Started By
Message
re: Top 5 Biggest Impact Football Players last 10 years (Unofficial; Unoriginal)
Posted on 5/28/12 at 8:18 pm to KillianRussell
Posted on 5/28/12 at 8:18 pm to KillianRussell
Nick Fairley
Posted on 5/29/12 at 5:27 am to Damn Good Dawg
1.Cam Newton
2.Tyrann Mathieu
3.Eric Berry
4.Reggie Nelson
5.Nick Fairly
6.Tim Tebow
7.Darren Mcfadden
8.Dewayne Robertson
9.Percy Harvin
10.David Pollack
2.Tyrann Mathieu
3.Eric Berry
4.Reggie Nelson
5.Nick Fairly
6.Tim Tebow
7.Darren Mcfadden
8.Dewayne Robertson
9.Percy Harvin
10.David Pollack
This post was edited on 5/29/12 at 5:35 am
Posted on 5/29/12 at 5:43 am to VerlanderBEAST
I'd say Julio jones for Bama.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 6:38 am to Tammany Tom
quote:
Of course Cam is #1 and there should be absolutely no debate.
I have to agree. What Cam Newton did, single handed, for Auburn is fricking miraculous. They are just another average joe 7-5 (at best) team without him.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 7:47 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Which is better Dstone you count
quote:
Now talk more about leadership you count.
I feel like there is a 17 year old behind that keyboard.
Yes, RICKDADDY, we know you are 5-10.
Yes, we know you are 220 lbs.
Yes, we know you have an Iphone with a tigerrant app (who cares)
Yes, we know you work out 5 x per week.
But no one gives a shite what you say. You know nothing about football. You use hyperbole to stress your points (like saying the SEC was down in 2011 [wtf?], or that Flynn wasn't as good a leader as JR [wtf?].
Dude, you post 10 x per day on average. Like i said before:
Push your fat arse away from the keyboard;
put the astroglide back in your nightstand, instead of beside your computer;
go outside and play for at least 60 minutes with the other 17 year old kids in your mom's neighborhood.
Stop posting three posts every 15 minutes, and take a breather, kid.
This post was edited on 5/29/12 at 7:49 am
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:16 am to dstone12
quote:
Push your fat arse away from the keyboard; put the astroglide back in your nightstand, instead of beside your computer; go outside and play for at least 60 minutes with the other 17 year old kids in your mom's neighborhood.
Bruh I'm superior to you in every way. I'm 32 not 17. Like I said. You know shite about football. Most the sec's perennial powers were down. Our 3rd best team struggles to put ole miss away. An ole miss team that la tech destroyed at ole miss.
No one but dumbasses think Flynn was better qb than JR. I'm sure you know Flynn was a better leader. You clearly were in the huddle and the locker room.
Yes I'm 5'10 220. Im sorry that I'm genetically superior to you. count
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:20 am to Rickdaddy4188
The SEC was down? Can you name for me the last time 3 SEC teams finished in the top 5. Aside from LSU having to play Bama, SCe and Arkansas dominated in their bowl games, as well as Auburn and Miss St. UGA also choked against the Big 10 #2 when they should have easily won that game.
I'm sorry but just because Florida and UT don't finish in the top 15 doesn't mean the SEC is down.
I seriously
when you said the SEC was down after they were #1,2, and 3 for the first time in history.
I'm sorry but just because Florida and UT don't finish in the top 15 doesn't mean the SEC is down.
I seriously
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:24 am to Rickdaddy4188
Bowl Winners: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, South Carolina, Auburn, Mississippi State
Bowl Losers: LSU, Georgia, Vanderbilt
All publications had the SEC as the top conference TOP TO BOTTOM. Just because LSU and Alabama dominated the conference doesn't mean that the conference was down.
I assume you have to defend yourself here, a lot, don't you?
Again, I say: Get some exercise with the other adolescent kids in the street. Boy, you are simply way off.
Bowl Losers: LSU, Georgia, Vanderbilt
All publications had the SEC as the top conference TOP TO BOTTOM. Just because LSU and Alabama dominated the conference doesn't mean that the conference was down.
I assume you have to defend yourself here, a lot, don't you?
quote:
Your little mind can't comprehend that. I call you a count because that's what you are.
Again, I say: Get some exercise with the other adolescent kids in the street. Boy, you are simply way off.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:24 am to SpringBokCock
quote:
Furthermore, Cam would not have been possible without Tebow -- since Tebow established that a fullback/quarterback combination offense works when you have that one dominant player.
lol
I'm sure our millionaire coaches waited for anecdotal evidence that Godzilla Cam would be effective.
Your whole post is retarded, btw. I just picked that part to quote.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:24 am to ShreveportHog94
If you don't think the sec as a whole was down you're dumb. It was still the best conference but it was down. We had 2 good teams. And one decent team. Auburn was shitty, Tenn was shite, an Florida was shite. Those are 3 of the big 6. So ark takes one spot. We are still down two teams that are normally good. Auburn needed a miracle to beat Utah state and gab up the most yards ever by a SEC team in the Clemson game. Florida outright sucked. Tenn sucked. Also a good as you think Arkansas was tey barely beat a shite Texas a&m and ole miss team. Yes the sec was down compared to other years.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:27 am to ShreveportHog94
No way on earth was Arkansas a real top 5 team. You struggled against ole miss, a team la tech destroyed. You struggled against a shite A&M team. As far as polls go no we weren't down. As far as having the amount of good teams we usually have , we were down.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:29 am to dstone12
Na I'm not. We were still the bet conference, but as far as great teams , we were down. If you really thinK arky was a top5 team ( meaning only 1-2 teams could beat them, you're dumb.
Our 3rd best team barely beat ole miss an vandy. Yeah we weren't down.
Our 3rd best team barely beat ole miss an vandy. Yeah we weren't down.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:31 am to Rickdaddy4188
They barely beat a shite TAMU team that choked every single game it lost including the one against OSU. Yes we did have an ugly game against Ole Miss and Vandy but we were a shite road team for most the season. Teams play bad all the time but it doesn't mean they are shite teams. The point is they all still won the games and that's what matters. By the end of the season the SEC was as dominant as it's ever been and the bowl games proved it.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:31 am to Rickdaddy4188
Rick, take a deep breath, son.
This post was edited on 5/29/12 at 8:32 am
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:32 am to ShreveportHog94
You're not being honest with yourself. If you struggle to beat ole miss, you aren't a good team. La tech went into ole miss and dominated them. Come on man. We were down with the amount of good teams we had.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:34 am to Rickdaddy4188
Okay so tell me LSU was a shite national champion in 2007. You're a fricking moron and you proved it with that statement that we weren't a true top 5 team. If that's the case the nobody in college football should even have a rank.
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:34 am to ShreveportHog94
Honestly if it was a one time thing I would chalk it up as an exception. Arky struggled against bad teams more than once. Ole miss vandy, a&m and y'all were our 3rd best team.
Like I said in the polls , the sec will always get respect (like auburn being ranked at the nd o te year) but as far as having good teams , we were down.
Like I said in the polls , the sec will always get respect (like auburn being ranked at the nd o te year) but as far as having good teams , we were down.
This post was edited on 5/29/12 at 8:37 am
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:36 am to dstone12
This post has been marked unreadable!
Posted on 5/29/12 at 8:36 am to ShreveportHog94
We weren't a great team in 07. We could've been but we weren't
Popular
Back to top


0





