Started By
Message
re: t.u is better than everyone SECw program other than Bama
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:08 pm to Blackgloves
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:08 pm to Blackgloves
You do realize it says that Bama has the best chance to win against aTm?
2
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:09 pm to Stew2581
Yes Einstein
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:11 pm to Blackgloves
quote:
Rinse and repeat
What was your % chance of beating LSU last year?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:12 pm to TwoDatBait
I don't recall but I predicted a loss or a close game.
The writing was on the wall
The writing was on the wall
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:17 pm to Blackgloves
Nice font fig
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:31 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:As compared to what?
Do you Aggies realize how lame "t.u." is?
Aggy?
Moo-U?
Barn?
Gump?
If Tennessee is to be UT, we need something to call the 'sips. "t.u." seems appropriate. As other SEC fanbases become familiar with them, I am confident that they will see that the term is perfectly apropos.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:32 pm to DirtyDawg
quote:Someone does not understand the chart.
A&M as their easiest W. Seems legit
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:35 pm to Stew2581
quote:
You do realize it says that Bama has the best chance to win against aTm?
You are probably right, 'bama does have the best chance of all the teams in the west of beating A&M.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:40 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Y'all already call us "sips" so why do you need another nickname? Oh, that's right: because of the inferiority complex
we need something to call the 'sips. "t.u." seems appropriate.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:41 pm to Blackgloves
Good thing Bama is not playing Kansas.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:43 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:Every team seems to have multiple nicknames. Welcome to the SEC.
Y'all already call us "sips" so why do you need another nickname?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:48 pm to AggieHank86
quote:How many of them include them in their glossary of terms set forth by the school officially?
Every team seems to have multiple nicknames. Welcome to the SEC.
Is that not embarrassing? It's one thing to call others childish nicknames on a message board. I get that. But your school is actually teaching this to new students at every orientation...
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:50 pm to Buster83
You are an idiot, wait no I'm insulting idiots everywhere
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:50 pm to Blackgloves
quote:
Yes Einstein
Well your post would say otherwise jackass
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:51 pm to Blackgloves
Reminder FPI is voodoo.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:52 pm to XWing atAliciousness
quote:TAMU runs Wikipedia? News to me. Thx
How many of them include them in their glossary of terms set forth by the school officially?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:54 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Here you go (this from tamu.edu, which is where utrejects.com re-directs btw
TAMU runs Wikipedia? News to me. Thx
) I was trying to save you some ridicule from posting wikipedia, but I guess you're resolute in everybody knowing how desperate your school is to not be overshadowed by ours
utrejects.com
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:57 pm to Blackgloves
He's currently at 7 posts and its EARLY
Posted on 5/24/22 at 3:58 pm to Blackgloves
Texas will be a really tough game.
Year 2 of Sark, they've got some great WRs, RBs, and TEs.
They definitely have the skill players to match up. I think the biggest difference will be in the trenches, and we'll have to see how the QB does, but it'll no doubt be a tough game.
Year 2 of Sark, they've got some great WRs, RBs, and TEs.
They definitely have the skill players to match up. I think the biggest difference will be in the trenches, and we'll have to see how the QB does, but it'll no doubt be a tough game.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:06 pm to ChromaticTide
Texas has a lot of skill players and should be a completely different team than last year (I think there are something like 38 or 39 new players this year). Huge roster turnover.
But they're still at least season away from really contending for anything meaningful. The trenches will be in good shape eventually, but all of the best talent will be True freshmen that won't be ready for the NFL talent they're facing in week 2.
I can see Texas being competitive and maybe even having a lead for a very short period of time in the 2nd quarter. But I think this will be a 45-27 type game where it's apparent that Texas won't catch them by the end of the 3rd or very early in the 4th
But they're still at least season away from really contending for anything meaningful. The trenches will be in good shape eventually, but all of the best talent will be True freshmen that won't be ready for the NFL talent they're facing in week 2.
I can see Texas being competitive and maybe even having a lead for a very short period of time in the 2nd quarter. But I think this will be a 45-27 type game where it's apparent that Texas won't catch them by the end of the 3rd or very early in the 4th
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News