Started By
Message
re: The Winning Flop
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:42 am to Opry
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:42 am to Opry
quote:
The acting job by the QB got the flag.
They immediately threw the flag. Try to make your argument like an adult like the posters above showing the rules on a blindside block and using hands. That is how make your point and defend your position. Not immature comments like this:
quote:
The refs are told to protect the QB like a 16 yo virgin girl at prom night
quote:
If Nussmeier had no chance to make the play, then he should have stayed still.
You have to be kidding me...
1
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:46 am to ApisMellifera
quote:
You have to be kidding me...
You cannot have this both ways when it comes to the QB. Either he's a defender, eligible to be blocked, or he's not. If he's a defender and moves towards the ball carrier, then he should be eligible to be blocked. If he's not a defender, then he should either give himself up or kneel down and take himself out of the play.
I get that they're trying to protect QBs, but this is stupid. If the QB isn't a defender, then he should be officially out of the play. Contact after pick is an automatic penalty. I can get behind that.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:49 am to BasedCrimson
Blind side blocks are illegal… period.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:49 am to RoyalAir
quote:
Either he's a defender, eligible to be blocked, or he's not.
He absolutely was eligible to be blocked. 100% he was taking steps to intercept the returner. I'm not arguing that and I haven't seen anyone else argue that either. If they are, they are idiots.
But to say that the QB should have stood there is pretty weak.
quote:
I get that they're trying to protect QBs, but this is stupid. If the QB isn't a defender, then he should be officially out of the play. Contact after pick is an automatic penalty. I can get behind that.
This is exactly what we should be avoiding. There's too many rules and creating all this confusion. Adding more rules isn't going to fix this.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 7:52 am to Furious
quote:
Blind side blocks are illegal… period.
No one is saying otherwise
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:02 am to BasedCrimson
As an outside observer who actually likes both teams, I have to say that was a horrible call. It wasn’t as bad as the phantom offensive PI call, but pretty damn close.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:04 am to BasedCrimson
This is embarrassing to the sport of football.
You guys seem intent on bringing in a Yankee coach and infecting the rest of the SEC
You guys seem intent on bringing in a Yankee coach and infecting the rest of the SEC
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:05 am to BasedCrimson
Cry bitch
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:06 am to BasedCrimson
quote:
Since when is shoving a guy in the chest an illegal block?
Since the blindside block was made illegal. There is not “just use your hands” loophole. If you knock a player down coming from the opposite direction and especially if that player isn’t looking, it’s a blindside block and that’s against the rules.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:08 am to Imber
quote:
Alabama fans still aren't dealing well with their loss.
Coming from a dude who’s fan base burned our coach in effigy and created a “Rival” game against us because of that Coach….
This post was edited on 9/16/24 at 8:09 am
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:17 am to BasedCrimson
Not "Unnecessary Roughness"
If #5 wanted to he could have OBLITERATED Nuss.
If #5 wanted to he could have OBLITERATED Nuss.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:20 am to TigerFan244
quote:
Saying this as objectively as possible.
You followed up that sentence with this one:
quote:
Not only was it a blind side block you can see that #5 went straight for Nuss’s head/helmet area.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:30 am to TigerFan244
Just because you are offended does not mean you are right!
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:37 am to BasedCrimson
LSU fans would be fire bombing the SEC offices if they lost on a call like this
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:41 am to TigerFan244
What was the call on the play? I admittedly didn’t watch. It would seem like if the interception happened, and then it was called a blind side block after the pick, then South Carolina should’ve kept the ball and been penalized 15 yards. Maybe I’m wrong
This post was edited on 9/16/24 at 8:49 am
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:45 am to BasedCrimson
Gumps are still melting.
LOL
LOL
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:52 am to geauxbrown
Bama fans complaining about officiating is pretty funny. Wasn’t Bama the team that went through an entire season without a holding call when their boy was running the SEC refs?
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:54 am to BasedCrimson
It was stupid on the player’s part. Even Beamer admitted that.
It was a useless hit. It was called.
quote:
"The one at the end with Nick ... it wasn't vicious by any stretch of the imagination but ... can't put ourselves in that position."
It was a useless hit. It was called.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:54 am to geauxbrown
It is painfully obvious that SC got hosed on this call. Take your purple and yellow glasses off and it is easy to see. Dude blocked him and he flopped better than Lebron. Hate it for SC as the refs stole the game from them.
Posted on 9/16/24 at 8:55 am to tigertroy
quote:
It was a useless hit. It was called.
Probably was a useless block but nothing illegal about it what so ever. Refs gift wrapped a W for LSU.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News