Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/15/10 at 7:36 am to Woopigsooie20
Again, I'm glad that the Pigs have Mallett and we have McElroy.
LINK
And CPA even gets a plug by Ivan.
LINK
And CPA even gets a plug by Ivan.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 7:58 am to tuptiger
quote:
Not an apples to apples comparison. You're mentally deficient if you do not see that you cannot make a fair comparison between Mallett and Mcelroy.
I'll make a fair comparison. Mallett is really good an Mcelroy is medicore
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:15 am to OUandLSUfan
Mallet is no good againt good teams though. Don't you think that's kind of important?
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:20 am to OUandLSUfan
quote:
I'll make a fair comparison. Mallett is really good an Mcelroy is medicore
WTF is "medicore"?
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:21 am to arrakis
quote:
WTF is "medicore"?
Sounds like a place that sells wheelchairs
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:25 am to arrakis
quote:
WTF is "medicore"?
It's similar to posting on an internet message board because you like hearing the sound of your own voice...
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:27 am to tuptiger
Na, that doesn't sound right...
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:28 am to tuptiger
quote:Unbelievable! Guy goes undefeated and wins a national championship and you think he sucks.
All of this in my opinion equals GAME "MANAGER" AT BEST. To me, all of this, on average, equals Greg Mcelroy will do just enough to not frick up and lose the game single handedly for the team. If your role on the team is to not lose the game for the team, you suck. He is the equivalent of a right fielder in little league.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:32 am to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:
Unbelievable! Guy goes undefeated and wins a national championship and you think he sucks.
You're probably in the camp that thinks Matt Mauck did not suck.
I believe that Mcelroy sucks. If his on the field performance last year was indicative of his ability, I don't care if he won 4 national championships in 4 years. If he improves dramatically this year, I will gladly change my opinion of him.
I don't believe that will happen, though.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:34 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Na, that doesn't sound right..
It's his only comeback.....
Posted on 8/15/10 at 8:38 am to tuptiger
quote:Teams do not go undefeated and win championships with a quarterback that "sucks".
I believe that Mcelroy sucks
Posted on 8/15/10 at 9:29 am to sec13rowBBseat28
"Teams do not go undefeated and win championships with a quarterback that "sucks"."
^^^THIS^^^
Per Tup, Bama prolly would have won the NC if McElroy hadn't held them back.
^^^THIS^^^
Per Tup, Bama prolly would have won the NC if McElroy hadn't held them back.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 9:44 am to arrakis
quote:
WTF is "medicore"?
Not softcore. Not hardcore. It's medicore!
You know like that Japanese porn where they blur out penetration.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 9:47 am to PurpleandGold Motown
I don't know what you're talking about.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 9:53 am to Alahunter
I'm not gonna post any links...
You'll have to find it on your own.
You'll have to find it on your own.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:01 am to tuptiger
McElroy is a good QB. Leave the kid alone. 
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:14 am to Bernie Moore
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:38 am to Funky Tide 8
There is no way of objectively comparing Mallett and McElroy. The operate in different offenses, with different supporting casts, and they played in much different conditions (Mallett's home games were in Fayetteville, in a stadium that I believe is much less imposing than BDS). Furthermore, Mallett played the top four SEC defenses on the road, while McElroy got Florida and LSU at home.
I think they are both good quarterbacks, but I would never trade Mallett for McElroy because I already know what he can do in OUR offense. Maybe McElroy could be just as good in our offense, but I wouldn't take the risk.
Anyone trying to make an objective comparison of the two is engaging in an exercise of futility. You can't do it, even if you compare their stats. Quarterbacks do not operate in a vacuum--they have a unique offense to run and they have a unique offensive line and receivers. No objective comparison is possible.
I think they are both good quarterbacks, but I would never trade Mallett for McElroy because I already know what he can do in OUR offense. Maybe McElroy could be just as good in our offense, but I wouldn't take the risk.
Anyone trying to make an objective comparison of the two is engaging in an exercise of futility. You can't do it, even if you compare their stats. Quarterbacks do not operate in a vacuum--they have a unique offense to run and they have a unique offensive line and receivers. No objective comparison is possible.
Posted on 8/15/10 at 12:36 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
There is no way of objectively comparing Mallett and McElroy. The operate in different offenses, with different supporting casts, and they played in much different conditions (Mallett's home games were in Fayetteville, in a stadium that I believe is much less imposing than BDS). Furthermore, Mallett played the top four SEC defenses on the road, while McElroy got Florida and LSU at home.
I think they are both good quarterbacks, but I would never trade Mallett for McElroy because I already know what he can do in OUR offense. Maybe McElroy could be just as good in our offense, but I wouldn't take the risk.
Anyone trying to make an objective comparison of the two is engaging in an exercise of futility. You can't do it, even if you compare their stats. Quarterbacks do not operate in a vacuum--they have a unique offense to run and they have a unique offensive line and receivers. No objective comparison is possible.
McElroy played Florida in Atlanta in the Dome, but otherwise great post.
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News