Started By
Message
re: UF and South Carolina, why don’t you want your rivals in SEC, again?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:43 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:43 am to CarolinaGamecock99
With nothing to show for it. You have always sucked and you always will!
0
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:35 pm to dstone12
Also I am a little curious why people in this league only want to add teams that are really good at sports. I can be objective and say that Clemson is pretty damn solid all around.
but if youre say SC or Ole Miss,State, etc...it becomes so much tougher to win. Even the Bama's and UGA's are more likely to catch L's. This isnt a video game where you win anyways.
but if youre say SC or Ole Miss,State, etc...it becomes so much tougher to win. Even the Bama's and UGA's are more likely to catch L's. This isnt a video game where you win anyways.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:30 pm to GoGators1995
quote:
I noticed it doesn't say, "Country Gentleman" like the Clemson shirt...
...small wonder.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:38 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
I am a little curious why people in this league only want to add teams that are really good at sports.
Because we're tired of adding teams like South Carolina, Arkansas, Missouri and Texas A&M.
We like competitive games on Saturdays.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:52 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
We like competitive games on Saturdays.
Vandy, Miss St, and Kentucky have historically been worse than the expansion teams. I'm sure you're cool dropping them.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:54 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
I'm sure you're cool dropping them.
Not only is that not an option, but that's not even what we're discussing.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:06 pm to dstone12
I cannot imagine UGA wanting Ga Tech back in the league.
I cannot imagine UK wanting Louisville in the league.
Why is this all about SC and UF not wanting two of the most corrupt programs in NCAA history in the league?
I cannot imagine UK wanting Louisville in the league.
Why is this all about SC and UF not wanting two of the most corrupt programs in NCAA history in the league?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:14 pm to rich4pres
quote:You do realize we play Clem tech every year right moron?
They skeered
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:14 pm to GetCocky11
quote:
Vandy, Miss St, and Kentucky have historically been worse than the expansion teams. I'm sure you're cool dropping them
Exactly.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:40 pm to scrooster
quote:
Why is this all about SC and UF not wanting two of the most corrupt programs in NCAA history in the league?
LSU fans still mad about this past weekend
Posted on 3/13/24 at 3:41 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
Exactly
What does that have to do with adding more competitive teams?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 4:07 pm to theCAW
There’s zero reason to throw FSU a lifeline. Zero upside for Florida to make a rival stronger by making them part of this conference. And they’ll recruit even more against us if they have the SEC tag.
frick em. Plus, you guys think LSU fans are bad? Never seen the lower Alabama inbreed rednecks that support FSU.
frick em. Plus, you guys think LSU fans are bad? Never seen the lower Alabama inbreed rednecks that support FSU.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 4:21 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Not only is that not an option
If you think charter members are immune from getting the boot, I got news for you
Posted on 3/13/24 at 4:50 pm to dstone12
No it is understandable. So many people on the rant constantly say that UF, SC, UGA, and Kentucky are blocking their in state brethren from joining that it is kind of what everyone thinks. I think if you took a vote UF fans would keep them out, to keep them broke. But they always come up with the money to stay competitive either by skirting the rules to get state money or tapping into money that is really earmarked for something besides athletics.
They tried to do this a couple of years ago.
I have always wanted them in, so they have to play the same teams we have to play and not the ACC schedule.
It is always something with them. They have been corrupt forever and always seem to skate somehow like the fricking Clintons.
They tried to do this a couple of years ago.
I have always wanted them in, so they have to play the same teams we have to play and not the ACC schedule.
It is always something with them. They have been corrupt forever and always seem to skate somehow like the fricking Clintons.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 4:58 pm to scrooster
quote:
I cannot imagine UGA wanting Ga Tech back in the league.
I cannot imagine UK wanting Louisville in the league.
Why is this all about SC and UF not wanting two of the most corrupt programs in NCAA history in the league?
Because they are big football brands. I'm not saying the SEC will or should invite them to join, but if the conference expands again they will be part of the discussion. GT and Louisville not so much.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 5:11 pm to CNB
quote:
If you think charter members are immune from getting the boot, I got news for you
Personally, I don't really give a frick. They're not getting rid of LSU any time soon.
But the question I addressed was "why people in this league only want to add teams that are really good at sports."
LINK
The answer is because we've already picked up enough non-competitive programs, so it's time to get some that are more competitive. This isn't about getting rid of anyone.
Why is this so hard to understand?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 5:19 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
I didn't give a shite about the rest of your post. I'm fine with clemson joining. I only addressed what I cared to address.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 5:50 pm to CarolinaGamecock99
This is best explanation I've seen. Frick them. We already play them anyway, so why give them any benefits that come with being in the SEC?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 6:11 pm to CNB
quote:
I'm fine with clemson joining
Me too. I just wish we had gotten them back in '92 instead of South Carolina.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 6:55 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
That’s fine. We don’t always get what we want.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News