn’t read the text if either of those statements were true
I would like you to try and explain to me why the lawyer would not outfight say he didn’t know a gun was in his car, or say he didn’t read the text if either of those statements were true
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:30 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I would like you to try and explain to me why the lawyer would not outfight say he didn’t know a gun was in his car, or say he didn’t read the text if either of those statements were true
He's either a shitty lawyer or Miller read the text and knew about the gun.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 12:31 pm to jchamil
But he isn’t a shitty lawyer. He knew and purposefully said “Brandon never saw or handled the gun” because he knows how biased Alabama recipients would use that.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:24 pm to Jon Ham
It’s been 48 hours since UA says they found out about the text. We are still waiting to hear when Brandon Miller read the text and whether UA has even looked into this question.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:33 pm to Jon Ham
I'll get right on that. Should have a statement from him sometimes in the future.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:38 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
it appears the University of Alabama doesn’t want to ask.
Or maybe they’ve asked but don’t give a damn if username Jon Ham knows the answer.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:43 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I need my joint [gun] a n****r rl jus got a fakin.”
quote:
can someone tell me wtf this means?
Means you get a free ride at the University of Alabama if you speak this way.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:45 pm to MacMan10
quote:
Or maybe they’ve asked but don’t give a damn if username Jon Ham knows the answer.
Likely Possibilities:
They haven’t even asked, or
They asked but got no answer.
If they asked and got a “good” answer, we’d all probably know by now. If the answer to the question is a “not good” one, Miller’s attorney would not allow an answer.
So most likely either they haven’t even asked or they did ask and received a refusal to answer. Either way it doesn’t look good
Posted on 2/23/23 at 1:50 pm to lsupride87
quote:
very clear after the lawyers statement yesterday that Miller did read the text and did know a gun was in the car
Where in the statement is this? The last sentence of the statement leads me to believe, he either didn't know the gun was in the backseat or he didn't read the text. "Moreover, he had no knowledge of any intent to use any weapon." If he had read the text then he would have knowledge that Miles wanted the gun for a reason. So either the lawyer is lying, or Miller didn't know the gun was in the back seat or that Miles needed it.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:08 pm to Lg
quote:Not trying to be rude, but you have horrific reading comprehension
Where in the statement is this? The last sentence of the statement leads me to believe, he either didn't know the gun was in the backseat or he didn't read the text. "Moreover, he had no knowledge of any intent to use any weapon." If he had read the text then he would have knowledge that Miles wanted the gun for a reason. So either the lawyer is lying, or Miller didn't know the gun was in the back seat or that Miles needed it.
Nothing in the lawyers statement at all points to your interpretation
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:09 pm to Lg
quote:
"Moreover, he had no knowledge of any intent to use any weapon."
It’s another statement that may be technically true but is intended to paint the client in the most favorable way without being the most accurate representation of what happened.
It’s easy to say Miller couldn’t read the minds of the others involved. Does that fact negate any and all culpability he could have in this situation?
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:13 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
It’s easy to say Miller couldn’t read the minds of the others involved.
If he read the text, he would know Miles wanted his gun for a reason. That would show he had knowledge that Miles intended to use it. Otherwise why would Miles even text him to bring it. You can't parse the two.
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:15 pm to Lg
quote:This is woefully incorrect
If he read the text, he would know Miles wanted his gun for a reason. That would show he had knowledge that Miles intended to use it. Otherwise why would Miles even text him to bring it. You can't parse the two.
You can read the text Miles sent, and still not think he was going to use the gun, much less use it for murder
His text did not say “I need my gun to kill someone”.
This post was edited on 2/23/23 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:18 pm to Lg
quote:
If he read the text, he would know Miles wanted his gun for a reason.
A defense attorney can easily say “yeah he read the text but he didn’t KNOW others actually intended on using the weapon.”
Posted on 2/23/23 at 2:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You can read the text Miles sent, and still not think he was going to use the gun, much less use it for murder
His text did not say “I need my gun to kill someone”.
So you believe Miller is innocent. Good to hear. Now tell your brethren. Because everybody on this site said if Miller read the text then he knew Miles needed his gun for a reason. And that reason was to shoot someone. So the theory of Miles wanting his gun for protection is viable. Or he intended to use it to shoot someone. Otherwise why the text?
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News